243
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SaltSong@startrek.website 83 points 3 days ago

So the people upset about the wrongdoing can be punished, but the people who wrongdid are not able to be punished?

Fascinating.

[-] teamevil@lemmy.world 64 points 3 days ago
[-] Cocopanda@futurology.today 5 points 3 days ago

What’s that? I can’t hear anything besides this guillotine whooshing down with its blade. Bonjour!

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 76 points 3 days ago

The headline is missing the point and downplaying what's going on here, this lawyer wasn't expressing frustration, he didn't raise his voice or make insulting remarks or anything like that. He was asked by the judge [paraphrased] "Why is your client breaking the law?" and replied [paraphrased] "I asked them that too. I guess they didn't mean to do it?" but the Trump administration wanted him to either straight up lie and say they hadn't broken the law or refuse to answer the judge's questions and pretend the court didn't have authority to ask them.

Not only is our executive branch breaking the law and ignoring court orders to follow the law, they're throwing out any attorneys who won't also break the law and ignore judges too.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 43 points 3 days ago

Just more evidence that the "weaponized DOJ" was projection.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

It always is.

[-] SnotFlickerman 36 points 3 days ago

No dissent will be tolerated.

So much for free speech.

[-] nulluser@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

You can have all of the free speech you want, as long as it's the right speech.

[-] roguetrick@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago

You'll be hard pressed to find lawyers who are both competent and willing to directly lie to a judge.

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

Why would this administration need competent lawyers, they're playing the game with cheat codes and can't lose

[-] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 days ago

Maybe if more people hold up signs and occupy a sidewalk outside buildings that these oligarchs never go to will fix this! Lets organize ANYWHERE BUT their mansions, lets not inconvenience them too much and inconvenience eachother even more. That'll show em! I can't wait for the next time millions of people gather together to be ignored, just so long as we don't organize and gather at places we can't be ignored, that'll make them fear us!

Hard /s because people still seem to believe that peacefully holding signs and capitulating to the villains will fix anything.

[-] Hegar@fedia.io 24 points 3 days ago

There are stages to escalate through and multiple channels to apply pressure through at the same time.

Large-scale peaceful demonstrations are an important first stage, and are still required as more intense channels are opened up.

It's a matter of "Yes, that and more" not "No, something else"

[-] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 days ago

Touche. Perhaps I figure that we'd already be at that stage by now, considering how broad the consensus is about who the villains are. Considering the crime that Luigi is unjustly taking the fall for, and how uniting across the board that was, I figured that was less a seed being planted and more a full grown tree bearing fruit.

[-] nulluser@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Nobody here is stopping you from organizing/doing your own whatever. There are sites like mobilize.us where you can organize a protest at whatever oligarch's mansion you want. Stop whining and waiting for someone else to do what you think needs to be done. Be the change you want to see.

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Let's discuss plans to commit civil disobedience in public forums, that's a great idea! /s

this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
243 points (100.0% liked)

News

28500 readers
4211 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS