150

In a post on X, Newsom addressed the U.S.'s global trading partners, writing "California is here and ready to talk."

It comes after a Fox News report revealed that Newsom is directing his state to pursue "strategic" relationships with countries announcing retaliatory tariffs against the U.S., urging them to exclude California-made products from those taxes.

all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 1SimpleTailor@startrek.website 46 points 1 week ago

A chilling look into what could be the first real steps towards the Balkanization of the United States. It's sad that it's gotten to this point, but realistically I don't see another path forward. It may be unconstitutional, but unfortunatly that founding document has lost its legitimately as the current administration wipes it's ass with it on a daily basis.

[-] coyootje@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

I think the fact that you have such a polarized society where states are "red" or "blue" and have such different policies and views on things make it difficult to function as 1 country. Of course this has always been the case to a certain extent but nowadays it feels a lot more rabid then before. Knowing how much democrats like being pushovers nothing will probably happen (for the good of the country or some bullshit) but I do hope that more and more of these protest style things keep happening and that Trumps authority keeps withering away.

[-] zephorah@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

Let Texas and Florida play nanny to the red states? Until Florida is underwater anyway.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

That'll be a fun decade

[-] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 week ago

America's over. Time to split and let the trump States suffer. It's all we can do

[-] tonytins@pawb.social 4 points 1 week ago

It's been pretty fragmented since the whole "states rights" movement.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Can they even do this? What leverage does CA have here? Presumably any goods imported into the state would be subject to US tariffs because those are imposed at the Federal level, so it's not like Newsom can offer to exempt other countries imports from tariffs if they're bound for California.

Well, OK, in one sense he could, but he'd literally have to direct officials in California to defy US federal law, and possibly get into direct conflict with Federal agents operating in the state, right?

Assuming he's not going to do that, how does this play work? What does he offer in return for other countries exempting CA from their counter tariffs?

Also, how is this not a stepping stone towards an independent California? (I strongly suspect the answer to that last question is "it is, end of answer")

Refusing to levy the federal tariff and daring Trump to do something about it as the only way this could work I could think of too. That could go pear shaped very fast

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Like the law fucking matters now in the era of Trump.

[-] resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

Why does it matter? Trump ignores the constitution regularly.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah the customs at California ports is run by the federal agency

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 week ago

If WA OR CA governors wanted to start forming a bloc to negotiate deals internationally that would be interesting.

[-] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 1 week ago

The California Republic should just secede already.

[-] OverWatchDelta@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I agree since the Colorado is being bled dry

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 4 points 1 week ago

Well they voted to do a study to determine if they should. I think its good for them to do it over the period of years, not months.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

How would this even work?

Products coming into California would be subject to Trump's tariffs. California has no control over that. Is California expecting other countries to simply ignore that and give California a pass because they're besties or something? That would be a completely lopsided and unfair trade deal for those countries. And the more states that sign on to this "California deal" where incoming goods are still subject to Trump tariffs but products coming from those states are somehow exempt from the retaliatory tariffs would only serve to make the deal even more lopsided against those countries.

If I were the leader of any of these countries, I'd be telling Newsom to go pound sand and to put the pressure on their own elected leader to bring an end to this bullshit, and until then, the retaliatory tariffs stay.

[-] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago

Kick out the feds from the port

[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

State taxes/subsidies.

[-] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Honestly I hope Newsom takes this fight and loses, even though I applaud the effort. It's an unconstitutional overreach for a state to step into international trade and relations. But having the fight over it will both remind the rabid right why we have a federal government, and what they could lose if they keep going down this path.

[-] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago

Cali independence confirmed

this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
150 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22929 readers
3029 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS