445
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 hours ago

built, not bought.

[-] CocaineShrimp@lemm.ee 69 points 1 day ago

Hold up. Let me get this straight - Synology is trying to make their NASs only work with their own proprietary hard drives? Do they not realize that there are boat loads of other companies out there making NASs and Hard Drives?

Who the hell is going to want to buy a Synology NAS now? Ffs, some of these companies are so delusional...

[-] primemagnus@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It’s one of those really myopic decisions that sink companies. But god bless em, they just keep trying lol

[-] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 day ago

Short term profits reign king once again

Gotta make the imaginary money line go up somehow

[-] tabular@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Is there a reason to think all the other companies couldn't start doing it to?

[-] Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee 2 points 8 hours ago

because tons and tons of potential solutions exist. At the core of this class of product is a very simple computer that costs next to nothing. FOSS software exists to accomplish the same goal and for minimal cost someone can compete with them.

Synology doesn't really control anything. In the enterprise segment they tend to be tiny little offerings that are on the small end of SMB. Their bigger bulkier enterprise stuff is easily overshadowed by any real enterprise offering from a larger hardware company, though i've seen some exist even in larger orgs but it's not because something else couldn't have done the job.

Anyone starting fresh has to do some work to catch up but it really depends on the use case. Basic NAS/DAS functions are so trivial.

[-] Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

This sucks as a long time Synology customer. They really should know their audience better.

Oh well. Back to proxmox to handle everything

[-] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

My switch to Unraid is feeling better every day 😀

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 94 points 1 day ago

Broadcom released a free VMware again, Synology is locking down their products,... Did Synology just hire some brain dead Broadcom executive?

This is seriously 'how to kill your brand and customer good will in one easy step' type nonsense.
Synology does not have the respect in Enterprise that someone like Dell or HPE does. They exist in Enterprise because of admins who use it at home and then bring the knowledge to work.

All this does is make sure nobody will buy one for the home anymore. There are too many other good options. And various open source NAS OS choices becoming more mature by the day.

If I was an OEM like Beelink or Servermicro I would be rushing to make an unbranded storage box, five or six 3.5 in SATA hot swap bays in front, 2-4 NVMe ports on the bottom, decent low power CPU, and an SODIMM socket or two. They'd sell a ton of them.

I also wouldn't be surprised if a Synology 'jailbreak' to load a third party OS comes out.

[-] undu@discuss.tchncs.de 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Did Synology just hire some brain dead Broadcom executive?

Well, Citrix's CEO was Broadcom' software boss

And also hasa place at the US treasury, he's DOGE-affiliated as well: https://www.crn.com/news/cloud/2025/citrix-parent-ceo-krause-on-doge-role-we-re-applying-public-company-standards-to-the-federal-government

[-] oppy1984@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago

My employer uses Citrix to run our proprietary apps. Every "upgrade" they issued just made it worse to the point that it was crashing multiple times and day. Since we're a 25/7 operation we had to have IT on standby all the time to reboot the servers every time they crashed. Citrix support said there was nothing in the logs other than the crashes so it must be our brand new hardware.

It got so bad that corporate paid the IT team extra to build a web based version as a backup. It's slower than Citrix but at least when Citrix crashes we have a fallback that works.

Thankfully corporate has given the green light for a custom built system, so now we're all just waiting for the corporate machine to go through the bidding process so we can start working with whoever they pick.

[-] debil@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Well,

Broadcom released a free VMware again

should be taken as a bait to lure in unsuspecting users before later stage enshit tactics happen. Synology seems to be at some other point in their enshit process, but enshit nevertheless.

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

Oh absolutely. Without a doubt. Broadcom / VMware have lost trust for good

[-] Tja@programming.dev 10 points 1 day ago

QNAP, Asustor, UGreen, Unifi, and many others already offer lower cost NASes from 2 to 8 bays (some might offer even more)

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago

Oh tons of alternatives for sure. Where I'm at, at this point if I go somewhere else I'm going to want open source most likely.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 9 points 1 day ago

If I was an OEM like Beelink or Servermicro I would be rushing to make an unbranded storage box, five or six 3.5 in SATA hot swap bays in front, 2-4 NVMe ports on the bottom, decent low power CPU, and an SODIMM socket or two. They'd sell a ton of them.

There's no shortage of alternatives to Synology hardware. People buy Synology because of the software.

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

Tons of alternatives from other NAS vendors, but I'm not sure anyone makes a Synology type box that is a generic x86 to run your own OS. Plenty of tower server type things but I'm not aware of any little toaster type boxes.

[-] HiTekRedNek@lemm.ee 1 points 7 hours ago

You can buy a NAS case, get a cheap matx or itx motherboard and roll your own with ease. Where exactly have you looked?

Here's one such case: https://a.co/d/eUz87Mh

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago

Lots of companies do. Or at the very least they make them to where you can install whatever you want yourself.

[-] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Hey, that's not entirely true! Our place brought them in because it was also a cheap solution! Honestly, it has done fine for our storage solution, which is mostly backups related. Then again, we came from Baracuda, which was super expensive, super locked down, and did break a lot.

[-] HailSeitan@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

This sounds like the company from Cory Doctorow’s most recent novel, Picks & Shovels

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 63 points 1 day ago

Even if the drive prices are not raised to unreasonable levels, if ever Synology decides to stop selling these drives the NAS you have purchased will become useless. Think I'll pass.

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago

It doesn't become useless, it just misses out on a bunch of useful features for the drives.

Still ridiculous, of course

[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Well shit… I don’t even think about that.

[-] trustnoone@lemmy.sdf.org 40 points 1 day ago

This is the silliest thing I've ever heard, do they even know their audience.

[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago
[-] remon@ani.social 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yup, been using that from the start, since none of the 20TB drives were "verified" when I bought them.

It's a bit annoying that you have to do that, but ultimately a non-issue.

[-] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago

I switched from a HP MicroServer with TrueNAS (the BSD one) to a Synology 8-bay system because of convenience, mostly (DIY 8-bay with hot swap, low idle power and all seems hard to come by).

Hopefully it'll last for years to come but if I ever need to replace/upgrade it it's not gonna be another Synology with this type of extreme vendor lock-in.

[-] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 16 points 1 day ago

That is sad to see. I’ve moved on to Raspberry Pi + hard disk enclosure (with incredible performance) but it’s still upsetting to see Synology go this route.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago

One point: if it matters to you, you might want to confirm your enclosure's behavior under power-loss conditions. I had one that did not come back to a powered on state or have an option to do so when power was restored. Not something I'd thought of, since I'd assumed this behavior. Eventually, after some looking, found an enclosure with a mechanical-toggle power switch that did restore prior state.

[-] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 6 points 1 day ago

It does matter to me and I live in an area with frequent power outages. Unfortunately I didn’t check this out before purchasing so I’m pretty annoyed by this behavior.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah, sucks. :-/

For anyone else in the same boat, let me go see what that enclosure is with a physical power button that I wound up ultimately getting.

goes to look

This:

https://www.amazon.com/Swapable-External-Enclosure-Support-Capacity/dp/B0DCDDGHMJ

Probably others one can find


just an 8-bay JBOD enclosure with a variable speed fan and physical power switch.

But unlike the non-powering-on-after-power-loss enclosures, I haven't had problems with it.

I have a ton of USB devices, and drive enclosures


the one thing that I really do not want to stay offline


are the only thing I've ever seen that doesn't power up again on power loss. Maybe there are some USB displays that might also do so, but I don't care about that if I'm not physically present.

[-] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 1 points 1 day ago

For that price I might as well get a used desktop or another mini PC.

[-] drmoose@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Consumer NAS devices is a lost plot point either way.

Buy a 2nd hand thinkpad or a gaming PC for basically the same price as synology tray and you'll have not only a NAS but a full home server that'll last you a decade and play video games as an extra.

[-] MangoPenguin 11 points 1 day ago

That's fine for us techy people, but my parents would not be able to do that.

[-] drmoose@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Not sure if proprietary NAS tools are any easier tbh

I think the IT consumer culture is just lazy. If you don't know how to fix your sink you'd call in a plumber but if your home server breaks ppl just sit and whine how tech is too hard rather than you know paying someone to do the job for them.

[-] MangoPenguin 2 points 16 hours ago

They are significantly easier to use.

[-] drmoose@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

According to whom? Distros like omv are incredibly easy and once setup basically 100% hands off and will last you for years without any proprietary shit that might break at any point after 1 year warranty expires.

[-] MangoPenguin 2 points 13 hours ago

People like my parents. I feel like I'm explaining in circles here lol.

OMV is not easy for the average person, you have to know how to boot and install an OS, how to access something on your network via IP, how to assign a static IP, what raid type to use (or not use), how to install and configure something like Nextcloud to access and sync files, where to store files on the filesystem, how to install and configure backups to remote storage.. I could go on.

Something as common as having a Google drive type interface on a NAS is very complex with OMV and other open source options.

[-] desktop_user 0 points 22 hours ago

if you don't know how to fix a sink: learn how and put a bucket under it in the meantime.

paying people to fix your problems develops helplessness and an over-reliance on societal function.

[-] drmoose@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

So we should just throw away the entire concept of specialization and do every single thing ourselves? Pretty dumb take my dude.

[-] desktop_user 0 points 10 hours ago

specialization of labor is still a good thing, it's just that having enough knowledge to fix basic around the house problems (like a sink) is helpful and, at least where I've lived, it takes less time to learn how to fix a sink than to find a plumber. For larger or more complicated problems, like a toilet or shower, professionals are almost always the better choice.

[-] ToadOfHypnosis@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago

I bought a Terramaster instead. Better hardware specs for the money and you can overwrite the OS with Linux which is way better than any stock OS.

[-] mbirth@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

This is what I’ll replace my DS415+ with, too, once it dies. The TerraMasters are basically bog-standard Intel NUCs with a storage adapter. And there’s HDMI output and an internal USB drive which you can just replace (or overwrite) and install OMV or TrueNAS or whatever.

[-] abrahambelch@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago

Their website looks pretty sketchy, ngl

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

Sketch? Nah bro, that is exactly the kind of "This looked sick in the early 2000s and we haven't bothered updating it since" level of design that I want to see from a hardware vendor. That's a company that's just sitting there quietly trucking along, making nerdy devices for nerdy people. That's a website that was never intended to be viewed by anyone other than a 30+ year old sysadmin who owns at least one beard grooming product.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

That's a website that was never intended to be viewed by anyone other than a 30+ year old sysadmin who owns at least one beard grooming product.

Somewhere, a !unixsocks@lemmy.blahaj.zone denizen looks offended.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Sorry, you're absolutely correct, I should have added "... or a pair of thigh highs."

Shameful oversight on my part.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] whaleross@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I have an Asustor that is running Debian. It's just a PC in a NAS enclosure so why should it not.

[-] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's all a NAS has ever been, just a PC that specializes in storage. "NAS" isn't a specific product, either - it's whatever hardware you set up to function as such. My own NAS is a 2014 Mac mini running OMV (Debian 12 based) with a 4-bay locking drive dock attached to it. Works great.

I took images of my gaming PC drives (500GB, 2TB) onto a 4TB spinner, then shoved that spinner into my NAS's dock. With 2 minutes of point and click configuration, I can access those images from my gaming PC's new Linux install over the network to copy whatever data I might need. Easy peasy. No Synology needed for that.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
445 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

69211 readers
3192 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS