893
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml to c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 240 points 6 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

For Americans who have the height mode of their brain stuck in "Freedom Units":

Anna Smrek is roughly 6' 9"

'Short King' is roughly 5' 3"

...

For data nerds:

Going by total data for the whole globe, all people:

https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/height-percentile-calculator.php

Anna is ... off the charts, one of if not the actual tallest adult women in the world, literally breaks the calculator.

Anna would be at... the 99.9(8/9)% percentile of men by height, which means that if you use 8.2 billion as a world population, there are at most approximately 1.6 million men as tall or taller than her.

EDIT: I forgor to divide by two, women vs men, so uh, 800k.

===

'Short King' is under the 1st percentile of men (0.77), he is shorter than 99.3%+ of adult men.

'Short King' would be at about the 25th percentile of women by height, which means he is actually still as tall or taller than 25% of women, approximately 2 billion.

EDIT: I did the same forgor /2, so, 1 billion, thanks to FundMECFSResearch for catching my error!

===

Average global male height ~= 178 cm / 5' 10"

Average global female height ~= 165 cm / 5' 5"

...

Possibly also relevant:

https://www.gotquestions.org/how-tall-was-Goliath.html

If you use a more reasonable and realistic measurement of cubits and spans, and go with the Septuagint version of the Old Testament/Torah...

Goliath, the mythical warrior felled by David and his sling, whose name is now just a common euphemism for 'giant'...

Yeah he was only about 6' 6", or about 198 cm.

So...Anna could probably roughly rest her nose on the top of Goliath's head, without bending her neck (or at least not much).

...

Another fun addendum, for I guess dating data nerds?:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886913000020

(If someone can find a more recent study that specifically looks into this, I'd appreciate it!)

Broadly speaking, women prefer taller men more strongly than men prefer shorter women, by a factor of roughly 2.625x.

Women prefer, on average, a larger height difference between themselves and their partner (i.e. males being much taller than themselves) than men do. This effect is even more pronounced when examining satisfaction with actual partner height: women are most satisfied when their partner was 21 cm taller, whereas men are most satisfied when they were 8 cm taller than their partner.

In Freedom Units, thats roughly women being most satisfied with a man 8 inches taller than them, men being most satisfied with a woman about 3 inches shorter than them.

This means a 5' 10" average guy will tend to be well satisfied with a 5' 7" woman's height, but she will tend to not be well satisfied with the man's height, herself on average, ideally, looking for a 6' 3" man.

Even if it was a 5' 10" man and an [EDIT: Whoops, too many numbers, too fast, this would actually be a somewhat shorter than] average 5' 3" woman, she'd still tend to ideally prefer a 5' 11" man, on average.

So, to more accurately assess 'Short King's realistic dating pool, we actually need to find women who are 8 inches shorter than him.

And that works out to women 4' 7" or shorter.

Which is the 0.02 percentile... meaning that 'Short King's realistic dating pool is at worst, just as small as the number of men who are as tall or taller than Anna.

Or, perhaps both Anna and Short King need to find partners who simply accept them and are satisfied by them via being uncommonly partner-height indifferent.

Good luck to both of them!

load more comments (23 replies)
[-] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 242 points 6 days ago

After copulation, the female eats the male to gain energy for her offspring.

[-] forrgott@lemmy.sdf.org 49 points 6 days ago

Or, you know, just sits on my face. Like, anytime she wants...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 92 points 6 days ago

GOOD thing she isn't Trans! OTHERWISE she would have an Unfair Advantage! THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!

[-] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 80 points 6 days ago

Holy cow. I thought this comment section would be filled with light hearted jokes. Some of yall need get your chronically online asses outside.

The is the most reddit esque comment section I've seen on lemmy and it's gross

[-] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago

There are plenty of reasonable comments. Most have more upvotes than the sexualizing ones. That said, look closely at what she is wearing in the pic. If she put shorts on, the sides of that thing would still be above the shorts. The image was designed to have sexual appeal. She is showing more skin than most people have. So of course some people are going to go in that direction. Men in general haven't evolved enough not to.

[-] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 5 days ago

With an image designed to have sexual appeal, is it wrong to see the sexual appeal?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 25 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Lemmy is pretty great compared to reddit so long as the topics stay away from anything to do with feminism or women's rights. Otherwise it starts to feel like the reddit cesspit is leaking, and it's depressing. Anyone remember the few days when "the bear" discussion took over the fediverse? Those were dark times. Or any time someone even mentions the word "mansplaining", even if it's satirical.

[-] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 13 points 5 days ago

That's a light-hearted take. Why do some people like to work themselves into a froth with their imaginary scenarios?

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 126 points 6 days ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] xta@lemmy.world 23 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

i welcome death by snu snu

[-] devilish666@lemmy.world 52 points 5 days ago
[-] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 15 points 5 days ago

He is a cutie, eh?

[-] Doodz@lemmy.ml 49 points 5 days ago
[-] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 67 points 6 days ago

But it's paramount that we ban the 5'5" trans girl who has testosterone lower than cis girls from playing volleyball because....reasons.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 113 points 6 days ago

HER DAD'S TALLER. HOLY SHIT.

1000035513

[-] herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml 38 points 6 days ago

genetics, right? at least one of her parents had to be similarly tall.

[-] SoleInvictus 22 points 6 days ago

You might be surprised! My uncle is 170 cm tall, his wife about 165, and two of their sons are about 170. Their third son is nearly 195 cm. Yes, he's their biological child - we've checked!

Both my aunt and uncle had tall fathers and very short mothers. Height is polygenic (multiple genes are responsible), so my cousin won the height allele lottery and inherited a higher proportion of the height increasing traits both parents carried, making him a height outlier.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 98 points 6 days ago
[-] orenj@lemmy.sdf.org 44 points 6 days ago

😳👉👈

[-] j4k3@lemmy.world 73 points 6 days ago

Poor girl. I've never met a super tall girl that liked being tall. In my teens I worked Nordstrom women's shoes. That is one of the only places with a stock of very large sizes.

Super tall women are an involuntary circus act everywhere they go. I don't envy that. All I have met have a certain sadness in their eyes. I'm sure there are exceptions, but I see sad eyes here.

[-] Venicon@lemmy.world 44 points 6 days ago

Can confirm. Wife is 6 feet tall and wishes she was half a foot shorter (in height before any comedians jump in) but we visited Bergen in Norway recently and she was so delighted that she could buy clothes off the rack and pretty shoes.

[-] Pissmidget@lemmy.world 35 points 6 days ago

My aunt is fairly tall (about 1.9 meters) and she told me she was so thankful for men in drag becoming a thing in the zeitgeist, as she could finally find shoes and clothes her size with ease.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Because you met us while we were buying shoes.

Which is depressing, yes. But other than shoes being sad, my depression and thousand yard stare are unrelated to my height.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 14 points 5 days ago

What's funny is they seem to have the same size feet.

[-] Schlemmy@lemmy.ml 35 points 6 days ago

Death by snusnu

[-] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 25 points 5 days ago

That’s cool but I feel like it would be a nightmare being that tall.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 17 points 5 days ago

The back problems will kick in early.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 10 points 5 days ago

Knees go quicker, especially for athletes

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] deadsenator@lemmy.ca 13 points 5 days ago

I have one nephew at 6’10” and another that is 7’1”. They both cope well enough even when challenged with size obstacles. They are young and generally positively motivated which helps.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cley_faye@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

I have only wholesome thought seeing that picture.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] houndeyes@toast.ooo 32 points 6 days ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 15 points 5 days ago
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
893 points (100.0% liked)

Mildly Interesting

22038 readers
147 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS