I feel like Walt would approve hating on Israel.
I’ve heard it said that Walt was an antisemite, so I looked it up to confirm. According to an article in jewishpress.com the evidence that Walt was really an antisemite is weak but the MPA of the time had more things of concern.. That same article goes on to equate anti-Israel with antisemitism so I doubt they’d give Walt any benefit of a doubt.
I’m not on Twitter, but I hear getting exposure to actual vile antisemitism happens quite fast.
I cannot wait for us to be past this “any criticism of Israel is antisemitism” and the US funding a genocide phase.
I cannot wait for us to be past this “any criticism of Israel is antisemitism” and the US funding a genocide phase.
What makes you think we'll ever get past this? It's been going on since the founding of the state of Israel.
That’s a fair question. I guess I just hope (and do what I can) for a better future
Saying "free Palestine" does not equal "down with Israel and the Jews". Wanting freedom from oppression for one group is not an endorsement of violence or oppression against another.
down with Israel and the Jews
See, now you lost all credibility. There's no honest reason whatsoever to add "and the Jews" to that sentence.
Israel is not "the Jews".
What? They weren't actually making that argument, you realize that right? I think you're literally agreeing with them.
Yes they are, reread the comment. They're making a boring logical platitude, but they're equating Israel with "the Jews" in a way that's irrelevant to their point.
Again, there was no honest reason to add "and the Jews" to their comment other than to equate Israel with Jewish people in general. That's a tactic used by pro-genocide people to accuse anyone that protests Israel of being anti-Semitic.
No, they were summarizing the position of the people that they disagree with... Like you see the quotes, right? This isn't what they say or believe. It's pretty clear to me, from that one single comment, that they 100% don't equate Israel with "the Jews." It's like the entire point of their comment.
Maybe go back and reread what they said?
It’s hard to say…there’s this thing where a ton of people hate Jews but love Israel
Either way he would still be an anti-union jackass so I don't really care what he would think
I've seen no indication whatsoever that this person hates Israel.
I meant more along the lines of the episode of Family Guy where Peter shoots Cleveland Jr. On accident and Carter supports Peter because he shot a black person.
Yea, just not for the correct reasons.
I will remember her name and will never watch a movie with her. Fuck terrorists and their supporters
She supported Palestinians. Not the IDF. She's doing the opposite of supporting terrorists.
Where did she support terrorists? Major self-report my dude...
Guess you won’t be watching any movies with Gal Gadot then.
I dont know him/her so i guess yes
that's gonna be a long list with all the people who support the terrorist state of israel
You are mistaken, she was supporting Palestine, not the IDF.
Ahh the big fantasystate which stands for terrorism, sounds good
Yeah I already said IDF/Israel, what are you trying to say?
Ahh ok u are stupid, that explains it. Ty dont waste my rime anymore.
What do you mean? You said she supports the terrorist state but she supports Palestine. It seems you were mistaken thinking she supports the terrorist IDF.
Sooo... Fuck the USA?
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News