He's not just trolling MAGA, he's trolling the media. Now they have to make a choice as to which event they cover. Do they cover the Pope, and his anti-MAGA message, or do they cover HitlerPig's latest empty flex?
I am so happy he is using his power to bridge differences and create unity /s
You don't unite with cancer, you excise it.
The classic refrain... Unfortunately for you, people are starting to recognize (again) that this is bullshit and Nazis have no place in society.
Unifying against fascists is a good thing.
There is no "unity" with Nazis. They need to be purged.
Since when did US pres had military parade
When we became a shit hole authoritarian nation like what we were taught in school how the United States was better than them
CCP = GOP
Since the us population elected an imbecilic dictator.
Since never. This sort of thing was more popular in the USSR. The US is moving in that direction, though.
Sounds like a large protest in crime-addled Chicago is about to get shut down by ICE.
If it's mostly white people they'll have a hard time.
you’ve not been paying attention to ICE lately huh?
Yeah, like, his fascism jubilee isn't going to be in Chicago, so this article is just hunting for clicks.
But the media is going to split coverage. There will be very direct comparisons of crowd sizes. Some people will have to decide which event to attend, as they can't attend both.
The last part is the most important.
The pope coming to America is always a big deal. He's explicitly calling on American Catholics to choose sides.
The only kind of MAGA I enjoy seeing is a raging pissed off MAGA, crying with impotent boomer rage. Go Leo!
Now we just need to get some old bands back together and surround DC with aged rockers and rappers talking shit about felon 47.
If he wasn’t a sexist and a homophobe I’d actually like that guy. But Catholics have a long history of misrepresenting scripture to suit their political purposes, and centuries of bad habits are hard to break.
The scriptures themselves are misogynistic and homophobic. The religion is rotten.
Judeo-Christian scriptures are many things, including misogynistic (women are literally considered property), but they are not, and never have been, homophobic. Not defending them, just pointing out one of those fun facts that gets overlooked because people accept what they’re told - including in the form of compromised translations - without ever raising a finger to confirm if it’s accurate. They want to believe it, so they do.
The Bible is explicitly anti-homosexual.
“The Bible” doesn’t exist. It’s a collection of disparate works by many different authors, from different cultures, over hundreds-to-thousands of years. Despite that, there is not a single “anti-homosexual” line anywhere in it. The word itself does not even exist in any of the original texts. Translations that include the word “homosexual” have deliberately mistranslated… and English translations in particular are especially guilty of this.
Again, I am not defending the many heinous things in those texts, I am pointing out how they have been abused, misused, and twisted by a corrupt political power for it’s own benefit.
But when it says to stone gay dudes to death, you have to read it in cOnTeXt! And there’s a handful of fringe theologians who think they were actually just talking about gay pedo rapists!
And I mean who knows, maybe they want to get the gays high. You know, stoned. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The pope is catholic. The catholic bible is definately homophobic. It has multiple references to a man lying with a man, and man treating a man as a woman.
It talks about incestuously raping your male slaves (but female slaves are fine if you follow some extra rules), about raping children, and about temple prostitution. None of those things concern homosexuality, particularly monogamous, consensual, not-of-the-same-household same-sex relationships.
The catholic church has twisted those things into something completely different than what they say. But we have those texts in their original languages and they are pretty darn clear. I’m amazed the church has gotten away with it for so long… but then they do have a policy of “what the church says is as good as scripture” so…
The mental gymnastics you people will go through to avoid facing reality... Sad.
So the proscription against gays sex in leviticus, the description of "shameful acts" in romans 26-28, or the condemnation in corinthians and timothy are what exactly?
You may want to believe, and want me to believe, that these do not exist or are always mistranslated, but I can't believe that without evidence.
I'm also not sure why you separate the original texts from the modern circulating translations.
The bible is a living collection which is added to and removed from over time. It is what Christians believe it to be. If most Christians are using faulty translations, that is the bible.
Name one Christian denomination that doesn't have a history of using scripture for political purposes.
I'm not saying misrepresenting because that's an obvious sola scriptura protestant lens, that obviously doesn't apply to non protestants.
Organized religion is a racket. I’m not defending it, I’m pointing out that they don’t even know their own source material.
As an atheist I don't really have skin in the game, but unorganized religion can also be a racket. At least with organized religion there can exist some degree of accountability, whereas with new age quacks there is nothing.
I bet 110% media coverage will be in DC
AntiTrumpAlliance
About
An alliance among all who oppose Donald Trump's actions, positions, cabinet, supporters, policies, or motives. This alliance includes anyone from the left or the right; anyone from any religion or lack thereof; anyone from any country or state; any man, woman or child.
Rules
-No pro-Trump posts or comments
-No off topic posts
-Be civil
-No trolling
-Follow Lemmy terms of service
Social Media
Other Communities
!desantisthreatensusa@lemmy.world