1183
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Wilshire@lemm.ee to c/ukraine@sopuli.xyz
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] expected_crayon@lemmy.world 338 points 1 year ago

Yet he’s taking DoD money for Starlink in Ukraine. At what point do his antics turn from the craziness of a billionaire to espionage and being deemed a Russian asset?

[-] demlet@lemmy.world 137 points 1 year ago

Musk openly stated that he spoke directly with Putin after the Ukraine invasion had started. The super wealthy have no loyalties and will sell anyone and anything to the highest bidder. I've said it before, every penny after $1 billion needs to be taxed at 100%. Time to reign in the oligarchs.

[-] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

But then who would create the underpaying jobs?!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)
[-] thann@lemmy.world 91 points 1 year ago

Imagine if Lockheed martin "shut off" a jet because it was "getting too close to China"

What would be the response by the DOJ?

I would think the military would call that an act of treason and imprison or disappear any executives they thought were involved

[-] DarkenLM@kbin.social 76 points 1 year ago

It would be hilarious for the US and/or the EU freeze his assets and punch his market influence to the ground if they accuse him of espionage.

[-] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 101 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nationalizing the satellites that we paid for as a national security asset sure seems reasonable here, seeing as he likely broke a contract when he disabled them.

Imagine if Lockheed disabled an allied F16's targeting computer during a mission; there would be hell to pay.

[-] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

I've said in the past that something was clearly wrong when he bought Twitter. His behavior was far too targeted. It's all way too obvious.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Heisme@lemmy.world 179 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The spin at the end is just fluffy bullshit. Starlink, from the get go, has had bandwidth reserved for military operations albeit US military operation but military operations nonetheless. The real question here is how and why did he know that operation was happening and what other operations has he known about/thwarted/or knowingly or unknowingly passed along information about.

[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 42 points 1 year ago

Maybe the same FSB agents that were driving his paranoia. Assuming they knew about the attack, they could get a bigger win by stopping it and removing Starlink from the equation at the same time, than by stopping the attack with military means.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Heresy_generator@kbin.social 162 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

“How am I in this war?” Musk asks Isaacson. “Starlink was not meant to be involved in wars. It was so people can watch Netflix and chill and get online for school and do good peaceful things, not drone strikes.”

Musk, transparent as ever, makes sure to tell his biographer that it's about peace, man, and has nothing to do with his love of authoritarian regimes.

[-] Sinnz@feddit.de 76 points 1 year ago

Nothing more peaceful than supporting an authoritarian war criminal 🥰

[-] TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago

“How am I in this war?”

Bitch, you put yourself there!

[-] el_doso@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

And a shit eating little shoe-horn of the phrase "Netflix and chill".

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Didn't his company supply a bunch of Starlinks because of the war? Was he expecting Ukranians needed to watch more Netflix and do more school stuff while getting bombed out by the Ruzzians? What a crock

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 120 points 1 year ago

Musk was reportedly motivated to foil the attack out of concern that a strike on Crimea would constitute a “mini-Pearl Harbor” and lead to Russia retaliating with nuclear weapons

So glad the blue-checks get to dictate our foreign policy now.

What was all that DoD money for? A suggestion box?

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago

Not like Russia invading Ukraine was a mini pearl harbor, nooooooo not that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 97 points 1 year ago

Isn't it illegal to screw with the military actions of the U.S. ... and its allies?!!?

[-] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't think what he did was illegal per se, but he is definitely positioning himself against US geopolitical interests, which is a really bad idea if you are a US citizen, living in the United States. If he were to give away any military secrets that pass through star link, which I'm sure Russia will inevitably ask him to do, he will get arrested for espionage. He should tread very carefully.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 94 points 1 year ago

Why are enemies of the United States allowed to own national security infrastructure?

[-] owlinsight@lemm.ee 96 points 1 year ago

They are allowed to be president and run for re-election too so I wouldn't hold my breath

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 64 points 1 year ago

Arrest this treasonous scumbag. Slava Ukraini!

[-] AphoticDev@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 1 year ago

As much as I despise Musk for being a total piece of shit, this isn't treason. Technically, we aren't even allies with Ukraine. The argument could certainly be made that this works against the interests of the United States, but that alone isn't treason because it isn't a crime for citizens to oppose the US, especially when it's private property the US is being lent. Because at that time, the US hadn't signed a contract with Musk yet.

If he did this again, then it would be a breach of contract, but still wouldn't be treason. People being charged with treason is very rare, because it's a such a high bar to meet.

[-] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 46 points 1 year ago

This guy aided the Kremlin. He's helping russians in their genocide of Ukrainian children. Fuck that pile of shit and lock him up.

[-] AphoticDev@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 year ago

I agree. I'm just saying, he's not guilty of treason.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Fapper_McFapper@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] _number8_@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago

this is starting to give comic book villan

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 55 points 1 year ago
[-] Wollang@sh.itjust.works 55 points 1 year ago

Took longer than I thought it would for Musk to do this. Been waiting for it since he threw his little fit about starlink in Ukraine was costing him money.

Then he said he’s talked to Putin directly.

Seriously someone reign this dude in, somehow, before he really fucks shit up.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

As if I needed another reason to hate this piece of shit.

[-] majormoron@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

Traitor to Democracy, at it's worst. I see he wants to join Lex Luthor at Amazon. What's the closest villian comparison for someone like Elmo?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

If I was Ukrainian, I would say that makes Elon a combatant.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

OP linked to a site that regosted half of the original article, so here's the full one:

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/politics/elon-musk-biography-walter-isaacson-ukraine-starlink/index.html

[-] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 33 points 1 year ago
[-] sculd@beehaw.org 32 points 1 year ago

Seriously the US needs to take Starlink away from Musk. Its a national security issue at this point.

[-] BioDriver@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fuuuuuuck Elon Musk

ETA: he said he did it to avoid a nuclear attack. Everybody with two brain cells to rub together knows this is an empty threat from Putin, so either Elon is an idiot or he’s lying.

Likely both.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] acastcandream@beehaw.org 27 points 1 year ago

Mr. Free Speech wants to decide what we can and can’t use our ISP’s for eh?

[-] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Not that I expect a single damn thing to happen, but isn't this the definition of treason?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 25 points 1 year ago

Man the old geezers really think they still have absolute control over everything and don't realize the ultra wealthy they have enabled are getting and have been operating far beyond the control of the western governments.

God the fucking narcissism of those in charge to think that they still rule with perfect wisdom. I'm waiting for when these companies that the US built leave and take up residence with new hot authoritarian countries and leave misery poverty in their wake.

Singular rich people should not have this much say.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Holy shit! I'm guessing fighting (even in an EW capacity) for a US adversary is actually a criminal offence, or something similar.

Thanks for the original source, OP. It's hard to trust just a headline these days.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
1183 points (100.0% liked)

Ukraine

8260 readers
318 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW


Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS