1103
Every theater (lemmy.world)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kamen@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

Also, 20 minute "trailers" before the actual movie.

[-] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 4 points 4 hours ago

I remember when trailer were a big deal. People went to see a movie they didn't care for just for the trailer. I haven't watched a trailer for like 15 years and it's nice when they don't tell you the whole movie before you saw it.

[-] Bravo@eviltoast.org 8 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

When I was a kid in the 90s, the 70s were in vogue and if you wanted to be retro it meant the 70s. That 70s Show for example, plus N-Trance doing all those old disco remixes, plus Dazed and Confused, plus Almost Famous, plus the disco songs in The Full Monty, etc.

And in the 70s, retro chic meant the 50s, what with Grease and American Graffiti (which was actually set in 1962 but was still about the 50s aesthetic) and Happy Days etc. So it seemed like "retro" meant "20 years ago".

How, in 25 years, have we only advanced to the 80s for retro chic? Shouldn't we be on the 90s by now at least, if not the 00s?

PS: perhaps this is indicative of a reduction in cultural influence, today, for the 20-to-30-something demographic, compared to the cultural influence that demographic had in earlier decades. Quentin Tarantino was 29 when he made Reservoir Dogs so he made a movie steeped in 70s vibes. Because in the 90s that age range was where revolutionary thinkers were expected to come from, so naturally the decade of their childhoods, the 70s, was in vogue. Do today's 29-year-olds have the same platform and opportunities?

[-] Gsus4@mander.xyz 6 points 14 hours ago

Movies in the '90s were more varied, but then after 9/11 and the "war on terror" it seems that there was an intentional focus on superheroes fighting the bad guys, don't know about the '80s.

[-] edg@lemmy.world 1 points 55 minutes ago

Probably, but CGI maturing and becoming cheaper may have played a larger role.

[-] Bravo@eviltoast.org 8 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Probably not a coincidence that most Golden Age superheroes were created around the beginning of WWII:

  • Superman 1938

  • Batman 1939

  • Captain Marvel/Shazam 1939

  • The Human Torch 1939

  • Namor the Sub-Mariner 1939

  • The Flash 1939

  • Captain America 1940

  • Green Lantern 1940

  • Wonder Woman 1941

[-] jaxxed@lemmy.ml 4 points 17 hours ago
[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 2 points 40 minutes ago

It's also a movie theater, and it's not uncommon to omit the "movie" part since they're more common.

[-] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Why spend time and money making new things when tried and true stuff sells just as well?

Welcome to capitalism, where art goes to die.

[-] pungar@lemmy.wtf 7 points 1 day ago

But someone said capitalism fostered innovation!?

[-] glitchdx@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

it can, but requires strong regulation to do so. We don't have that these days.

[-] _AutumnMoon_ 10 points 1 day ago

And the Talking Animals will either be the best option or the worst option

[-] chrislowles@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago

And coming soon! The one midnight showing of the indie movie everyone secretly wants to watch.

[-] mlg@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago
[-] Gsus4@mander.xyz 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Yeah, e.g. I stopped paying attention to spider man movies for a few years, but the other day I was doing a recap and found that there is a movie with actors/characters from 3 different versions/reboots with the multiverse excuse...this is some dystopian shit.

I know that comics always had heavy intertext and "guest characters", but having the scriptwriting be driven by stupid circumstantial corporate decisions to buy IP rights to a specific character and then have to restart it multiple times to keep the rights going feels...dystopian?

(but I'll be thankful if you have any better words than dystopian to describe this bullshit, gpt suggests "soulless" 🙃).

[-] bramkaandorp@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago

Dune messiah a franchise exploit? How?

It's based on the next book in the series. There is a reason for it to exist beyond making money.

[-] glitchdx@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

anyone who was in for the love of the art already read the books.

[-] bramkaandorp@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Meaning what, that movie adaptations are not necessary? I know that.

The posted list put Dune in with movies that were made based purely on the success of their predecessor, which is not the case for Dune.

Now, while the sequel wouldn't have been made if its predecessor hadn't been successful, the books are the driver behind making the movies.

[-] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

This is a lazy meme, I've seen dozens of original movies both foreign and domestic in the last few months, people don't want to go to the theatre for anything other than IP blockbusters and then complain that IP blockbusters keep getting made, change your habits first

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 81 points 1 day ago

The best stuff at a cinema is rarely plastered all over the front, that's just advertising for people who don't really care about movies.

Also if your area is like mine, look for the smaller cinemas that screen the new oddities and forgotten classics

[-] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Depends on your town. I live in a small tourist town with one cinema and they only play the biggest hits, focusing on the lowest common denominator. I mean, I'm not even sure they screened Sinners, but they definitely played The Minecraft Movie in 4 (out of 14) theaters for months. If I want to go to a different cinema, I have to drive 45 minutes to get to the next town (where the selection still sucks, but at least they've got more screens) or 75 min to get to the closest independent theater.

[-] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Exactly, support your independent theatre's, they are usually run by people who care about cinema and they have more shows for older classics and modern indies and foreign movies

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

Well with new Jurassic park/world stuff coming out, there's 90s stuff going on, too.

[-] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 4 points 1 day ago
[-] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago

Never even saw an ad for it but, then again, who watches ads anymore? Good reviews? Can't trust them, most are bots nowadays.

Just as well, people are so broke they don't want to risk spending money on something they don't know when they can watch a remake of a story they know they enjoy or just don't have money to even go to the movies at all.

Gotta love that capitalist innovation and the "invisible hand if the market" at work.

[-] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 2 points 1 day ago

My favourite thing about movies is that a movie that makes 10million dollars is a flop. It could make 100millions and now we're sad and can only afford to make a cheap remake

[-] GooberEar@lemmy.wtf 33 points 1 day ago

This is just so inaccurate. Sometimes it's 90's reboots and remakes with talking animals, too.

[-] Zorsith 14 points 1 day ago

And now, Disneys latest innovation: Live action(ish) reboots with talking animals!

[-] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

It's like when games fail and people complain there is no originality

Dude you ain't buying the original games, you are buying the tried and trusted versions

[-] hypeerror@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

It's one film. Howard the Duck.

[-] socsa@piefed.social 19 points 1 day ago

Are the talking animals sexy?

[-] lordnikon@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

They still have a few the low budget horror films and originals by Soderberg but no one watches them even when they are really good. I go every week and don't watch any remakes and maybe the occasional superhero flick when it reviews well. There are maybe 9 people in the theater.

[-] ech@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago

It's so annoying to see this shit. Every person who complains about how stale movie releases are only ever goes to see what the ads on tv/youtube tell them to, then whine about their own choice while excellent indie movies eke by or fail outright. They reinforce the problem they complain about with zero sense of hypocrisy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

HEY what do they have against talking animals

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Eukaryotes should be seen and not heard.

[-] magic_lobster_party@fedia.io 16 points 1 day ago

I’m looking forward to the coming superhero universe reboot - now with fun CGI animal.

[-] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago

Made with AI

[-] roserose56@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The are movies like Never look away(2018), Amanda(2018), Empire of Light(2022) and Perfect Days (2023) that where barely advertised, but worth watching all the way. Still somehow using an old movie or having more super hero is ok.

[-] Mothra@mander.xyz 15 points 1 day ago

They're doing 90s and post 2000s remakes now . See Lilo and Stitch and How to Train your Dragon remakes with 3d and live action incorporated that nobody asked for. I think originality in film and tv is also disappearing, along with many other things heading towards extinction these days

[-] magic_lobster_party@fedia.io 15 points 1 day ago

Originality is uncertainty, and shareholders don’t like uncertainty. Better to spend the money on certain failures instead.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Best thing is that internet and technology development has brought us masterpieces like this:

https://youtu.be/bl8Z7Dl7P9A

[-] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 10 points 2 days ago

Superhero sequel 29 looks pretty good this year!

[-] graycube@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

The Phoenician Scheme was fairly original.

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Wes Anderson movies are both original and not at all original. The stories are original, but the style is always the same. That said, I love his style, but recently his movies have almost parodies of themselves. I haven't enjoyed his latest stuff.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Raul Julia playing Mr Bison was peak cinema, no one can take away from us

Also Peter Weller playing robocop was peak acting. Dude made everyone feel all sorts of emotions just by lip gesticulation

[-] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

ITT: movie opinions based on movie advertisements for the circle jerk instead of seeking movie announcements or even, retroactively, awards/nominations. But I get it, you know what the next Superman is going to be so it's easy to have an opinion on it without seeing it whereas the other half of the movies are original... but risky for your use of time.

Cue complaints about rigged awards stealing from better movies without acknowledging it's a showdown between multiple original movies.

Cue complaints about popcorn pricing as if you're forced to eat popcorn and eat popcorn for every home movie

Cue complaints about gross movie theaters as if this is really about the originality of movies instead of a likely attention span issue

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
1103 points (100.0% liked)

Comic Strips

17590 readers
1058 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS