126

Headlines marking the passing of Samuel Wurzelbacher, also known as ‘Joe the Plumber,’ are a window into the past, when for a brief moment during the 2008 presidential campaign he became a well-known face in debates over economic policy that Nicole Hemmer argues have been feeding a right-wing myth for decades.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

Guy wasn’t even a plumber

[-] matchphoenix@feddit.uk 28 points 1 year ago

Guy wasn’t even named Joe

[-] J12@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Guy wasn’t even a guy

[-] son_named_bort@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Guy wasn't even a the

[-] spider@lemmy.nz 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He was the George Santos of plumbers.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

They had no choice but to sell a myth: they have no truth to sell.

[-] Gingerlegs@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

I remember like 3 days later it was in the news that it was all fake. Yet, here we are!

[-] Kbin_space_program@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago

Fun Fact: the elite used the exact same strategy to drum up support for:

The US Revolution. One of the Adams brothers owned a newspaper and would pen letters pretending to be uneducated laymen and forced the editors to publish them under fake names.

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Isn't this essentially what the Federalist Papers of Hamilton fame were too?

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago
[-] venusenvy47@lemdro.id 2 points 1 year ago

Did he pick a side? I don't remember him being used by either party.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

He was undecided.

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/kFUNJ2TA9II?si=17gePVWUjyF8BYbi

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The headlines marking his passing — an untimely and unfortunate death from cancer at 49 — are also a window into the past, a moment to look back at Wurzelbacher’s particular role in history, when he became the face of debates over economic policy unfolding at a pivotal crossroads in America.

With the economy in freefall, Obama had made his way to a working-class Ohio neighborhood to explain how his programs, from tax policy to health care reform, would aid working- and middle-class Americans.

The McCain campaign saw their exchange as a golden opportunity: Here was someone who appeared to be working-class guy, Joe the Plumber, who believed that the Republican plan to cut taxes and government services was exactly what blue-collar Americans needed.

In the late 1960s and 1970s, President Richard Nixon’s administration saw an opportunity to wrest White working-class voters from the Democratic Party, a belief bolstered after the hard-hat riot in 1970, where construction workers clashed with antiwar protesters in New York City.

After the Supreme Court gutted the part of the Affordable Care Act that would have required states to expand Medicaid, millions of Americans found themselves facing skyrocketing health insurance rates that the even government supplements couldn’t ease.

Class in America is material but it is also a claim to a set of values and a way of life, as well as an argument about who is an authentic member of “real America.” It is an identity deeply inflected by race and gender, and sometimes has little to do with dollar amounts.


The original article contains 1,648 words, the summary contains 257 words. Saved 84%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] walter_wiggles@lemmy.nz 10 points 1 year ago

I know you meant well Mr Bot, but your summary is pretty bad this time.

this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
126 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19072 readers
4078 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS