909
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 139 points 3 weeks ago

Huge correlation with AIPAC being their top donors, fyi.

[-] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 31 points 3 weeks ago

Find me a politician on the US national stage who isn't funded by AIPAC.

Massie doesn't count.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 3 weeks ago

Ilhan Omar, Bernie Sanders, Rashida Tlaib, Summer Lee, AOC (though she's compromised with the party leadership on Israel's genocide to an abhorrent degree nonetheless), Ayanna Presley, Cory Bush (successfully primaried over it) and Jamaal Bowman (ditto), and everyone else not listed here.

They're a small minority for sure, but they exist and pretending otherwise just feeds into the manipulative establishment "electability" narrative that they use to poison the public against progressive candidates.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 23 points 3 weeks ago

I find it incredibly ironic and enlightening that the one Jewish congressperson I can name off the top of my head is on this list.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 9 points 3 weeks ago

the last they want is non-aligned democrat to israel.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] blargh513@sh.itjust.works 80 points 3 weeks ago

Why the fuck is schumer still in office?! Hes the very definition of a dickless, useless democrat. Fuck that guy, just get lost useless boomer, let someone who gives a shit take the seat.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 46 points 3 weeks ago

AOC will probably primary him. Schumer is at something like a 2 decade low in approval while AOC polls much higher state-wide.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 3 weeks ago

He's WORSE than useless. Not only is he a Manchin level shill for fossil fuel interests, he's said that his job is to "keep the left Pro Israel", a statement so blatant that he'd call out anyone ascribing that sentiment to him for using the antisemitic "dual loyalty" trope.

There's literally REPUBLICANS in Congress right now that are less awful than he is! Imagine that: the Senate leader of what the Dem leadership pretends to be the Left being worse than some actual fascists 🤬

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 21 points 3 weeks ago

money. same as the rest who vote pro-fascist

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] vxx@lemmy.world 74 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

With the current political climate USA is in, it might weaken him to get endorsements from the establishment.

Their masks are coming off. Voting in line with republicans and being vocal against anything progressive.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 weeks ago

I was thinking the other day after NPR mentioned Elon's recent spat that he could fund other candidates in mid terms. If he endorsed Democrats that might do more harm than good lol.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] deddit@lemmy.world 67 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Okay, just hear me out for a second.... I completely agree they should endorse him, but rather than just saying they are irreverent (though this may actually be the case) I would like to know in clear and concise terms WHY they are waiting/failing to endorse the man whom was chosen by the people. I think knowing why they won't endorse him is very relevant to the discussion. Eith

TLDR; their silence is very telling.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago

I don't know about the rest of them, though I certainly have my suspicions, but with gillibrand it's very clearly just racism. That interview she gave was extremely telling.

[-] 3abas@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago

It's rich people. The reason is rich people.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Godric@lemmy.world 58 points 3 weeks ago

Did those politicians say "vote blue no matter who" or was that people online in an effort to avoid gestures broadly?

Genuine question, they've always been massive disappointments who would benefit from that.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 53 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I specifically said "vote blue no matter who", because while yes, there are Establishment Democrats that exist, Extermination Republicans are quite objectively fucking worse.

Because if Fascist 47 wasn't in office, we could at least try to get shit done, instead of putting out 17+ daily fires.

[-] OCATMBBL@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago

Rebrand: Vote Blue, because what else can you do?

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 11 points 3 weeks ago

Anyone who has ever used that phrase un-ironically is politically tone deaf, or a Republican agent. I get the sentiment, and even agree with it, but it doesn't communicate what people who use it think it does. The kind of people who use that phrase are the ones I blame most for gestures broadly.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Not specifically, no. Though in 2020 and ‘24 they were definitely on about party unity

[-] Leviathan@lemmy.world 49 points 3 weeks ago

If you primary these establishment fucks out you don't have this problem.

[-] korazail@lemmy.myserv.one 8 points 3 weeks ago

This. We've seen what republicans want to do. We need to stop them and vote 'not-republican' when we can before the ability to do so is gone. The problem is we cannot stop there and only vote every 2-4 years for the least-bad option, we need to make better options. "Both sides" is reductive and hides the problem.

Get involved: find and support people who have your views for all offices: city, county, state, federal, maybe even HOA. Most of these are important. If the incumbent is not working for us, we need to fight them and suggest someone better. If the incumbent is unchallenged, then that's a travesty and they need a primary, if the same party, or an opponent.

For the a while now we've seen the 'left' chase the 'center' and people like OP are mad at this. The solution is not 'vote blue no matter who', but that is a bandage to slow the bleeding and will resonate with the less-involved allies we have. The solution is to prove that we are the majority and push our own into leadership roles where they can make things better.

If you're angry right now, run for office or canvas for someone who is. Being mad, depressed or just bitching online isn't fixing anything. You can make things better, and it starts with finding a 'blue' worth voting for.

[-] AlecSadler 20 points 3 weeks ago

Add them to the list.

[-] Xanis@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

This is one of those situations where not certifying the guy and just getting out of the way is an absolutely terrible idea if you enjoy your position. He got young voters out. The same people who are pretty decent at getting out and organizing for protests and with the way things are going these fish may grow teeth. Maybe not sharks, though no one messes with piranhas all the same.

[-] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

Thankfully they self-identify as those who need to be replaced

Saves a little time

[-] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

Ah, but if you said anything against the blue (but not in favor of red), you were the vile, evil... CENTRIST! (I.e. a label just applied to you to single you out for not blindly agreeing with the zeitgeist.) Seriously, the front page of Lemmy for a good while was just toxic political "VOTE BLUE NO MATTER WHO" and if you didn't agree, you were just a problem.

[-] SparroHawc@lemmy.zip 14 points 3 weeks ago

The critical part of 'vote blue no matter who' is the voting part. That's the game plan short-term when it's election season.

That does not preclude criticizing the incumbents. Or even the candidates. But no matter how you feel about them, you vote for them to stave off misery, and encourage everyone around you to do the same.

Not voting for them sends a message, but it's the wrong message - and that message is that the populace prefers the GOP. Stop fascism in its tracks and vote blue. Fight for actual progress by doing what you can to forward actual progressive candidates and policies. Like NYC is doing right now.

It boggles my mind how people seem to be incapable of wrapping their head around that concept, and instead continue to insist that we shouldn't be voting for DNC candidates because


uh - it'll make things better??? Somehow??? At this point, the willful ignorance is starting to smack of sealioning.

[-] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Not voting for them sends a message, but it’s the wrong message - and that message is that the populace prefers the GOP

Hard disagree on that. That's assuming the intentions of the people. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/You_are_either_with_us,_or_against_us

If you're argument is that we need to be doing what's right and pushing for progress, then why is that cast as something ONLY the "blue" can do? I don't know how old you are to see how many times the "blue" has absolutely failed at their job, failed the people, but for no other reason than they're in the right party, they keep getting voted in. But I've seen several "blue" presidents do anywhere from fuckall to the bare minimum in terms of progress/change.

There are other options to vote for that don't just include the GOP as you seem to suggest. The US isn't supposed to be just a 2 party system. It's supposed to be dynamic; these parties are supposed to die off when they no longer represent the people. If you want progress and change, but keep doing the same thing that doesn't seem to be all that progressive.... are you making any progress?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

In the general election, that's what you should do. If establishment Dems don't back their nominee, it doesn't change how you should vote.

People who didn't vote blue in 2024 actively chose a fascist regime. Anyone who doesn't vote blue in all the upcoming elections (with a Fetterman exception, but he should be primaried) is endorsing the MAGA movement.

[-] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Hard disagree. If we continue the narrative that the US is a 2 party system, actively rejecting and backing other parties in fear "the bad guy will win" (a sentiment and view shared with the Dem/Rep parties), then we've entered a endless loop that only as we've seen over the decades, is a race to the bottom. We elected Biden because we didn't want Trump and largely for no other reason. That's not a good reason. And Biden even commented that he was perhaps too old (his words).

And it's a fallacy, shared by the Dem/Rep, to fear-monger the "If you don't vote for MY party, then it's voting for the other party (the bad guys)". This was a false narrative that was spread this election and several before it, to prevent anyone else from opposing the status quo. A vote for 'not my party' is not a 'vote for the other party'. If I can't vote how I want (speaking broadly here for everyone), then my vote doesn't matter. And if my vote doesn't matter, then I'm not being represented. And if you're going to argue that, I'd like to point to the huge number of eligible voters who consistently don't vote. If we cast non-votes as a vote of no confidence, we'd see a big change in things. But doing that means Dem/Rep would lose the seesaw swings in power they have come to enjoy.

So no, you shouldn't just throw your vote blindly behind any side. Especially because the internet thinks you should (and again, that goes for Dem/Rep alike).

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] pyre@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] boaratio@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

New York resident here. Hakeem Jeffries has always sucked. As does Kathy Hochul. Complete garbage.

[-] El_guapazo@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

Vote blue so, Maintain the status quo!

[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 weeks ago

Hopefully they all become irrelevant sooner or later.

[-] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 3 weeks ago

VBNMW was always "we want to give you a shitty candidate, you'll vote for it and you'll like it."

[-] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Not projection, just a flat out lie.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
909 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

9016 readers
1838 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS