574
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Lime66@lemmy.world 82 points 1 week ago

Inaccurate. That house has decent structural integrity despite being a cruel joke made by the architect, vibe code could never

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 9 points 1 week ago

Locks probably work too.

[-] davad@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Hmm, I dunno if that's a fair comparison. That house might be structurally sound and just look weird.

[-] roofuskit@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

A vibe coder's house equivalently would have collapsed on the person who purchased it as soon as the closed the door behind them.

[-] Donkter@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

Does it stay up? Yes.

Can you sleep in it? Technically

Does it have running electricity and water? (Optional anyway)

Another big win for vibe coders. Pack it up, we're taking the W home.

[-] AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago

Groverhaus is a vibe coder built house. Load bearing drywall.

[-] Tja@programming.dev 12 points 1 week ago

If this house took 2 days to build and costs 5k, I'll take it.

[-] twopi@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

In this market absolutely. One could easily flip it to $500k in a couple days.

[-] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

Well, if all "AI houses" suddenly cost 5k all around, you wouldn't flip it, but I would gladly live in one of them if I can stop paying rent/mortgage.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago

Talking to my structural engineer friend about the way we build software makes him sad every time. And I'm not even talking about vibe coding. Yet.

[-] squaresinger@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago
[-] andybytes@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago

"schizophrenic little children with auto-immune diseases and we don’t beat them when they’re bad." Hahahahah

[-] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

This is literally the difference between me and my wife ;)

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

You absolutely can regex (some) html if you sanitize and maybe convert it beforehand.

Btw, why are parsers always built to support the whole thing and maybe throw an error on or just consume unsupported shenanigans? That's how you get security vulnerabilities in picture formats. Instead of just picking the things you support and ignoring the rest.

[-] squaresinger@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

You always have to balance: Do you want the user to have "some" user experience, or none at all.

In the case of image viewers or browsers or stuff, it's most often better to show the user something, even if it isn't perfect, than to show nothing at all. Especially if it's an user who can't do anything to fix the broken thing at all.

That said, if the user is a developer who is currently developing the solution, then the parser should be as strict as possible, because the developer can fix stuff before it goes into production.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

Did you tell him about fuzzers yet?

[-] SalamenceFury@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

That house looks like it's begging to be mercy killed.

[-] HakunaHafada@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

I'm sure the owner's laptop has Windows on it, too.

I'll see myself out....

[-] floo@retrolemmy.com 6 points 1 week ago

False: it is not also on fire. That’s how I can tell this is AI.

[-] Deebster@infosec.pub 1 points 1 week ago

I'm not sure I understand your reply, but if your second sentence is saying that this image is AI-generated then you might like to know that this building is in Belgium and there's other photos online.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I kinda like escher’s work…. And this is giving off those vibes…

[-] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Escher used a lot of repeating patterns. This is more like a Picasso.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I was kinda referring to the impossible shapes and dimensional illusions Escher used. Like this one:

[-] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Sure, I could see that. But on the other hand, this is ostensibly a photo of a building that exists IRL, so clearly it can't be topologically impossible in an Escher-esque way.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

It's like Winchester House, but with windows...

[-] frezik@midwest.social 5 points 1 week ago

That house is in the "so bad, it's good" category. Vibe coders can only aspire to such things.

[-] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

That's $400k worth of house and $500k worth of windows. Lotta big custom glass in there.

[-] VitabytesDev@feddit.nl 2 points 1 week ago

So much about vibe coding and yet I have not seen any (working) application or project made by utilizing it.

Well, I wonder why...

[-] katze@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 week ago

That is an accurate representation of my projects. I'm not a vibe coder 😭

[-] umbraroze@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

Reminds me of the time when AI image generation was new, and someone generated a bunch of screwed up road intersections with stuff like circular crosswalks and whatnot. Everyone was like "humans can't fix the traffic, but don't worry, computers can't fix it either." ...I think about it a lot.

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 1 points 1 week ago

That looks like the Hundertwasserhaus’s evil twin

Looks like an AI's failed attempt to generate an image of a house lol

this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
574 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

24241 readers
1913 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS