[-] dublet@lemmy.world 41 points 11 months ago

Washing cleans genitalia, not surgery.

[-] dublet@lemmy.world 50 points 11 months ago

Good news everyone! Lifetimes will automatically be adjusted to ensure these events will remain "once in a lifetime".

Wait, that's not good news at all

[-] dublet@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago

The Captchas are getting out of control

There are four lights captcha

[-] dublet@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago

Władysław? Baby, don't hurt me Don't hurt me, no more

[-] dublet@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago

He has a clear financial interest due the Tesla factories in China and the amount of cars sold there.

[-] dublet@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, it's pseudoephedrine that you want. Somewhat ironic that Sudafed got its brandname from it, but you can't easily get the original version anymore.

Edited: corrected for availibility of the Sudafed - thanks Blue and Cubby.

[-] dublet@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

Ah but the bipedal mech suits could crawl along to floor, given a really low profile. Tank can't do that. Checkmate.

/s

[-] dublet@lemmy.world 102 points 1 year ago

Lone star state: it's not the nickname, it's the rating.

[-] dublet@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

A heartbreaking story is currently unfolding that’s sure to have devastating ramifications for years to come. Just moments ago, without any warning, the worst person you know just made a great point.

https://clickhole.com/heartbreaking-the-worst-person-you-know-just-made-a-gr-1825121606/

82
submitted 1 year ago by dublet@lemmy.world to c/startrek@lemmy.world
[-] dublet@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

The ocean is big. Really big. You just won't believe how vastly hugely mind-bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist, but that's just peanuts to the ocean.

-- Not quite Douglas Adams

[-] dublet@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

Karl Popper entered the chat.

Less well known [than other paradoxes] is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them.—In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be most unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance

view more: next ›

dublet

joined 1 year ago