990
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 hour ago

I bought an oled phone for 200€ a few years back. What I'd really want is that every smartphone sold in the EU is open, with open drivers and OS with root access if you want to. And some investments by the EU to support open smartphone OS.

What a shithole civilization.

[-] potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish 5 points 1 hour ago

a few things i like:

  • moments is an interesting concept
  • it says you can toggle off gemini ai. this is good
  • display goes from 10-120hz for battery
  • ultrawide selfie camera
  • microsd card slot!
  • power button fingerprint scanner, way better than underscreen
[-] bvoigtlaender@feddit.org 12 points 4 hours ago

Was really hoping to see a Fairphone 6a. Similar to the Google Pixel Series. Just a cheap version of it. I really don't need 120Hz, OLED or "No Bezels" all i want is big battery and a headphone jack that is all.

[-] potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish 1 points 1 hour ago

tbh 600$ is a series pricing.

[-] Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club 14 points 8 hours ago

For real, though, what is it?

[-] Redex68@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago

A time of flight sensor for autofocus

[-] carrylex@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Compared to the Fairphone 5 it has some improvements but also a few downsides:

Pro:

  • It's a bit smaller (~4mm) and lighter (~20g)
  • Slightly better camera (future tests will tell how much better)
  • 120 Hz display
  • More RAM and storage (although I feel that the previous 6GB/128GB option was also sufficient for most users)
  • WiFi 6E Tri-Band (however you will likely never need this speed)
  • Bluetooth 5.4
  • Slightly larger battery

Con:

  • Backpanel now requires a screwdriver
  • Display has less resolution/PPI
  • Performance of processor will likely be nearly identical to predecessor (however it's more efficient and modern)
  • Downgrade to USB 2
  • 600€

My conclusion: Overall the improvements are ok, however just releasing the Fairphone 5 with a newer SoC might have been the better/more cost effective choice. Sacrificing display resolution for 120 Hz feels also quite wrong. 600€ is very pricy for a phone like this. Cutting some premium features away like the 120 Hz display or a bit of RAM and storage (that you can extend anyway with an SD card) might have saved enough to get the launch price down to somewhere near 500€ which would make it accessible for a wider audience.

[-] localhost443@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 hours ago

If the 10hz reading implementation is good I may consider upgrading my fp4. A better camera would be nice too but if they get the power saving if that screen right then I'm interested...

Otherwise my fp4 has everything thing I need a phone to be

[-] Redex68@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Regarding resolution, I've been using my S21 Ultra at FHD quality (2400x1080) since I got it and it has a significantly large screen. I don't see a point in higher resolutions but I definitely appreciate higher refresh rates. Makes it feel smoother and more responsive.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] drmoose@lemmy.world 18 points 11 hours ago

Worth noting buying a second hand phone is still better in every aspect and sadly 2nd hand Samsung from 3 years ago is still better and cheaper. Though Fairphone is getting closer with each release!

[-] gamer@lemm.ee 3 points 1 hour ago

2nd hand Samsung from 3 years ago is still better and cheaper.

Cheaper? Yes. Better? Hell no, unless you can root it and install a custom ROM.

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago

Honestly, this might be the first fairphone which I would classify as good enough for daily use.

[-] swagmoney@lemmy.ca 26 points 12 hours ago

headphone jackn't :(

[-] MystValkyrie 6 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Fairphone has been a really disappointing experiment in so-called sustainable tech over the years. They keep making new phones instead of continuing to support the old ones, which might be greenwashing. (Whereas if you got a legacy Framework 13, it's still user-repairable and upgradable.) If they wanted to make a non-upgradable device, maybe it would have been wise to make it high-end to futureproof to work until 4G gets phased out. Fairphone still is not making their products available in the U.S., and Murena is a borderline scam company and I am genuinely shocked Fairphone works with them.

And I've heard their logic with the headphone jack, but I do think AUX is the lesser of two evils as removing it will just lead to more e-waste with broken bluetooth headphones that rarely last as long as good wired ones. Fairphone's own bluetooth accessories have gotten negative reviews for their lower build quality, so Fairbuds are likely not the solution to the headphone jack problem.

For the simple fact that non-Europeans can buy them directly off the website, I would sooner recommend feature phones from Sunbeam as it also has user-replaceable batteries and you can send it in for repairs. Or just any phone used.

I've had to swap a lot more cabled headphones out due to cable damage than bluetooth headphones, but i also only use overear headphones, which have enough battery storage for days. Also, there are also overear headsets that are dual-useable with headphone jack or bluetooth (no noise cancelling with jack tho). Also, the issue with the replacement of headphones lies with the producers of headphones w/o changeable power source, not with the phone.

And regarding availability in the US: i have the suspicion that the average european will be much more inclined to pay the 2-300$ upmark in price just for greener tech than the average american. i'm sure that they would love to sell more phones, but it's not ecological or economical to ship them onto a continent where 80-90% of people would either compare specs only and cannot afford to go for a more sustainable phone or - a predominantly USA thing - who revel in the fact that their choice is not ecological.

[-] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 3 points 9 hours ago

What about headphones with a replaceable cable? Higher quality cables usually last longer aswell

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
990 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

71922 readers
3683 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS