287

I tried explaining my problems with tankies without calling them tankies. In fact, I used their own terminology to describe my disagreement with them. It, uh... well it doesn't make a lot of sense.

George Orwell fought in the Spanish civil war on the side of the Marxists. His army was betrayed by the Marxist-Leninists. After that experience, he wrote 1984, in which a totalitarian government uses "newspeak" to suppress dissent by suppressing the very ideas that people are capable of communicating. I don't think it's a coincidence that Marxist-Leninists describe their disagreements in terms that turn criticism of them into gibberish. I think it's exactly what Orwell was writing about based on his experiences.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 26 points 3 days ago

When people say Communism had never been tried it's because communism is the end goal. It's the place we want to get to. A stateless, moneyless, classless society where everyone is truly equal. That's the ideal.

And Socialism is how we get there. Socialism is a scientific method of governance. It's not the insanity of "free-markets" nor is it the dictate of an autocrat. You need hospitals. You put the force of govt behind building hospitals and staffing them. You have a giant landmass so you need mass transit. You don't twiddle your thumbs waiting for the market winds to blow just right. You invest in building it. Because you need it. Because it's good for your people.

[-] Genius@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

CATALUNYA TRIOMFANT
OUR LAND WILL BE BOUNTIFUL AGAIN
SO DESTROY THE ENEMY
THEIR CONCEIT HAS SENTENCED THEM TO DEATH

RAISE UP YOUR SCYTHES!
RAISE UP YOUR SCYTHES!
RAISE UP YOUR SCYTHES, DEFENDERS OF THE LAND!

[-] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

What? No, it's specifically Anarchists who want to speed run straight to communism. Marxists want to seize the state and guide it through a transitional stage (often called Socialism), which will end in the withering away of the state, and thus lead to Communism.

This was the whole nature of the split in the First International between Marx and Proudhoun.

To your point about Orwell, bringing up 1984 doesn't make a ton of sense here, as that's a book that is much more about fascism. Case in point, Immanuel Goldstein, the avatar of everything that Oceania opposes, is a man with a Jewish name.

Animal Farm, meanwhile, comes from Orwell's experience in the Spanish Civil War, where he was largely embedded with the Partido Obrero de Unificación Marxista (POUM). The POUM were more ideology diverse than history gives them credit for, but was largely composed of what we would today consider Trotskyists.

That experience, coupled with his experience as a journalist during WW2, unable to publish his trotskyist influenced criticisms of the USSR due to wartime state repression, ultimately lead him to write Animal Farm.

The Stalin analogue pig is named Napoleon in large part due to debates between MLs and Trotskyists about the nature of world historical revolutions, since their only point of comparison was France, which ended up with Napoleon in charge. Was Stalin a Napoleon of Socialism? Was that a necessary phase in these sorts of revolutionary processes? Things like that are what Animal Farm is gesturing towards.

All of that aside though. I think it's needlessly limiting to lop yourself off into an ideological box and say "Only my pet socialist experiment is the Real one!"

As Socialists, Communists, Anarchists, etc. Whatever our ideological convictions, we all have the same ultimate goal, and are apart of the same broad tradition.

I have stark disagreements with my Anarchist friends, but they're still my comrades, and I still respect many things about their commitment to direct action, and will defend their political projects, current and historic, to the hilt. Our struggle is ultimately the same, and we have much to learn from one another.

[-] el_bhm@lemm.ee 9 points 3 days ago

And that is why tankies cream their panties for dictators with imperialist ideas. Got it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] GoodLuckToFriends@lemmy.today 21 points 4 days ago

I don’t think it’s a coincidence that Marxist-Leninists describe their disagreements in terms that turn criticism of them into gibberish. I think it’s exactly what Orwell was writing about based on his experiences.

Nail on the head. There's a particularly active lemming from the tankie instances that always, and purposefully, devolves everything into arguing about everyone else using words incorrectly.

[-] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee 40 points 4 days ago

This meme describes anarchists. Are you sure you know what the terms mean?

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 15 points 4 days ago

Many anarchists are also communists. So I’m not sure I follow.

[-] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee 10 points 4 days ago

OP is talking about tankies and ML and how he doesn't like them, but the meme he posted doesn't describe those.

alsoAnarchists are communists. No one thinks anarcho-capitalists are anarchist except themselves and those they've misinformed.

[-] Genius@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 days ago

I'm agender

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Takapapatapaka@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

The subset of communists that do not support a state-backed socialist transition and argue for direct implementations of communism are precisely (mostly) anarchists/libertarians, i think that's what they were saying, so this would be compatible with them being communists.

[-] System_below@lemmy.myserv.one 6 points 3 days ago

Not really. I mean yes Anarchists believe that the state inherently breeds authoritarianism and should not be seized but abolished. However, most Anarchists believe in horizontal systems of governance with no centralisation of power, which is different to communism.

Anarchists believe and they are correct, that Marxism, M-L ect are authoritarian and violent.

[-] Takapapatapaka@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Communist is a broad word, and i think we have not the same meaning in mind.

To the very core, communism is to think that private property should be abolished. Marx was the most influential thinker of this, and we nowadays call 'communist' all the thinkers and movments that inherit Marx (Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Trotsky, etc.). But anarchists also belong to the very root of communism, they just dont follow Marx (historically, they belonged to the First Internationale and were banned by marxists, with Bakunin as their main figure).

Horizontal system of governance can be communism in its broad sense if there is no private property. This explains some movments like 'libertarian communism', which are closer to anarchism than to marxism. But yes, if we equate communism and marxism, anarchists are no communists.

[-] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 10 points 4 days ago

It describes the tankie strawman of anarchists.

[-] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

Textbook communism is an ideal utopia that can never be achieved.

[-] Genius@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago
[-] Saryn@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Huh? You mean Catalonia in 1936-1937?

Fan of Chomsky I presume?

[-] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago

Yeah, but that's just an attempt at something like communism. They didn't reach full communism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago
[-] Genius@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 days ago

During the Spanish civil war, Catalonia was governed by the Marxists and the Anarchists. They dismantled the state and gave control of the government over to the trade unions. It wasn't perfect, but it was the middle of a war, and they were making progress every month. Until they were betrayed by the Marxist-Leninists.

[-] kittenzrulz123 9 points 3 days ago

They were Anarcho-Syndicalist and tbh we have never forgotten them. The collapse of the CNT was one of the greatest tragedies in human history.

[-] LoveSausage@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 days ago

So they failed to maintain control?

[-] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

Western leftism is plagued by a culture of purity. Only upholding failed projects, because they never actually had to contend with the messy realities of governance.

[-] LoveSausage@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 days ago
[-] Genius@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

Oh, I fully support non-western communist movements, such as the Haudenosaunee. Do you respect the Haudenosaunee as communists, or am I about to hear a racist rant?

[-] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

You could at least cite the Zapatistas, or something.

The Haudenosaunee might be considered 'primitive communism' though I think that's an unfair characterization, while I think Engles and Lewis Henry Morgan were ultimately correct in their broad assertions about origins of the family and class stratification, the particular focus on the Haudenosaunee was based on a lingering, erroneous, assumption that indigenous Americans were somehow more primitive, or existed in some 'state of nature'.

But it's even more of a stretch to assert that the modern Haudenosaunee, as a cultural and political entity are Communist in the modern political sense. There is no coherent Haudenosaunee sovereignty movement that also has strong anarchist or Marxist ideological convictions, akin to what we see with Neozapatismo.

But if you have a counter argument, I'd like to hear it.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

One of the only large-scale “communist” societies that worked, and it was promptly destroyed by authoritarians.

[-] Genius@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago

Stalin: It's going to be at least another hundred years before I can do communism

Catalonia: Yeah so it's been a few weeks and we're already doing communism. Come visit and shoot a Nazi!

Stalin: Fuck fuck fuck they're making me look bad. Uhhhhhhh destroy Catalonia!

[-] FundMECFSResearch 7 points 4 days ago

I think this meme is referenced to this quote Orwell wrote after fighting for and living the revolution in Spain.

Except for the small revolutionary groups which exist in all countries, the whole world was determined upon preventing revolution in Spain. In particular the Communist Party, with Soviet Russia behind it, had thrown its whole weight against the revolution. It was the Communist Party thesis that revolution at this stage would be fatal and that what was to be aimed at in Spain was not workers' control, but bourgeois democracy. It hardly needs pointing out why 'liberal' capitalist opinion took the same line.

[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

I need to read up on this. Spain in 1936 seems like one of those points in history that waaaaaay too much shit is quietly connected to. What little I know of it comes from For Whom The Bell Tolls

[-] LoveSausage@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 4 days ago
[-] Rozauhtuno 16 points 4 days ago

Read som marxism ABC.

"Normal people are too stupid to achieve communism on their own, so they need to be guided by a vanguard party of corrupt yes-men led by a psychopath."

[-] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago

That'd be vanguardism. But that's a component of Leninism, which is itself subset of Marxism.

A part of a part of Marxism probably shouldn't be a working definition of the whole.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
287 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

8048 readers
1289 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS