78
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] merde@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

where is California in all this?

~~why exclude Paris too?~~

seems too arbitrary… what are the criteria?

[-] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

I assume they intentionally left out some to round out the numbers a bit and hit 50% in a more interesting way without over half of it being the US.

[-] huppakee@feddit.nl 8 points 1 month ago

Paris is included, but not the regions south of it:

Regions of France Map

[-] merde@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Nantes is wheat fields 🤔 all of Normandy and Brittany too

my bad, for paris i had to zoom a little bit more

[-] FundMECFSResearch 4 points 1 month ago

It includes paris. and the rest is like mostly wheats fields so that’s why it didn’t get included

[-] grahamja@reddthat.com 1 points 1 month ago

The other 50%, it is on the west side of the United States.

[-] voxthefox 20 points 1 month ago

This could probably get a lot smaller if they went by city statistics instead of state, 80% of Texas is essentially rural land/desert very little people live in.

[-] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 month ago

Doesn't include the world's fourth-largest economy ... so what's the criteria here?

[-] oktoberpaard@feddit.nl 4 points 1 month ago

I think they factored in GDP per square mile, plus a constraint that it should be a contiguous area per region and probably another constraint that they wanted to highlight an area in North America, Europe and Asia.

[-] spamspeicher@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago
[-] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 month ago
[-] spamspeicher@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago

Ah, OK. I thought you meant on a country scale. I don't think there are any rules, just an interesting looking map.

India should be included too, its 5th on the list. Instead there are these small European countries.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

I highly doubt west Virginia and Alabama are pulling their weights here

[-] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Out of curiosity, I just looked up Alabama's GDP, and it's similar to the country of Portugal.

[-] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It should come to no suprise, alabama's economy is proped up by the fed. The biggest employers is Redstone arsenal and Anniston Army Depot and all the support industries around them.

[-] BorisBoreUs@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

So it correlates to the major urban population centers of the 1st world...? Makes sense.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Most of them, it excludes the American west coast while including the poorest regions in the country (Appalachia and the deep south, neither of which can really be considered developed)

[-] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

Why are only part of the named countries colored?

this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2025
78 points (100.0% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

4966 readers
70 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS