397

Cross-posted from "Liberals right now..." by @return2ozma@lemmy.world in !politicalmemes@lemmy.world


all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FundMECFSResearch 49 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Capitalism is violence. Having billionaires while people starve is violence. Denying healthcare while spending billions on military is violence. Supplying weapons or finances to states commiting genocide is violence.

Right now, if you are passive, you are complicit in immense amounts of violence.

Somehow this is lost on liberals. (Or alternatively they believe the once every 4 years elite propaganda contest [elections] or strongly worded petitions are the only effective ways of dissent).

[-] SkyeStarfall 9 points 1 month ago

Seriously! I don't understand why this is such a hard concept to grasp

Just because it's a passive or hidden violence, or done from a complete disregard of people, doesn't make it less violent towards the affected

It's like the whole thing of how "murder is bad but war is acceptable". Like, why is one perceived so different just because it's state sanctioned? It's considered abhorrent to talk about violently removing a war criminal from their position of harm. It's complete nonsense

[-] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

But what if i get table scraps from the violence and so don't want to get rid of it because i like my treats?

[-] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Okay but uts not violence if i don't consider them people, or have to think for a second to assign accountability to a specific person.

[-] pcgaldo@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 month ago

Could be. Stopping working for the system, with massive strikes. There is nothing they fear more. But they will exercise violence first, have no doubt. They are the lords and masters of violence. With violence they have the upper hand. A difficult situation to manage.

[-] itslilith 25 points 1 month ago

History has shown us again and again that when capital feels threatened, it gets violent anyways. Look at how many strikes have been beaten down, shot or even bombed (look it up, the first plane-dropped bombs in the US were dropped on striking miners)

I dislike violence, and I don't think it's good strategy to start it (that's why I'm a syndicalist), but realistically, we should be ready for the reaction.

[-] RedSnt@feddit.dk 11 points 1 month ago

look it up, the first plane-dropped bombs in the US were dropped on striking miners

Lest we forget about the Black Wall Street massacre.

[-] itslilith 7 points 1 month ago

Fair enough. 1921 truly was a good year to bomb the american people, it would seem

[-] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

God, the best year for bombing american civilians. 2025 is looking pretty promising though.

[-] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Actually might've been on black people getting money in oklahoma. I forget which was first.

[-] itslilith 2 points 1 month ago

Someone else linked that, the Tulsa massacre was indeed a couple of months earlier

[-] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Okay, months, i feel better not knowing it was sooner.

[-] msage@programming.dev 6 points 1 month ago

You need stockpiles of food, water and heat.

But yes, this is the way.

[-] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago

It won't be violent if the ruling class don't make it violent.

That is to say, it will be violent.

[-] plyth@feddit.org 7 points 1 month ago

Easiest trick: Show two options, let people pick a side and then pitch them against each other.

The problem is complex enough that both options are hammers that won't help to repair a watch.

[-] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Most are just too afraid to say they're afraid, perhaps, which is a more understandable position.

[-] slamminsalmon@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago

lol

Please tell us which achievable violent action you would take that would work to change the system. Please be specific and tell me how this action would facilitate change.

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 month ago
[-] slamminsalmon@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago

lol

So you have no idea what violence you're advocating for, you just want someone to do it. Sounds like a project 2025 talking point to me. Either do your violence or stfu about it. Stop trying to undermine the resistance to Trump.

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 month ago

Yeah man, you're right. People should absolutely criminally implicate themselves online for you enjoyment. 'fuck outta here.

[-] jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago

lol. you're a moron. fuck off.

[-] delgato@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

Short of straight-out illegal actions there is a lot of civic disobedience that organized groups of people could do. In this day and age maybe it will be construed as illegal, but goes beyond the conventional notion of protest.

[-] rustyfish@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Avada Kedavra ain’t violence.

[-] shades@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

“murder is bad but war is acceptable”.

War isn't acceptable, that doesn't mean the other guy with plenty of guns isn't going to war with/at you.

this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2025
397 points (100.0% liked)

Flippanarchy

1443 readers
54 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS