67

I realise that Google places ads in the native Gmail environment. However, when using a third party front end to embed the Google services, how does the company make money off that? When I use Thunderbird to access Gmail or the Google Calendar or when I map my Google Drive to the file explorer, how can Google profit from this kind of use?

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] slazer2au@lemmy.world 43 points 5 days ago

Metadata.

It knows who you are talking to from the to and from fields, possibly the context based on the subject, if the do scan the email contents then they will know what you are interested in.

Gather that info with your search history it can sell targeted advertising.

[-] jjpamsterdam@feddit.org 20 points 5 days ago

So, it's basically a loss leader in this scenario to feed other sevices like the ad network?

[-] slazer2au@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago

For personal Gmail yes.

[-] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Yes. About 75% of Google's revenue is from ads. Most (all?) of their free products exist to feed the advertising business in one way or another.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago

They're scanning the email contents.

and your google drive contents.

and everything else you send through their services.

[-] markvandijk@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 days ago

That's why I am no longer using their services like Gmail and Google Maps. I jumped tot alternatives, much recommended.

[-] brax@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago

What are you using in lieu of Google Maps?

[-] markvandijk@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I use GoogleStreetMap for GPS, I've replaced Gmail with StartMail and instead of Google Calendar I use TimeTree for now. Might need to find a real privacy related calendar, anyone suggestions?

[-] brax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

I was so confused by your first one until I clicked the link and realized you meant "OpenStreetView" instead of "GoogleStreetView" 🤣

[-] Yaky@slrpnk.net 5 points 5 days ago

I have been using Organic Maps for many years. They are offline-first, and use OpenStreetMap for the data. Since it's OpenStreetMap, quality might vary by country and even city.

If you're looking for more commercial app, HERE WeGo / Here Maps has traffic and online accounts.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

How’s the realtime traffic on those? I’m currently using magic earth and the routing is mostly okay compared to GMaps, but the traffic data is frequently stale.

[-] Yaky@slrpnk.net 1 points 5 days ago

TBH I haven't used traffic feature (or WeGo, really) enough to know if it's good.

[-] rocky1138@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago

Magic Earth is amazing

[-] masto@lemmy.masto.community 2 points 5 days ago

Google does not use the content of Gmail messages for ad targeting. Lots of misinformation here.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

it's interesting that you added a qualifier that I did not, to justify calling my statement "misinformation"

they are scanning your data. and while they may not be exploiting it for ad-targeting... they are almost certainly exploiting it. That's their business model: Scrape every ounce of data they can and exploit it every which way they can.

[-] masto@lemmy.masto.community 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

“Exploiting” means what, exactly? And what evidence do you have for it?

The content of your email is not used for targeting or profiling, it’s not being sold. Clear enough? The qualifier is because some “well ackshually” will point out that they have to scan it for spam filtering, virus detecting, adding calendar events, etc. These are features of the product, and I think labeling them exploitation would be a bit rich.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Exploiting means exactly what it means.

Once they have the scan, that’s their data. Of course they’re going to be using it for other things. The excuses they give, are of course, the foot in the door.

It’s a “bit rich” that you think you’re not the product.

[-] vvilld@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago

Remember: if you're not paying for a service, you're the product.

They harvest your data for a variety of reasons. 1) they pair your data with your broader Google profile (including search results, ad clicks, website views, etc) to better deliver targeted ads. 2) they train their AI (although that's an indirect revenue stream, and much more recent).

[-] callouscomic@lemm.ee 10 points 5 days ago

Remember: if you're paying for a service, you're also likely the product.

[-] fuzzzerd@programming.dev 1 points 5 days ago

Check the privacy policy. It's about all you can do these days, and hope it doesn't change post fact.

Remember: if you’re not paying for a service, you’re the product.

So... Tor network and Signal?

Wikipedia?

Archive.org?

Lemmy?

(Not all free services are evil lol 😉)

[-] hperrin@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago

I pay $10 a month to Wikipedia.

[-] slazer2au@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

None of those are business though, they are non profits

[-] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Protonmail (and other proton services) has a Free Tier, and it's company, Proton AG, were For Profit for a long time (until recently).

Tutanota (now known as Tuta) also has a Free Tier, and is still, to this day, a For Profit company.

Bitwarden allow you to store unlimited passwords, they are a For Profit compant.

Standard Notes let you have Unlimited Notes, and was For Profit until they got bought by Proton

Notesnook also allows Unlimited Notes, and is For Profit.

[-] Thunder@kbin.earth 16 points 5 days ago

they use your data to train their ai. they show you ads on other platforms and webs. they are fucking your privacy

[-] Ziggurat@jlai.lu 16 points 5 days ago

These data allows

  • To train AI model, which is considered as a gold mine today
  • To do targetted ads (Yes we do have blocker and so on but still)
[-] heavydust@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 days ago

Don't forget that most people do not use external applications such as Thunderbird. You're a blip on the radar.

[-] devx00@infosec.pub 11 points 5 days ago

I recommend the book The Age of Surveillance Capitalism by Shoshana Zuboff. It’s from 2018 but it is still very applicable. It explains what big tech is doing/trying to do with your data and how they intend to make money.

It’s info dense and may take some time to get through but it is very eye opening even for someone like myself that felt pretty well aware of their tactics and intentions before reading the book.

[-] Meron35@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Shoshana Zuboff really was ahead of its time. So many people who were privacy conscious and therefore thought they were clever by simply thinking that Google makes money by only selling your data completely missed the scale of manipulation and control big tech has (myself included).

Google/big tech doesn't sell your data. Google/big tech sells advertisers predictions of your behaviour, a highly refined, processed version of your data. Advertisers cannot purchase your data, only "impressions" or "views." In an extra sinister twist, Google/big tech then uses it's resources to manipulate you in ways such that their predictions become true.

This is why their predictions are the best, because after making them, they have a financial incentive to manipulate them into being true. It is why we naturally see more and more polarization, because after Google has sold the prediction that you will engage is a specific type of content (e.g. right ring rabbit holes), it is financially incentivised to make that a reality, and therefore further push you in that direction, to make their prediction true.

How to “improve” prediction using behavior modification - ScienceDirect - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169207022001066

[-] hperrin@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago

The knowledge of what you do, where you work, who you talk to, what you eat, who your doctor is, where you shop, everywhere you go, what diseases or disorders you have, what kind of clothes you wear, what your family life is like, etc, are incredibly valuable to a company trying to show you ads. It doesn’t matter if you don’t see them through Gmail. Google owns so much of the internet, you’ll see them eventually.

Get your email from an email company, not an ad company.

[-] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 12 points 5 days ago

Could be a loss leader to suppress competition and own the market, getting you into their other paid services. They probably also profit from your data either directly or through things like training AI.

[-] Nemo@slrpnk.net 10 points 5 days ago

Many people pay for additional storage on Google.

Plus tying your online identity to Google means you're more likely to use their other services.

[-] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 9 points 5 days ago

I think ads on Gmail are also a thing of the past, aren't they? The answer to your question is: no income. But you're having a constant time share lunch with Google to actually buy a share in a beachfront condo. By which I mean subscribe to their cloud and AI plan. Or YouTube. Or their business suite. Etc. And then they have converted you to a paying customer. The free service is an investment to get you hooked and then paying.

And in the meantime they can collect some data from you so when you're faced with ads they might be more effective.

[-] libra00@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

They're still collecting data that helps them sell ads.

[-] DannyBoy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago

I wonder what percentage of people access Gmail and Calendar through third party frontends in 2025. I would bet the number is very low.

this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2025
67 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

39675 readers
937 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS