374
submitted 11 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

U.S. officials have warned European allies against excluding American defense firms from EU weapons tenders, amid new EU proposals to boost domestic arms production.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio emphasized U.S. concerns in recent meetings, citing potential negative repercussions if U.S. companies are sidelined.

The EU's €150 billion ReArm Europe plan aims to reduce reliance on foreign suppliers as Trump signals reduced U.S. NATO engagement.

Washington sees the move as conflicting with its goal of selling arms abroad. Tensions highlight diverging transatlantic defense priorities under Trump's leadership.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 174 points 11 months ago

LOL.

Until U.S. foreign policy is no longer dictated by the Kremlin, the U.S. can get fucked.

[-] andrewta@lemmy.world 99 points 11 months ago

As an American citizen. I support this message.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 34 points 11 months ago

it's so weird being like "hey foreign invaders. i'll help y'all out. i'm down for bing a canadian province. or maybe the netherlands, france, or spain can reclaim their claims? i'm also down to arm native americans. i'm very flexible. i'm just not okay with this"

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 32 points 11 months ago

That's what happens when your country falls to Nazism. Anything else would be better.

[-] WarlockLawyer@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

Land Back has always been a valid option

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 14 points 11 months ago

and i'm in serious support of it to be clear

[-] reev@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago

Why would it change after that? They've clearly demonstrated they intend to just stab their allies in the back the second a bit of cash gets wiggled in front of their snouts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 116 points 11 months ago

Uh, what the fuck did these geniuses think would happen? Repeatedly kick every one of our allies in the balls, and....then what? Things continue just status quo in every other aspect?

[-] TronBronson@lemmy.world 72 points 11 months ago

Probably one of the top 10 Trump moments so far from the Oval Office “ we are going to make less capable aircraft for our allies. In case they aren’t our allies anymore in the future you never know.”

[-] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 25 points 11 months ago

He literally turns everything that he touches into shit. He is like the shit version of king Midas.

[-] madkins@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

Somebody said Mierdas

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago

right from putins mouth, it has alot buzzwords used by putin.

[-] Joeffect@lemmy.world 26 points 11 months ago

A bully never expects to be bullied right back

[-] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 24 points 11 months ago

Foreign countries do not just roll over to Donald Trump like American institutions do it seems

[-] Trihilis@ani.social 16 points 11 months ago

To be fair. That's what's basically been happening over the past 50 years. Just look at how we let Russia walk all over us. So it kinda makes sense for them to expect the same outcome.

Their only problem is that since Europe is basically on its own now, Europe has to choose for european produce. We can deal with one shitty dictatorship trying to push us around. But now its two shitty dictatorships so yeah that kinda changes things around (finally).

[-] Necroscope0@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago

That is exactly what these numb nut dipshits expected.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] einlander@lemmy.world 66 points 11 months ago

If America can go America first, then so should the EU.

[-] Mbourgon@lemmy.world 51 points 11 months ago

Put “DEI” requirements in the billing requirements

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] radiohead37@lemmy.world 51 points 11 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 50 points 11 months ago

"We don't need other countries!"

"Hey, you other countries can't do that, we need you!"

[-] Amberskin@europe.pub 44 points 11 months ago

Dear Mr. Rubio

Please gently fornicate yourself.

I don’t want a singe euro-cent of my taxes spent in the American industry.

You reap what you sow.

[-] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 41 points 11 months ago

Huh, it's almost like EU powers have seen the problem with having an unpredictable outsider control thier means of defense.

Imagine trying to preflight your fancy F35 and seeing the Tesla, "please wait for update" screen.

[-] Comtief@lemm.ee 35 points 11 months ago

Did they not just ask Europeans to up our defense spending? Getting a lot of mixed messages here.. Fools.

[-] Revan343@lemmy.ca 24 points 11 months ago

They meant they wanted Europe to buy a bunch of overpriced American fighter jets

[-] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 33 points 11 months ago

Get fucked military industrial complex. Reap what you sow.

[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 32 points 11 months ago

Another "illegal boycott" to them, I'm sure.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Hey USA you know how the saying goes: "Be careful what you ask for, you might get it."

Now Europe is arming itself like you asked. So kindly fuck off and be happy, that you got what you asked for.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 27 points 11 months ago

boo. fuckin. hoo.

you did it to yourselves. now. could you please stop deporting my neighbors? between the Ukrainians who got deported from my town and the rich white conservatives, i woulda rather deported the rich white conservatives

[-] TronBronson@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Deport maga to Russia where they already have the government they want!

[-] courageousstep@lemm.ee 27 points 11 months ago

Sounds to me like the US government has been thoroughly infiltrated by corporations only interested in their own profit. How dare other countries not pay billions to American corporations??

But we knew this already.

[-] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 11 months ago

The amount of mixed signals coming from this administration is insane.

Like you want to tariff us but if we fight back you say nah fam not like that.

America should be shunned out of society and can make deals with Russia and North Korea.

It’s about time people saw America for the bullies they are and sever ties with them.

Cunts.

[-] lowleekun@ani.social 8 points 11 months ago

It is logical if you accept that america has a fascist government. That is how fascism works, put pressure on other countries, bully them and if they do not comply you can point to them for politcal gain. After a while of "warning" and pretending that the other countries are enemies (all so your population gets riled up) you can start wars.

[-] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 5 points 11 months ago

The amount of mixed signals coming from this administration is insane.

No, seems pretty straightforward. It's simply "we'll tariff-whip you into submission and make you buy our shit"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] match@pawb.social 26 points 11 months ago

"isn't there someone you forgot to ask" vibes

[-] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago

Whiny man babies. “I’m gonna punch you in the gut just cause I’m a dick. Why aren’t you still buying my weapons???”

[-] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

There are no patent limitations on manufacturing M16s. It's a solid, proven, affordable design. Europe is a manufacturing powerhouse, with plenty of superb weapons manufacturers who don't even need to use Stoner's design. They risk absolutely nothing.

[-] HK65@sopuli.xyz 14 points 11 months ago

Why would Europe manufacture M16s? HK416s are superior, in that most NATO armies, including the US has adopted it.

[-] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Because it's free. H&K is expensive. I imagine they still hold parents on the HK416 and might prevent other manufacturers from making them. No such restrictions exist for the M16 or AR-15 anymore. While the HK416 may well be superior, there's nothing wrong with the AR that hasn't been addressed for years. And it might send a bit of a message if Europe starts building a bunch of them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

Nah, as an American, fuck the US government and US arms dealers. They don't get to fuck over our allies and demand profit out of them in the war machine they keep moving. Especially with them joining the axis of evil and aiding Israel's genocide of Palestine.

[-] beansbeansbeans@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

The EU should put massive tariffs on American exports, and double those on weapons.

[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

Surprised Pikachu face moment.

What were they expecting? They've clearly showed to the world how quickly they can turn against their allies over nothing. Nobody will want to rely on them for their defense.

[-] Kualdir@feddit.nl 14 points 11 months ago

Oh so that was trumps play, he wanted us to specifically buy THEIR weapons to arm ourselves because that helps THEIR economy once again

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 12 points 11 months ago

Of course. That's all their "increase your military spending" whining was about. There are valid reasons to increase military spending but their whining isn't one.

[-] xenomor@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

It’s so un-American to not buy weapons from us. Who do these Europeans think they are?

[-] sircac@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago
[-] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago

You sidelined US companies the moment you enacted tariffs (among other things), you turd.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 4 points 11 months ago

Uh... too bad?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
374 points (100.0% liked)

News

36160 readers
3012 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS