207
“While the bodies rotted in secret, (the Hallfords) lived, they laughed and they dined,” he added. “My mom’s cremation money likely helped pay for a cocktail, a day at the spa, a first class flight.”
If only there was some way of disposing of the evidence.
The appropriate sentence here is to stash him in the same building, and boarding it up.
Can't do better than 20-years in a minimum security for a wealthy white dude though. It's not like he did some heinous, irredeemable crime like smoking marijuana while black or something.
I don't think he's like a decent person or anything, but 20 years of captivity is a hell of a long time...
For desecrating 200 corpses?
This is just for fraud. The corpse abuse sentencing is in August.
What's the difference between 5, 10, 20 years in a case like this? How does it affect the person who did it, or help the families that were harmed?
Americans like their punishment based justice system generally, it’s why you always see people scoffing at literally decades long sentences as “not long enough” so it helps American families who believe in punishment based justice because the person is being punished. It’s cultural
Some judgements are purely punitive, not intended to help anyone. From a social perspective this kind of passed judgement could hopefully prevent others from doing similar things?
Nobody does crimes thinking they are going to get caught. Or they're passion crimes or people don't factor the penalty because they're not suppose to be caught
It doesn't sound like they were considering any kind of risk-reward tradeoff when they were doing this, so I don't think the threat of prison would have deterred them.
Yeah, 20 years seems needlessly long
It's pretty lenient for a cruelty system masquerading as "justice".
Genuinely wouldn't have been surprised if they would've sentenced him to 20 years for each of the 190 instances.
This mainly addresses the 'fraud' side of things, not the desecration of corpses. Notice how the article states, "(for cheating customers) and defrauding the federal government out of nearly $900,000 in COVID-19 aid". That's what they really care about, he tried fucking the government. So as I read it, the Feds wanted 15 years & they probably tacked on an additional fiver for the corpse fraud. He was going to get 15 years because the government wanted him to get 15 years.
Sounds like a lot more effort than to simply cremate the bodies.
Reading only the headline: Why, isn't that his job?
sent grieving families fake ashes
Yes I also read the rest of the text, i just wanted to make a joke.
Just over 1 month prison for each family defrauded, including the body of their loved one discarded like trash.
If he did this to just one family, would he have only gotten a month?
The court has disrespected these families worse than he did.
It's the maximum possible sentence. The court can't do more. Also, this is just the sentence for COVID aid fraud. Sentencing for the corpse abuse charges is scheduled for August.
It's the maximum possible sentence. The court can't do more.
So, if they tried this as 190 individual cases, he'd only get a 5 weeks each? The courts really needed to do more.
Also, this is just the sentence for COVID aid fraud. Sentencing for the corpse abuse charges is scheduled for August.
I reread the article multiple times, and 20 years is the maximum for everything, including defrauding the government, to be confirmed in August.
I agree what happened is a travesty but here's the thing that gets me most ... it's an unregulated business, so the onus is on the state to get their act together and make the rules.
According to this legal site, mishandling of a corpse gets you a lot more than 5 weeks, with mention of funeral homes and hospitals:
The penalties for these crimes vary significantly by jurisdiction. Some states classify abuse of a corpse as a misdemeanor, which may result in fines and a jail sentence of up to one year. More serious acts can be charged as a felony, carrying stiffer penalties, including several years in prison and fines that can reach $10,000 or more.
Organ Harvesting for the black market, maybe.
you can't harvest organs from dead people, just brain dead people still under artificial life support
That’s only true if they’re going to be put in living people. There is a huge black market for person parts.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvard_morgue_case
Lodge worked as the morgue manager under the Anatomical Gift Program at Harvard Medical School from 1995 until his firing on May 6, 2023.[3] The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Middle District of Pennsylvania accused of him of conspiracy and interstate transport of stolen goods. From roughly 2018 to 2022, Lodge allegedly delivered human remains by post to customers, who sometimes visited the morgue to choose their preferred body parts.[4] While selling services associated with the cost of procuring cadavers is not illegal in the United States, selling bodies or body parts is.
You reminded me of a creepy thkng that happened in my country, Colombia, around 30 years ago:
A university's medical departament was found to be attracting homeless people by promising them trash (it's common here for homeless people to get money by recycling trash), and then murdering them inside the university. Medical students would then, unkowingly, do their practices with said bodies. Some organs were also allegedly trafficked.
There is no exact data of how many people died like this, but an estimation is around 50. Aditionally, basically all of the people behind this faced no repercusion.
Here's an English notice about this: www.infobae.com/en/2022/03/27/this-was-the-massacre-of-a-group-of-street-dwellers-inside-a-university-in-barranquilla
I didn't.... want to know that
they are still useful for research, medical colleges, military so they can blow it up.
this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2025
207 points (100.0% liked)
News
31365 readers
2253 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS