1014
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to c/mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 199 points 3 weeks ago

The prospect of still being billionaires, but with less billions, was just too much to handle

[-] Akasazh@lemmy.world 52 points 3 weeks ago

Exactly why they need to be taxed more.

[-] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 26 points 3 weeks ago

Billionaires shouldn't exist to begin with and don't assume tax money are used by governments for good.

[-] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 weeks ago

I mean, you don’t become a billionaire by giving money away.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 109 points 3 weeks ago

Now imagine if there was some way a government could take a percentage of that and put it towards improving society as a whole.

Oh well, guess we're fucked.

[-] Slovene@feddit.nl 13 points 3 weeks ago

BUT THAT WOULD BE COMMUNISM!!1!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 weeks ago

Now imagine if there was some way a government could take a percentage of that and put it towards improving society as a whole.

Yes, some form of "giving pledge" where the amount was standardized and there was no option to back out. Radical thinking here.

[-] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 81 points 3 weeks ago

Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

[-] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 weeks ago

I really like that as a term, never come across it before.

[-] lowleveldata@lemmy.world 65 points 3 weeks ago

tbh I'm surprised that there are 9 who did

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

as a reward we should leave them for last

[-] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 49 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

On an unrelated note, Bill Gates is in the epstein list.

[-] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 22 points 3 weeks ago

And the reason Melinda divorced him.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 47 points 3 weeks ago

Meh. I actually don't think its a good idea. You just draw power away from the best of a segment empowering the biggest assholes. Taxes should be progressive and include all sources of income not just wages and the tax brackets should go all the way up to the highest income level. So there should be a level for over 100 billion and another for over 10 billion and over 1 billion and so on. Five figure income should be zero.

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 3 weeks ago

Taxes should be progressive

Yeah ofc. Why do you think the billionaires came up with this BS plan instead?

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 37 points 3 weeks ago

The fact that there are 256 billionaires is an absolute failure of our society.

[-] qarbone@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago

256 billionaires that we know of!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 34 points 3 weeks ago

They broke their arms patting themselves on their backs and can’t write checks anymore. 😢

[-] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 34 points 3 weeks ago

Wowza scoob. Imagine that. Rich people lying.

Just wow.

[-] jouhija@sopuli.xyz 16 points 3 weeks ago

Sound like rich people ought to be dying

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago
[-] kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago

why did they only use an 8-bit number to count billionaires , surely there are more of em

/dumbface

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] nandeEbisu@lemmy.world 29 points 3 weeks ago

You don't understand, they're making money so much faster than they can reasonably give away.

[-] brax@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 weeks ago

making money

I think you mean stealing money.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

Not true.

They’re also using imaginary methods to make money grow out of other money.

[-] brax@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 weeks ago

Isn't that basically just stolen money from stolen money?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Hobo@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

This is kind of the actual problem though. It's hard to actually have effective charities. Even some of the most ethical, and well run charities, end up with surplus funds (Dolly Parton's charity for example). The government is setup to spend that much money helping people though. But paying taxes is somehow bad and wrong. I don't know if I had a real point other than maybe we should actually tax these rich folks so they can achieve their dream of giving away at least half their wealth.

[-] nandeEbisu@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

There was a post a while ago where a German person posted that they were confused by the US nonprofit systems, they basically said I pay my taxes and the government makes sure it's spent feeding the needy and foreign aid and all that. Why should I go through the trouble of researching all these charities trying to find a good one to donate to.

Not that Germany doesn't have non profits, but they really should be for special interest type cases where you explicitly want to send money to a cause, not general global well being.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] __VA_ARGS__@feddit.org 28 points 3 weeks ago

Who would have thought

[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago

I forget where I heard this story, but apparently Bill and Melinda were at a dinner party during the Obama Presidency. Bill said that he had "way more power than Obama" and Melinda kicked him under the table. TBF I think he was completely right: politicians in the US derive their power from their ability to raise money from rich donors, while rich donors derive their power directly from their money. And they continue to derive power from their money even when they deposit it into a "foundation" which doles it out tax-free to favored recipients.

In Gates' case, a lot of his "charity" involves donating patent-protected drugs to third world countries to forestall their saying "fuck your patents" and producing life-saving drugs for themselves. Preserving intellectual property rights is the primary goal here, with actually helping people secondary. Anyone who thinks these ruthless multi-billionaires suddenly become benign, caring people in their advanced years is a rube.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] answersplease77@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

by followed up you mean: "Ok after I die, I will donate half of my money to my tax-exempt family-owned-and-operated charity, that just happened to only pay salaries and donations to causes that serve the interests of our family-owned-and-operated shell companies"... :D

it's like sequeezing your late's father dry-drenched cumsocket which he used his entire life, then drinking it, and brag about it... to which I say thanks but no fucking thanks.

[-] panicnow@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago

Link to report instead of awful Fortune link: Giving Pledge

[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

giving half their wealth to what? charities that they control for pushing agendas (and possibly money laundering if we are talking about billionaires in third world countries with much less regulations)

[-] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 weeks ago

These people are genuinely sick in the head, this level of pointless greed is not normal. Of course they aren't going through with it.

[-] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Is any of that because what would have been half their worth 15 years ago is now less than half of what it would be?

Like, if someone had 100 billion in 2010, and did give away 50 billion in that time, but also made a further 20 billion in that time, did they give away half their worth or not?

I've not read the article, so maybe that question is answered in there.

[-] salty_chief@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

Every country would need to adopt a universal taxation of wealthy individual for increased taxes to work. What I am saying is if US has a 75% for those earning over certain amount. Then other countries have to do the same. If not then Billionaires will run/relocate to the cheapest taxes. Which would be easy since the country they move to will be happy to get Billionaires tax money.

[-] ILoveUnions@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago

Relocation is a bogus threat. Billionaires will not leave first world countries.

[-] JakenVeina@midwest.social 12 points 3 weeks ago
[-] ILoveUnions@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

That's why more countries should adopt the usa's stance on external taxation. As much as people bitch about it, it's a great anti tax haven policy, even if we don't follow through on everything else necessary to do so

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] phillycodehound@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

Can't say that I'm shocked.

[-] xiwi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 weeks ago

Lmao fuck them my taxesare higher then half

[-] matlag@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 weeks ago

Once you start to have money, you get a money dependency. No matter how rich you get, the "baseline you really need to live the life you want and nothing more" growths together with your wealth.

Take lottery winners and ask them if they could give away half of their gains. Will you be surprised if most of them say no, even though the day before they would have set their "minimum needed to live a happy life for the rest of my days" at a much smaller fraction of it?

Now take a similar population, but who in addition rationalized them deserving that money through their hard work and talent.

[-] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 10 points 3 weeks ago

Pledge

Words are meaningless.

This article has slightly more dirt but still seems a bit vague on hard numbers and names.

[-] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 9 points 3 weeks ago
[-] recked_wralph@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Or their wealth has grown so rapidly that they gave away half of their 2010 wealth?

[-] Ileftreddit@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

Pikachu Face

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 weeks ago

Wow the greediest scumbags on the planet lied about giving up their ill gotten power? I'm shocked! SHOCKED! \s

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lack@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

That’s 247 billionaires we could have put in the buffet. Never trust a billionaire. Eat them at first opportunity.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2025
1014 points (100.0% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

41810 readers
385 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS