695
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PotatoLibre@feddit.it 246 points 1 week ago

This scenario is quite the best outcome. Two narcissists fighting each other, hopong for a homicide/suicide ❤️

[-] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago

The war of the attention whores has begun...

[-] msprout@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago

I kept seeing people saying that this is all performative and that they're both in on it, but idk, I was raised by narcissists and this is basically the exact same fight playing out on the global stage that played out weekly in my childhood living room.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yep, same, exactly.

This is way, way too in depth to be an elaborately staged, intetional hyperreality performance.

These two just actually are this stupid, this self-centered, this insecure and ego driven.

If this is some kind of an act, it would require both of them to have been method acting at Daniel Day Lewis levels for about a decade with no breaks.

Its 'performative' in the sense of intentionally being catty, shit-disturbing, dramatic, old men acting like the cast of the Mean Girls... but it is not performative in the sense of 'entirely staged to fool us dumb rubes.'

That being said, this all still does function as a grand distraction to any other person or kind of nefarious nonsense... but no, these two are having the messiest, most high stakes, most public breakup in probably the history of the world right now, and they are both totally genuine.

... It is also arguably the funniest way concievable for the American Empire / Era to end.

How in the fuck do you write a history book about this in 20 years?

... I don't fucking know, but I do know I want Larry David to write a script for a 'The Death of Stalin' style movie about the last 9 months.

EDIT: Wait! Mel Brooks is still alive somefucking how, get in him in the writing room too!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zagam 10 points 1 week ago

Even if it was pretend to start with they're both so sensitive and need to be right, it'll turn into a real fight soon enough. But I agree, neither is clever enough to pretend this. For that you need professional wrestling level acting skills.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Photuris@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago

Alien vs. Predator.

Whoever loses, we win.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] SirMaple__@lemmy.ca 99 points 1 week ago
[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 85 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Sadly enough, this won't escalate into anything because Musk didn't exactly have a lot of friends in the GOP even when Trump's head was crammed shoulder-deep in his ass. He was only tolerated because the GOP had no other real choice, and they didn't want to risk him funding a primary challenger. He has lots of money but no actual political clout. Which means I doubt there's going to be a bunch of Republicans suddenly jumping to Team Musk.

He'll probably go the Liz Cheney route of just being ostracized by everybody. But hey, it'll be a hell of a lot of fun watching all this shit in the meantime.

[-] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago

I don’t know. He’s got tons of money and politicians are like flies to shit with money.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Which means I doubt there’s going to be a bunch of Republicans suddenly jumping to Team Musk.

GOP grifters avoiding the biggest pile of money to grift, and you're confident grifters will actively avoid it? I'm not so sure. I'm betting a number of opportunistic GOP will sign up on the Musk train if it means getting a paycheck/personal superpac donation.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Gsus4@mander.xyz 71 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Anybody have any idea what they're trying to hide with this puppet show? Is the big bill getting too much attention or is it something else?

[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago

I think you're giving them too much credit. I'm pretty sure this really is just a senile old man feuding with a ketamine addict.

[-] plz1@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

It can and likely is both.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] cymbal_king@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago

There was news today that the Senate is considering cutting Medicare in addition to Medicaid, as well as news of major changes to how science funding is sent out to researchers. Also the travel bans for foreign nationals from certain countries.

[-] Gsus4@mander.xyz 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago

So let me get that straight, you spent hundreds of millions of dollars to get a guy, who you think should be impeached and is guilty of underage sex, to be the president of the United States?

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

He KNEW about the underage sex stuff when he spent the nearly 300 billion dollars too.

[-] Vinstaal0@feddit.nl 51 points 1 week ago

I have this feeling that JD Vance is way worse than Trump

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

He is much worse, but he's also far less of a threat, as he doesn't have ANY public mandate, in the form of any kind of following or cultish fandom.

Trump's power is almost ENTIRELY a product of how he tapped into the country's stupid fucking redneck hogs and narcissists and delusional conspiracy nuts. JD has exactly ZERO flat-earthers driving around with his face painted on the side of their van. Having a following of millions of people, even if they are mentally-deficient to a degree that is literally breathtaking, is still power, a great deal of power too because he has them under such tight control.

Vance might be dangerous in short-term policy decisions, but he doesn't have electoral power, he doesn't have chips in the game, he won't make a dent in senate/house bill votes, he won't have influence on local and state elections. He's pre-neutered. The only ones who should be worried about Vance are the white-house sofas.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] aceshigh@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago

Yes, but he won’t be backed up by maga. There will be more internal fighting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 15 points 1 week ago

Vance is totally owned by Peter Theil, who is a well-known Psychopathic Oligarch.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] TheDeadlySquid@lemm.ee 47 points 1 week ago

Is this a massive gamble by Elmo to rebuild his brand image by forcing me to agree with him on certain issues? Let’s not forget this was the same guy Nazi saluting this dude at his Inauguration a few short months ago.

[-] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago

No, its not. Musk is just salty Trump used and discarded him. You have to understand, these are just children who stumbled into power and never really grew up.

[-] andros_rex@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Yeah - nepo babies are like this. Made the mistake of marrying one, and any perceived slight needed punishment and retaliation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] trumboner@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Can we have both of these? Please please please?

  • Trump impeached
  • Musk deported
[-] Rakonat@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

I know there is some clause or stipulation that allows for the seizure of assets obtained by illegal immigrants.

Musk is an illegal immigrant who pursued business ventures in violation of his school visa and lied about it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] powermaker450@discuss.tchncs.de 42 points 1 week ago
[-] BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago

Consider this, JD Vance is Peter Thiel's Acolyte, who desperately wants to bring about a global technocracy. What if all of this hasn't been a genuine attempt yet. What if it's merely theatre that has been setting the stage for Vance to take over. Trump gets to enrich his family beyond their wildest imagination, then he peaces out and the real horror begins.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 week ago

This is like hearing the school saying the two biggest bullies are going to fight in the yard after school

Everyone knows that one of them can't hit any thing harder than a pillow and the other always chickens out against any opponent unless the person they'll punch is held down by four guys.

The entire school knows that this shit show is a circus that will just be full of drama and no fighting .... but we're all going to head out onto the yard anyway to laugh at how stupid these idiots are going perform.

I'll see you all on the yard after the last bell at 3pm

[-] MehBlah@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Who could see this coming said that one clueless guy who didn't.

[-] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I was waiting for those two to fall out. Two egos this big were always going to clash sooner or later. This will be entertaining and hopefully damaging to both of them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BarrierWithAshes@fedia.io 18 points 1 week ago

He also tweeted a few hours ago that he's thinking of starting a new political party (for the 80%?). Imagine if he Ross-Perots the next election. Either that or he becomes so petty he starts primary-ing Trump supporters in the House. He has a lot of options. Though I don't expect much is gonna come out of it. Probably throw a few more shots to Trump to repair Tesla's image and take a break from politics.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

There's some major schadenfreude in this, but never forget all of the damage that DOGE did to the government & countless numbers of its loyal employees.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 16 points 1 week ago

What I really love about this is that Trump is so narcissistic that he earnestly believed that Elon liked him. That he believed in his vision for the country and that he wouldn't want anything in return, like a load more juicy government contracts, a bill to mandate that petrol cars would be phased out, or all safety regulations about self driving cars to be torn up.

Bless his cold dead heart for being exactly what everybody knows he is. Everybody except those idiots who jump into bed with him, because all those other people he betrayed were losers who just weren't smart enough.

[-] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Mommy and daddy are fighting. 🫠

[-] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 week ago

This man is an ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT who needs to Be Deported!

-People who Gargled Elon's Balls yesterday!

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 13 points 1 week ago

Imagine thinking his voice matters more than Thiel's voice.

[-] Anonymaus@feddit.org 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Lol like they are gonna do that. Usa are the most incompetent nation in the world, they just watch as their 'democracy' disintegrates into fascism

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

I really loathe narcistic billionaires and hate paying any attention to them at all. But 2 narcisstic billionaires fighting each other? That I like to watch.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Jolly_Platypus@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

If anyone could make a conviction happen, it's Musk. He need only threaten to fund primary challengers for 10 Republicans in the house and ~15 senators.

He's got the money to do it.

[-] megopie 10 points 1 week ago

Lmao, two idiots fighting. This seemed kind of inevitable, they’re not compatible personality types to work with each other.

Elon definitely thinks he has more influence with trump’s crowd than he actually has, but I also think his position at twitter makes him dangerous to trump by undermining his ability to reach a lot of people who haven’t fully crawled down the maga conspiracy pipeline.

I don’t think he’s going to be able to shift much support to Vance ether. Vance and his ilk are just to weird for most trump supporters.

[-] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

Did the simulation break?

This is so fucking bizzare.

Some truman-show shit to see how we (the non-actors of this world) react.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

And leave JD Vance in charge?! Are you mad?! Can we just nuke the line of succession?

[-] joel_feila@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Next week headline "musk dead from ketimine overdose, that caused him fall on some bullettes"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
695 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24139 readers
3120 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS