566
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by zaxvenz@lemm.ee to c/europe@feddit.org

Germany’s centre-Right Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party and the centre-Left Social Democrats (SPD), which are holding coalition talks, have proposed a law that will block people with multiple extremism convictions from standing in elections.

https://archive.ph/yNQwE

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] oftheair 32 points 6 days ago

Wake us up when it's "have".

[-] sexy_peach@feddit.org 5 points 5 days ago

They're not gonna

[-] eveninghere@beehaw.org 1 points 5 days ago

A similar system has been there to prevent Nazism rise. Sadly, AfD and other right wing parties found a loophole a decade ago.

[-] federalreverse@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago

If you're talking about the option of banning the entire party: The "loophole" that Afd is exploiting is that this action needs political support and gonservatives are unwilling to give political support for banning a(nother) right-wing party. Is that really a loophole?

[-] oftheair 1 points 5 days ago

Yeah, sadly there is only one way to defeat Nazis and it's not easy or liked by most.

[-] Disaster@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 days ago

Then they'll ban far left politicians from running.

Then they'll ban anyone they don't like.

And eventually, they'll ban everyone who isn't them.

Right wing lunatics are repulsive in almost every sense, but this isn't the way you beat them. When you put the machinery in place to do something like this, it will inevitably be abused in the opposite direction in future.

[-] misteloct@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

It's much harder to be abused when you ban the only party abusing it.

[-] morgunkorn@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 days ago
[-] Goldholz 18 points 6 days ago

Yes we could, but the inner security is stalling the investigation and the conservatives and liberals think they could get the nazi votes and lean heavily into the rethorik. Yeaaah doesnt work out. Never did

[-] segabased@lemmy.zip 18 points 6 days ago

This absolutely needs to be a thing in every country. Ban far right parties, ban far right media

[-] pitiable_sandwich540@feddit.org 5 points 6 days ago

Considering the CDU could be considered a far right party themselves, they just wanna eliminate their competition, so i wouldn't get my hopes up.

They literaly had an election poster with the slogan "You don't have to vote for the AfD to get what you want. There is a democratic alternative: the CDU!".

As long as privately owned press and corporate social media algorithms try to shift the overton window as far right as it can go that's not gonna happen.

[-] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

They know too well what happens when you let these fuckers get power.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 6 days ago

Does this have more backing than the motion to ban the AfD entirely did?

[-] Spaniard@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

The CDU thinks they will get their votes but they won't.

[-] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 112 points 1 week ago

This will 100% be used to suppress left politicians.

Just ban the fucking AfD already.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 109 points 1 week ago

Maybe also consider bribery convictions and we might get rid of a few CDU/CSU politicians as well 🙃

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] Metz@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I love how the commenters on that page hating all on the "far-left", despite the left has exactly nothing to do with that idea. dumb fucks as far one can see.

[-] azimir@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 week ago

It's classic whataboutism and trying to draw false equivalencies to muddy the waters. They want to put everyone else on defense about the decision to ban Nazis by making you waste time explaining why someone else isn't a Nazi.

To sum up: fuck them. Nazis are bad. Please continue punching them, both metaphorically, legally, and physically as needed to keep them in their hidey holes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zer0_F0x@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago

Greece did something similar a few years ago.

The Golden Dawn far right wing party was declared a criminal organization (after some violence that lead to a few stabbings and at least one death) and their leaders were thrown in jail.

From the ashes of Golden Dawn and a few other populist/Christian conservative/nationalist parties rose a few new ones, with more careful rhetoric and open support from the now jailed golden dawn leaders and high ranking church ministers.

They are collectively holding 26 of the 300 seats in the parliament and are expected to get better results on the next election cycle.

You can ban them all you want, they can still reform into a "we are not far right, wink wink" party after the ban itself verifies their far right status and rise to power all the same.

[-] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 36 points 1 week ago

A party ban in germany results also in a pohibition to form follow up parties. That's why we should aim for the party and not single members

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Do it. Honestly I'm a little surprised you didn't do it 80 years ago

[-] kungfuratte@feddit.org 12 points 6 days ago

In a way we did. Anticonstitutional parties are generally not allowed. The problem is that courts and judges must be absolutely convinced that a party is anticonstitutional to actually ban them.

While I understand the point, won't this just make politicians run on lies even more?

[-] Vegetvs@feddit.org 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

A far-right uprising in Germany, which is at the moment re-militarizing itself. Doesn't anybody else worry about that?

[-] kungfuratte@feddit.org 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

That's a point we are really worried about here in Germany too. The armament of the nation feels wrong in itself too many of us (even though most of us don't have any better ideas when looking at Putin-Russia). But the outlook that the AfD (our stupid Nazi party) could inherit the upgraded army and it's arsenal one day is really frightening.

[-] Pippipartner@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 1 week ago

That's astonishing bullshit. There is already a process for ban political parties with political alignments incompatible with the constitution, which has to be initialized by o e of the two chambers of parliament and decided by the constitutional court. Having a political instrument in addition to that will automatically reduce the hurdle of dismantling political movements, for blurry definitions of "sufficient amount of extremists in a party".

[-] Soleos@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

The proposal doesn't ban the party, it suggests banning extremist individuals convicted of things like inciting hatred from running for office. In effect, it puts a damper on extreme individual members of a party that doesn't itself reach the threshold for prohibition as a party. So I can see the logic behind it. But I agree it's a dicey proposal and ripe for political abuse. Still, it would be contingent on court decisions so it could work with a strong (just/uncorrupt) court system.

[-] Pippipartner@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 days ago

Well reading what's actually is there and not what I already concluded to be there has never been my strong suit. The proposal feels like sidestepping the actual problem, that the rise of the far right must be countered, by putting a weak barr on political discussion and political discours to mitigate broader problems. Which to be fair is the politics of center parties.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
566 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

5343 readers
2072 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS