104
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 39 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

And to put the power value of 800 Watt in relation: An average human is unlikely to go with more than 150 Watt over a sustained period. If you put this into this web computer:

http://kreuzotter.de/deutsch/speed.htm

http://kreuzotter.de/english/espeed.htm

you get a speed of 27 km/h for a road bike. If you put 800 Watt in for such a bike, you get a speed of 49 km/h (which in Germany is the general inside-village speed limit which is anachronistically high, and is slowly being replaced by 30 km/h where you have bicycles, pedestrisns, or schools).

That also means that an e-bike with 800 Watt power is actually a light motorcycle, with all the associated risks.

[-] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 9 points 1 week ago

Then again, if a car with 200'000 Watts of power rolls through the same 30 km/h zone no one cares. So why should we care about bicycles?

[-] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Because we don't fall for whataboutism?

It's no question that car speeds in cities are going down - and need to go down for safety. And that's no reason at all to make e-bikes significantly faster and make things less safe.

And by the way: Further reducing the speed limits for cars, and making more space for normal bikes, including dedicated bike roads, would achieve exactly what most people which argue for higher e-bike speed limits presumably want: You get much faster to your destination. Again, the European bicycle capitals like Copenhagen, Amsterdam and Paris show how it is done.

[-] asbestos@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Wrong. More watts doesn’t mean faster. Bosch eBikes go up to 750W but are locked at 25km/h. The power is used for uphill climbing ability and responsiveness to leg torque input.
His point also stands. My car has 180.000 Watts and can easily go over 250km/h. Why isn’t it banned?

[-] trepX@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

Because you need a driver's licence for that car, but not an E-Bike. And you can't use that car on segregated green lanes in cities amidst other cyclists and pedestrians.

[-] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Incorrect. A licence, registration, and insurance is required for electrically assisted bicycles capable of exceeding 25 km/h.

[-] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

And such an s-pedelec, by law, is no bicicle and thus, generally not allowed on dedicated bike lanes. So what's your point?

(Additionally, by e-bike they probably mean a 25 km/h limited pedelec, which is called E-Bike in German law.)

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Exactly my point. The power of the vehicle is not relevant because the speed limit always applies.

I'd rather have a 1kW bicycle at 30 km/h than a 200kW car at the same speed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

While I don't think high-wattage e-bike motors are necessarily defensible, where you get mileage out of a higher wattage motor on an e-bike is when going uphill. These motors are already legally required to stop outputting at 25 km/h, and going 25 km/h uphill requires quite a lot of energy to do.

[-] doleo@lemmy.one 32 points 1 week ago

At the risk of sounding like a broken record, I am once again asking the question: Why don't cars have built-in speed regulators?

There's constant chatter about the potential risks associated with the rise in e-bikes, but little to no mention of regulating the existing menace. You want to talk about excessive power? Look no further.

[-] brot@feddit.org 8 points 1 week ago

It's even harder with cars: Why are cars even allowed to go 240km/h? Yeah, there is the german autobahn, but there's no reason why a car which is registered in France should be able to go faster than the french max motorway speed limit. There is also no reason to allow cars to be able to go from 0 to 100 in x seconds. There is no use case for that, even if you try to merge into a motorway or overtake somewhere.

[-] Vinstaal0@feddit.nl 4 points 1 week ago

The drive from France to the nearest German motorway without a speed limit isn't that far, though.

You can also do track days and such, but I agree with you they don't need to be that quick

[-] RepleteLocum 3 points 1 week ago

Actually, the speed should be a bit over the speed limit. What if you are driving the speed limit, but suddenly someone almost hits you? You gotta drive a bit faster.

[-] witty_username@feddit.nl 7 points 1 week ago

Totally agree with you. Would like to add that we should also limit the noise that cars and motorcycles make. Many places have noise regulations but they are rarely enforced

[-] drspod@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago
[-] doleo@lemmy.one 7 points 1 week ago

Thank you for sharing, that was an interesting read. I hadn’t heard of this before.

The first two feedback options do not directly intervene but only provide warnings (first optic and if no response from the driver, a delayed acoustic/vibrating warning), which have to be as short as possible in duration to avoid potential annoyance of the driver.

This part was particularly amusing.

[-] AstaKask@lemmy.cafe 6 points 1 week ago

There's a requirement to electronically limit the speed of all new road vehicles sold in the EU since 2024. The only problem is the vast difference in highway speeds within the Schengen area.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e2/European_Speed_Limits.svg/1280px-European_Speed_Limits.svg.png

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Alerian@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Not that I don't agree with you, but to be fair, cars do require a license, they have to be registered and reguraly checked, which is not the case for a bike. In my opinion the failure here is that those should not be allowed for sale as bikes. Those are motocycle in all but name.

[-] Bob@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago

In Norway e-bikes are extremely strictly regulated: They need to have a power output of 250 W or less, motor output has to be linked to your pedaling movements, and the motor has to shut off completely when you reach 25 km/h. Anything more than that and you need to register it as a scooter/motorcycle. At which point you need a drivers licence, insurance, and can no longer ride it on bike paths. I was under the impression that this was an EU requirement. But maybe S-Pedelecs are treated like normal bicycles in the rest of Europe?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 19 points 1 week ago

From the interview:

The whole industry is worried, but it's not about one company. With motors like these, we are moving further and further away from bicycles, and as an industry, we risk e-bikes being regulated by the EU. So far, e-bikes have been treated the same as bicycles in the EU. And we as the ZIV want to protect this status. To achieve this, we need to clarify the gray areas in regulation that define what is and what is not a bicycle. And two values are important here: performance and the ratio between rider power and motor power.

In this respect, DJI achieves values with the Avinox motor with 1000 watts and 800 percent muscle gain that did not exist before.

As I said, it's not just about one specific brand. It's about everyone pushing the performance values upwards. And the EU could look at this and ask: What are you actually doing here with your Newton meter power assistance factor race? Unlike the e-bike, the S-pedelec with a cut-off speed of 45 km/h is considered a moped in the L1 class and is subject to type approval. The type approval defines the assistance factor 4 for the S-pedelec.

And now the e-bike manufacturers are launching e-bikes that do not require type approval with a factor of 8 on the market.

Note that there is some confusing terminology: "eBike" as a common (but wrong) term means a bicycle with assistance electric power which is limited to 25 km/h in speed. The proper term for this is "Pedelec". In difference to this, "S-Pedelec" means a light motorcycle which in Germany can go with up to 45 km/h, needs insurance, license plate, strict technical certification, helmet - and cannot, of course, use bicycle paths and cycle lanes.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

I don't understand how anyone in their clear mind could think that treating electric mopeds like bicycles was a good idea in the first place.

[-] glitchdx@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

as an american, this doesn't directly affect me, but I am concerned that by the time I can afford to buy a good high power ebike, they might not exist anymore. I'd like it to not take all day just to cross town.

I agree with the idea that a better solution is to just apply a speed limit to bike lanes.

[-] nomecks@lemmy.wtf 6 points 1 week ago

It'll exist, but you'll need a motorcycle license to drive it, and it'll be only on the street.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] brot@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago

There's a whole class of electric vehicles being held back by regulation. We can slap electro motors on wheels and bicycles are not the only vehicles you can build with that tech. Many EU countries are e.g. banning throttles on eBikes, but why are we forcing all those delivery drivers to pedal the whole day? Just give them a gas throttle. For many eBikes uses it really doesn't make sense to include the whole bicycle complexity of gears, chains, shifting and so on. Just give them a motor and a throttle.

Killing the eBike with additional rules, insurance, mandatory inspections and so on would be absolutely idiotic and a good business model for insurances, car companies and so on, so I'm really afraid that this could happen

[-] dumnezero@piefed.social 17 points 1 week ago

We actually need to end the "gig worker" business model where they're racing around all day and reckless driving translates to more money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 10 points 1 week ago

There's a whole class of electric vehicles being held back by regulation.

Do you know that there is a reason for the regulations on light motorcycles, mopeds, mofas, Vespas, scooters and however you name them? It's the number of fatal traffic accidents. And yes, there are probably over two dozens of these motorized vehicle classes which originally started with the idea of an "bicycle with a bit of motor" such as mopeds and mofas.

[-] brot@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago

I really can't see this in the traffic accident statistics. Yes, there are a lot of motorcycle accidents, but if you look deeper into them, those are in most cases "real" motorcycles and not those slower variants. And if you take a look at those eScooters, most accidents here are people driving those rental scooters while drunk. That's a problem, but that's also a problem you won't solve by regulating the dude going to the train station in the morning.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] gian@lemmy.grys.it 8 points 1 week ago

There’s a whole class of electric vehicles being held back by regulation. We can slap electro motors on wheels and bicycles are not the only vehicles you can build with that tech. Many EU countries are e.g. banning throttles on eBikes, but why are we forcing all those delivery drivers to pedal the whole day?

Fine by me, just say them to obtain a driver's license and insurance for a scooter, since basicaly it is what they would drive. Or drop the need of the license for the scooters and light bike.

The point is that a ebike with a throttles is basically a scooter (or bike) and then it is a different things, with differnt rules.

[-] brot@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago

But is there really a fundamental difference? If I build a throttle on my bicycle, it still has the same breaks, the same lights, the same driver, the same max speed. The only difference is that I do not have to pedal, everything else is exactly the same. There are countries where it is totally legal to do this and others where you get quite harsh fines. There is no reason for it to be a different thing.

[-] gian@lemmy.grys.it 3 points 1 week ago

But is there really a fundamental difference?

I would point out that an ebike with a throttle are more like this one (sorry, only find in Italian) than a normal bicycle from a road code point of view.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] gian@lemmy.grys.it 5 points 1 week ago

There’s a whole class of electric vehicles being held back by regulation. We can slap electro motors on wheels and bicycles are not the only vehicles you can build with that tech. Many EU countries are e.g. banning throttles on eBikes, but why are we forcing all those delivery drivers to pedal the whole day? Just give them a gas throttle. For many eBikes uses it really doesn’t make sense to include the whole bicycle complexity of gears, chains, shifting and so on. Just give them a motor and a throttle.

Then they could simply buy a small bike, with all the attached rules, like driver's license and so on.

The point is that a ebike and a bike are two separated things that follow different rules.

Killing the eBike with additional rules, insurance, mandatory inspections and so on would be absolutely idiotic and a good business model for insurances, car companies and so on, so I’m really afraid that this could happen

Rules are imposed as consequences.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] dumnezero@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago

Related podcast: Why I'm Ebike-pilled (with American Fietser) - YouTube (The Urbanist Agenda Podcast). They get a bit into the problem of producers trying to sell more "pseudo-motorcycle" vehicles and how the arms race and regulation race work out.

[-] sexy_peach@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago

I have listened to this episode as well, it's good

[-] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago

Is there a text version available? I don't have all day.

[-] dumnezero@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago

Here's a non-YouTube version: https://podscan.fm/podcasts/the-urbanist-agenda/episodes/why-im-ebike-pilled-with-american-fietser it may have a nicer transcript (probably automatic), but I think you need an account to read it all.

There's the official YouTube auto-generated transcript, but I'm not pasting that here.

[-] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago

What's fascinating for me is that Copenhagen is arguably the most bike-friendly city in Europe, and probably in the world - and very few people use e-bikes there! Why is this? Can somebody who lives there explain why?

[-] LasseKB@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 week ago

Copenhagener here. People do use eBikes in Copenhagen, but I guess it depends on what you consider "very few". My guesstimate would be that around one in five bikes is electric. As to why not more bikes are electric, Copenhagen - and Denmark in general - is very flat, so eBikes are more so used for:

  • long distances (say, people who live ~20 km from work but still want to bike there)
  • cargo/passenger bikes
  • letting people bike who otherwise wouldn't physically be able to
[-] VeganCheesecake 5 points 1 week ago

You can get a well-working used bike for very cheap. New e-bikes tend to be pricey, used e bikes are often still pricey or come with caveats.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
104 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

6773 readers
501 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS