193
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] tenseiken@lemmy.world 76 points 2 days ago

To be fair, they're probably just as qualified as he is.

[-] watson387@sopuli.xyz 31 points 2 days ago

Just seeing this dude's face pisses me off...

[-] Today@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

I was disappointed that SNL didn't make him look slimy enough.

[-] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

can you imagine what it must be like to do mainstream satire in 2025? fucking grim. if you want to be an optometrist, just remember that most of the best laughs come from some of the worst places. i just hope y'all can see that.

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

I can't tell if this is a bad optometrist joke or an autocorrect error and optometrist should have been optimist.

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago

Did they bring potato salad at least? That kind of bland basic all white potato salad that has no seasoning to it.

[-] Rakudjo@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

They've been added to the group chat

[-] zephorah@lemm.ee 7 points 2 days ago

He’s married?!?

Given the well publicized cheating and alcoholism, reinforced publicly by Hegsbeth’s mother, this cannot be a healthy relationship. Even so, it’s bring your wife to work day, never mind national security and the potential for Jerry Springer vibes with that national security. I’m fascinated. What is this family dynamic?

Unless, like it sometimes occurs in healthcare, Hegsbeth requires a support person to help him retain and interpret information given by those with advanced degrees and experience. That’s my best guess. Second guess is the executive branch is now full low EQ in supporting individuals who cannot go 10min in their lives without another person attached to them. (You can’t watch this movie alone it must be done together, you can’t go back for surgery prep alone we must be together until the last possible minute, my adult self can’t spend the night anywhere with my person, mommy?).

I have so many questions.

[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 5 points 2 days ago

Pa! Im getting married!
Well thats great son we'll get preparations going.
and pa guess what!
what.
shes a virgin!
thats it the weddings off!
but pa why?
if she aint good enough for family she aint good enough for you.

[-] Gowron_Howard@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

Qualifications are too “woke”. Fuck Republicans.

[-] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 3 points 2 days ago

Continuing to fill government positions with loyalists…

this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
193 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22612 readers
4238 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS