594
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Former Proud Boys national leader Enrique Tarrio is set to be sentenced on Wednesday for a failed plot to keep Donald Trump in power after the Republican lost the 2020 presidential election, capping one of the most significant prosecutions in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Prosecutors are seeking 33 years behind bars for Tarrio, who had already been arrested and ordered to leave Washington, D.C., by the time Proud Boys members joined thousands of Trump supporters in storming the Capitol as lawmakers met to certify Democrat Joe Biden’s 2020 electoral victory. But prosecutors say Tarrio organized and led the group’s assault from afar, inspiring followers with his charisma and penchant for propaganda.

Tarrio was a top target in one of the most important Capitol riot cases prosecuted by the Justice Department. He and three lieutenants were convicted in May of charges including seditious conspiracy — a rarely brought Civil War-era offense that the Justice Department levied against members of far-right groups who played a key role in the Jan. 6 attack.

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 80 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As much as I know the prison system is broken and terrible, this guy deserves what he is getting.

He led an attempt to overthrow the fucking government. Anybody who tries to obfuscate that fact or justify what happened is playing a dangerous game. It was lucky that the violence didn't escalate to an even more serious degree, and turn this nation on its head more than it already has. What they attempted to do has irrevocably damaged American society, and the strength of our democracy.

Therefore, I hope he serves all 33 years.

[-] keeb420@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

I'm all for reforming the prison system. However I think it's funny these people are crying about it now that they are subject to it after not caring about others in the prison system.

[-] harpuajim@lemmy.ml 47 points 1 year ago

Commit domestic terrorist acts get domestic terrorist sentences.

.>Commit domestic terrorist acts get domestic terrorist sentences.

I mean, they said it....

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Na na na na

Na na na na

Hey, hey! Goodbye!

[-] demlet@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I thought it was only seven "na"s.

[-] KnightontheSun@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

No, he has the nas right, it's the heys he's short on.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Is the second 'hey' not a long 'hey?' That's how it always sounded to me.

[-] KnightontheSun@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=JnEPTG6K4pY

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IoyvvEWHodk

Looks like it has morphed a bit over the years, so both versions do exist. But you’re right about the original number of ‘hey’s. I concede the number of heys as two to you.

Very important these things.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Thank you for confirming this vital information which is definitely an important piece of the Enrique Tarrio story.

[-] KnightontheSun@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Sorry, who?

[-] AssPennies@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Finally once the mandala effect does not apply.

[-] Gingerlegs@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago
[-] ProffessionalAmateur@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Apologies in advance for stupid questions as I'm not American but.. just been reading up on Proud Boys and that guy is not how shall I say.. white?

So

  1. How is he a leader of such an extreme right wing group?
  2. How does he have followers? Ideologically shouldn't they hate him?
  3. FUCK HIM glad the hateful bastard is gonna rot, reap what you sow
[-] Badass_panda@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Some people think if you hate the same people hard enough, you're on the same side -- and the Proud Boys were happy to have someone brown as their front guy for a while there. "See? It's about values!"

The reality is that plenty of them hate his guts for not being white, I remember these guys split into two factions a while back based ok whether they would accept brown people who hated other brown people hard enough or not.

[-] oatscoop@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago

Extremists will happily accept the help of people they dislike when they're weak, particularly if it lends them legitimacy.

When they gain power the purges start.

[-] Serdan@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

https://www.rawstory.com/amp/civil-war-brewing-inside-proud-boys-as-top-leader-says-hes-done-pretending-isnt-a-nazi-2649553246

There was a bit of a kerfuffle over that. I don't follow it closely enough to know how that turned out.

[-] rog@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

Racists are generally sheltered, easily lead, uneducated, and guillible.

True racism isnt generally caused by people they know, its by being told that "they" are taking your jobs, stealing your welfare, clogging your hospitals, driving your living costs up, etc, etc.

Its a tool used by the powerful to divert attention. The easily lead take it at face value and hate "them". If they meet a "reformed" person of colour, they see them as "one of the good ones".

While these racists can be outwardly horrible to individuals, they typically dont "hate" the person. They hate "them". The group that doesnt really exist, that they are told are making their own life worse.

A great example is in the Louis Theroux documentary, Louis and the Nazis. He spends time with various white supremacists, and while hanging out with one of the community leaders he meets his TV repair man, a Mexican man that has been servicing his televisions for years who the white supremacist leader considers a friend. One of the leaders side kicks is also fucking a Mexican woman.

The Mexicans that they know are "the good ones". Its the rest of "them" that are the problem in their eyes.

Its an unfortunately common occurence in people that they can be presented with direct evidence contrary to their beliefs, but they are so far gone down their rabbit hole that they consider the evidence as either an outlier or anomoly and not somethign worth analysing in terms of their perception.

[-] Hyperi0n@lemmy.film 1 points 1 year ago

He was one of the voices for Latinos For Trump. The Proud Boys are not against black or Latino people.

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

May he rot.

[-] mephiska@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Just read the hearings are rescheduled for Tuesday, Sept 5th. Judge is out sick.

[-] Sacha@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

33 years? Doesn't possessing pot net you 25? 33 years for seditious treason doesn't seem like a serious enough sentence.

United States Justice system is a joke.

[-] quindraco@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, it doesn't. Where are you getting your info?

Possessing Pot by offense count, min-max sentence, min-max fine

  1. 0 days - 1 year, $0-1000
  2. 15 days - 2 years, $0-2500
  3. 90 days - 3 years, $0-5000

(3 is actually 3+ but that does weird things to the list format.)

Separately, Seditious Conspiracy has a max jail time of 20 years (I couldn't find any cap on its fine), so this means Tarrio is being sentenced for both it and at least 1 other charge (which could be a second count of the same for all I know).

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Except pot is likely being charged at the state level and not federal. That'll be different for every state and some could have egregious punishments. Not that that says you're wrong or the other guy is right. Just some context.

[-] RegularGoose@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

I guess we'll just pretend there aren't hordes of people in the US serving decades for weed, then.

[-] quindraco@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Among several reasons your statement is disingenuous is the incredibly significant point that many weed crimes are not possession. I replied to someone discussing possession with more discussion of possession. Many people are serving time for "weed" without serving time for possession, which you absolutely knew when you posted your comment.

[-] RegularGoose@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fuck off with this bullshit. Aside from drugging someone without their consent, there are no "weed crimes" that justify imprisonment, let alone more time than many people get for actually kilking someone.

The only other things you can do with weed are buying it, selling it, posessing it, and using it. Despite being illegal, none of those are actual crimes.

[-] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Pretty sure that was sarcasm/hyperbole.

Edit: Apparently people are touchy today... Yeesh

[-] Neato@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

United States Justice system is a joke.

Agreed. Prison in the US is tortuous and that is the point. It ruins your prospects when you get out, too. Ensuring crime is more likely. Prison in the US is absolutely pointless in the vast majority of cases to actually decrease crime.

America also has disproportionately long prison sentences for all types of crimes. 33 years ensures this person will be ~72yo when he gets out. So he will immediately be on medicare and likely retired, if possible. At that point, the only reason to not just execute a person is because you could later overturn the conviction.

We keep people in prison so long we're effectively denying them any more life while also spending huge gobs of money to do so AND also denying them any productivity to benefit society. It really is just about the American bloodthirst for revenge.

[-] corvaxL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

The sentencing won't be happening today after all. The judge fell ill today, so it'll be delayed until some time next week.

[-] charonn0@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago

33 years would be satisfactory.

this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
594 points (100.0% liked)

News

23296 readers
2792 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS