587
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Tesla co-founder previously suggested Taiwan should become a ‘special administrative zone’ in China

Elon Musk, the owner of X/Twitter, was called out on his platform by Taiwan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs after calling the island nation an "integral part of China" and insisting that he understands "China well."

Mr Musk made the comments on the "All In" podcast while answering a question about China and the future of his involvement with the nation.

During the interview, Mr Musk said "I think I understand China well," and notes that he's been there several times and has met with high-ranking officials.

He then turns his attention to Taiwan, and compares its relationship to China to Hawaii's relationship to the US, insisting it is "an integral part of China that is arbitrarily not part of China”.

That comparison is flawed in two major ways: first, Hawaii is not a contested region, but is unquestionably a US state with all the same powers and freedoms granted any other US state; second, Taiwan's assertion that it is its own state is not arbitrary, but instead a position it has held for decades.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 143 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

suggested Taiwan should become a ‘special administrative zone’ in China

Yes, because that worked so perfectly for Hong Kong. 🤥

I bet China would embrace such a deal happily even with eager, wait a few years, and then force full integration.

Musk is such an idiot, that I lack words to describe it. He has been convinced (bribed) by China to spew shit in all directions regarding Ukraine and Taiwan, he is 100% an undeclared foreign agent of the worst kind.

[-] dublet@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago

He has a clear financial interest due the Tesla factories in China and the amount of cars sold there.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Yes, and I bet China is leveraging that, and Musk falls for it.

But I doubt it surpasses USA and Europe combined. Which should be his real interests, and probably would be, if we used similar methods the Chinese do.

[-] dublet@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

According to this Tesla's sales breaks down like this in 2022:

  • 50% USA
  • 25% China
  • 25% Other countries combined

That's a significant chunk of its business.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes absolutely, although I see the numbers slightly different:

The graph says USA 41, China 18, other 23 billion USD. That translates to:

  • USA 50%
  • China 22%
  • other 28.

USA is higher than I expected, but still USA and Europe are way more important combined than China from that graph. So maybe Musk shouldn't rely so much on China, if he wants to look out for his own interests.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jarfil@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

then force full integration.

Don't be silly, China is a democratic country... they would hold a vote, like they did with HongKong: 99% for, 1 against. Totally democratic. 🤫

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Hanabie@sh.itjust.works 101 points 1 year ago

This guy really doesn't know when and how to shut up.

[-] GentlemanLoser@ttrpg.network 28 points 1 year ago
[-] MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I think people underestimating Musk is extremely dangerous.

Everyone underestimated Trump too and gave him 24/7 coverage because of how “stupid” he was.

Assume a powerful enemy is intelligent, or you’ll not understand how they got their power and will be perplexed as to how they grow it and how they will abuse it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

I'm just wondering why the U.S. DoJ isn't doing anything about it.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 33 points 1 year ago

Same reason the IRS spends all their time auditing poor people who made mistakes instead of auditing one billionaire for year. The metrics they're graded on aren't based on quality, they're based on quantity. Going after a billionaire is expensive, and sure, it would have lasting positive impact, but they're graded on number of cases closed

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Sure, but poor people aren't having influence over tense geopolitical situations.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 year ago

Exactly my point. We could spend 1 year auditing / investigating 1-2 billionaires and have way more government funding and way less foreign interference, but we don't because the system is working as intended

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RelativeArea0@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well...this musk person is a well paid shill so...uhm yeah

¯_(ツ)_/¯

[-] Fapper_McFapper@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

I’m just sitting here waiting for Elon to go bald so he can finally come out as Lex Luthor.

[-] Zahille7@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago

He already did. Then he paid a bunch of money to get the hair back.

[-] yoz@aussie.zone 13 points 1 year ago

Thats what $200 billion is for

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago

He wishes he was Lex Luthor lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] APassenger@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

Hawaii was occupied and taken. Taiwan was not.

That Mao captured the mainland does not make the island conquered. Or annexed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

What the fuck is this moron going to say next? "Hitler wasn't all wrong"?

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

He’s gotta take the dunderheaded asshole position on everything apparently. He’d probably be YouTubing from his car right now except he has people fly him everywhere.

[-] generalpotato@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Taking bets on that one soon. I wonder if he is getting brainwashed by his own algos.

[-] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 year ago

Tesla co-founder? Since when?

[-] dublet@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

The company was incorporated as Tesla Motors, Inc. on July 1, 2003, by Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning.[13][14] Eberhard and Tarpenning served as CEO and CFO, respectively.[15] Eberhard said he wanted to build "a car manufacturer that is also a technology company", with its core technologies as "the battery, the computer software, and the proprietary motor".[16]

Ian Wright was Tesla's third employee, joining a few months later.[13] In February 2004, the company raised US$7.5 million (equivalent to $12 million in 2022) in series A funding, including $6.5 million (equivalent to $10 million in 2022) from Elon Musk, who had received $100 million from the sale of his interest in PayPal two years earlier. Musk became the chairman of the board of directors and the largest shareholder of Tesla.[17][18][15] J. B. Straubel joined Tesla in May 2004 as chief technical officer.[19]

A lawsuit settlement agreed to by Eberhard and Tesla in September 2009 allows all five – Eberhard, Tarpenning, Wright, Musk, and Straubel – to call themselves co-founders

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla,_Inc.#Founding_(2003%E2%80%932004)

[-] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 year ago

Since 6 years after it was founded.... That's just silly

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 2d4_bears 34 points 1 year ago

Extreme wealth and a love of authoritarianism, name a more iconic duo.

[-] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

Taiwan should simply not sell microchips to Muskian companies. Let him use 80s ex Soviet chips instead.

[-] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As great of a plan as that sounds, companies like TSMC wouldn't dare to risk tanking their profits just to spite a single company run by an absolute dingleberry.

[-] HollandJim@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

TSMC will do nicely with other companies (re: Apple, which gets most of its chips anyway). Threatening a leading manufacturer is silly when there’s plenty of other companies desperate for premiere hardware.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Why does this tool have an opinion about absolutely everything?

[-] Noodle07@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

That's what having too big of an ego do to you

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

I’m surprised he was able to say all of that with Xi’s dick in his mouth

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Chemical@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Really wish I could figure out how to set up a filter for this POS so I don’t have to keep encountering him.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

How do I block articles about him from showing up?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] joneskind@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wait, what?!

Did that gigantic moron tell Taiwan is part of China???

[-] coffee@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

He knows who's buying 70% of his cars. And that's not Taiwan.

[-] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 11 points 1 year ago

why not the opposite?

[-] TechDiver@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Elon should become a special administrative prisoner in some chinese gulag

[-] themagicaldude@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

I'm convinced that this guy gets off of getting his name on articles.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
587 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39046 readers
2218 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS