339
submitted 3 days ago by kebab@endlesstalk.org to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] normalexit@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

He wants to exclude Biden voters from the $600 Trump tariff rebate checks?! The ones Trump got for us?

The same Trump that was best friends with Jeffery Epstein up until his suspicious suicide? You know, that known pedophile that Trump said "liked them young?" Remember when Trump wrote him a weird birthday card? That was odd for a president to do that. Trump did say he liked to grab women by the pussy. That was weird too.

Wait what were we talking about again? Oh yeah the $600 "sorry we dismantled your somewhat functioning government" check I probably won't get. Cool.

[-] WatDabney@fedia.io 173 points 3 days ago

America - the land of "people should be punished for voting the 'wrong' way."

It's amazing that all it took was a few months of Trump in office for Republicans to stop even bothering to pretend to be anything other than overtly and explicitly anti-American - to out themselves as deliberate and even enthusiastic enemies of every single thing that ever made America great..

[-] gidostro@lemmy.cafe 55 points 3 days ago

I’m totally fine with this. Assuming there is going to be another election, and a democrat wins, I think social security should only be for people who support socialism. Those “backbones of our country” trump voters can go get jobs or die.

[-] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 34 points 3 days ago

there is going to be another election

There won't be

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago

There will be another election. There has to be on order for Congress to be seated in Jan 2027. The only question is how ratfucked it will be.

All the talk of emergency redistricting in Texas is actually an encouraging sign. Because it means that they aren't confident in the outcome of the next election, and need to ratfuck it further.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] azimir@lemmy.ml 36 points 3 days ago

Conservatism is, at its root, monarchist. The original writers and thinkers were focused on preserving authoritarian rule, then upon how to build and maintain hierarchies of society where people rule over others.

They've never been interested in democratic ideals unless it suits them to reinstate a dictatorship.

[-] Photuris@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It must be such a radically different mindset to live in. Like, I can’t imagine ever feeling enthusiastic about enforced hierarchies and monarchy.

Social mobility feels the most liberating, and social constraints the most confining. How can anyone feel differently? I genuinely do not understand.

Weren’t we supposed to be in suppprt of free markets? Aren’t those supposed to empower people to make deals with other people on their own terms, create value, compete, and prosper? Enforced hierarchy and oligarchy feels like not at all that.

It must be control-freakery which, again, I cannot relate to at all.

[-] azimir@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

The early conservative thinkers wrote about the French Revolutions and the rise of egalitarian thinking meant that something must take the place of monarchies to decide the social order. They preferred war as the measure of who should be the leaders, but that money and wealth could be a substitute. This led to Capitalist concepts infesting the right wing since monarchies are off the table.

Innuendo Studios has some great videos summarizing the alt right, conservatism, and Christian nationalism if you're interested:

https://youtu.be/E4CI2vk3ugk

Regarding the mindset issue, it might be more baked into people than we'd like. Two great books on the topic are:

The Authoritarians by Altimeter

The Righteous Mind by Haidt

They also have videos summarizing the works in presentations and interviews. It seems that people end up having shadings of authoritarian drives, which means they're happier living under someone's commands and will work to preserve hierarchies despite the harm it causes others. Whether it is socialization or biological I don't know.

To sum up: some people want to be ruled and they're currently tearing the US down to let a king rule over the rubble.

[-] Photuris@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

I hate everything about this. Because it’s probably spot on.

So, what is to be done about authoritarians?

What are those of us who simply want to live free and be left alone (and leave others alone, if they’d only tend to their own business) to do?

Maybe the answer really is guillotines idk. The paradox of protecting liberalism with illiberal means and all that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world 137 points 3 days ago

Hey quick question: how do you know who I voted for?

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 127 points 3 days ago
[-] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago

Doesn't matter, they'll just go by electoral votes or something

[-] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

Remember DOGE? Remember all of the databases they got access to without any actual clearance? It’s probably somewhere there. Especially if Trump’s allusion to the voting machines being provoked in his favor by his pet Muskrat are true.

[-] InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 days ago

To be honest, I'm just looking forward to the massive tax savings and ridiculously lowered tax bill I'm one billion percent sure is going to materialize in 2026 from all the DOGE savings we've attained. Totally holding my breath on that one. Do cremated remains even pay taxes? Who the fuck am I kidding, this is the USA, of course they do.

[-] SoleInvictus 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

How about you and I team up and throw a party, the size of which directly scales with the savings we experience this year? Of course, any tax savings must first be offset by cost of living increases. Can one throw a party of negative size?

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Can one throw a party of negative size?

That's called a revolution.

[-] Gustephan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I think thats just called crying alone in your room

[-] AlexLost@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

I love that there are two parties, one that represents all of America, and one that represents half of America, and the half side keeps getting elected? Do you want ants, America? Because that's how you get ants

[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

I love that you think either one of them represents all of America.

[-] AlexLost@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

You are right, neither of them do. At least one isn't trying to cut the throats of half the country though. Nice rebuttal! One is willing to put aside differences and find middle ground, the other wants to throw anyone who disagrees in a deep dark prison so they never see the light of day. Totally both sides though, ammirite?

[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You are right, neither of them do.

Duh.

Nice rebuttal

It wasn't meant to be a rebuttal, it was meant to be a mildly condescending statement of an obvious truth

Totally both sides though

What if I told you that two things can suck, at the same time, even if they're not exactly identical? If your choices are losing a toe or losing a leg, of course most folks would choose the toe. They'd have to be real douchebags to cheerlead for the people who cut their toe off though.

[-] AlexLost@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Which is exactly why the Democratic party stagnates around indecision. Every issue is "yeah, but..." Where as the Republican party just ignores literal crimes in their midst, because he's "their guy". This isn't inherently an American problem, it's a political one. Who is cheerleading? Both things can be true too, one is less evil but still needs to be fixed, it's a lot better than literally chopping your own foot off with a blunt shovel and blaming the other guy. I've always been taught and discovered myself that one must always challenge authority, and to beware anyone promising you exactly what you want to hear.

[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Who is cheerleading?

You are, when you say they represent all Americans. They represent their donors. They give lip service to all Americans.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Pappabosley@lemmy.world 71 points 3 days ago

So they're taking the money from the American people and then "generously" giving them back a portion of it and they say only to people who might financially need it. Almost like they're taxing people and redistributing income to those in need. If it wasn't for the hefty piece they're taking off the top and the blatant buying of votes, it almost sounds like Socialism!!

[-] mateofeo85@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Republicans have always been the biggest recipients of welfare.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] VerilyFemme 25 points 2 days ago

This headline is a bit alarmist.

“I mean, you know, the rich people don’t need it … what I mean by that is all those Democrat donors of Wall Street, all these hedge fund guys, who all hate the tariffs, by the way.”

So he is basically just implying everyone who is poor voted Trump, and everyone rich voted Biden. It's basically a neutered version of class consciousness with a tribal mindset. Which is exactly the type of class consciousness I would expect Hawley to want his constituents to have. He's still being disingenuous, but he's not (as of right now) suggesting that we keep voter records to punish people for wrongthink.

[-] Gumbyyy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's cute that he thinks that Wall St hedge fund guys are Democrats

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Meanwhile, Trump Admin requested the voter records for San Francisco county. Now I wonder why he would want that? 🤔

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 17 points 2 days ago

oh boy, 600 whole dollars. Woohoo. That'll cover like 3 months of price increases due to the tariffs.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 59 points 3 days ago

I’d like to exclude Trump voters from all future elections. They’re clearly too stupid to handle the responsibility.

[-] atticus88th@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago

Unfortunately they were smart enough to go vote.

[-] LuxSpark@lemmy.cafe 27 points 3 days ago

Smart? Probably not, but motivated by fear, hatred, and ignorance? Most definitely. Of course, if the specter of a second term didn’t motivate you to vote, then that is not too smart either.

[-] StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago

How? Your vote is supposed to be anonymous. Unless he just means registered democrats

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

The foxes are guarding the hen house.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] blarth@thelemmy.club 45 points 3 days ago

Oh no not $600 whatever will I do without reaping the paltry benefits of our environment, due process, democracy, national parks, worldwide alliances, hope for any future other than an oligarchic dystopia, and soon, I’m sure, my ability to ever retire being destroyed by an orange rapist? Gee, that $600 sure would make all that feel way better!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

The rich people don’t need it .

He means millionaires like him?

[-] Hazzard@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 days ago

Wait... they're doing rebate checks? I thought these tariffs were supposed to magically cover the overwhelming budget deficits? And how exactly will they do that when it's being distributed as free money?

Literally trying to bribe their terrible ideas into being popular, while blowing the deficit out even further. 600$ will finally convince Americans their economy is doing well and isn't barrelling towards utter catastrophe at mach speeds. Astounding work.

[-] NotAnotherLemmyUser@lemmy.world 35 points 3 days ago

After reading through the article, this is a misleading title. It sounds like he's trying to say that Biden voters are all wealthy people that wouldn't need this:

Well, you wouldn’t give it to everybody, you’d give it to the working people,” the Missouri Republican told far-right podcaster and former Trump adviser Steve Bannon on Tuesday. “You’d give it to our people.”

“I mean, you know, the rich people don’t need it … what I mean by that is all those Democrat donors of Wall Street, all these hedge fund guys, who all hate the tariffs, by the way."

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 days ago

Well, that certainly seems fair. After all, even though I'm a Leftist and I detest the majority of Dems, I still voted for Kamala against Trump and that makes me a traitor.

[-] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago

That sounds awful socialist to me.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
339 points (100.0% liked)

News

31365 readers
2177 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS