147
all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 7 months ago
  • Obtain fleet of excavators to dig heads out of sand.
  • Scrap the pink shirts and auction bid signs.
[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 14 points 7 months ago

The path is through AoC and Bernie. While I appreciate Pritzker's seemingly well-intentioned efforts he's part of the elites and can get fucked.

[-] RedWeasel@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago

The path is through AoC and Bernie. While I appreciate Pritzker’s seemingly well-intentioned efforts he’s part of the elites and can get fucked.

He may be one of the elites, but he has been doing much more to fight for working class workers than many/most politicians even in the Democratic party right now. I agree AOC and Bernie are great, but that doesn't mean they can do it themselves alone.

[-] astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz 13 points 7 months ago

As an Illinoisan, Pritzker is the exception that proves the rule. He uses his money for good, and has been amazing for the state. He really shows that billionaires can do good but the vast majority choose not to.

So, with that said, I'm all for letting him lead with AOC and Bernie. He can really bankroll efforts.

[-] blattrules@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

Anything other than pushing aoc and Bernie is going to fail and they’re absolutely going to do it again because they’ve learned nothing.

[-] ShyCake 6 points 7 months ago

Formorer chicagolander:

I was never the most informed of pritzker, as I didn't start payong attention to politics until covid. The first thing I remembered hearingvabout him is that he tried to evade some property taxes in some houses he owned by removing the toilets, didn't work though. I found it more amusing than anything else

I remember when the covid crisisvstarted, he he did his best to reassure people with daliy press briefings. I also remember that pritzker was always at odds with trump. I hear he still is. Yeah I'd vote for him, maybe not over sanders, or aoc (I'd have to think about it), but I think he'd do a good job. Hasn't got any complaints from me, more than I can say from most Democratics.

[-] meangreenbeans@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Have you tried doing something, anything, yet?

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

He’s trying to draw a chart; does that count?

[-] nothingcorporate@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Oh yeah, counter a billionaire with a billionaire... No thank you.

I wish Walz and Pritzker and AOC and the handful of other Democrats who have more than two neurons in their skulls would just say “fuck this, fuck you, new party”. The DNC got us here. The DNC isn’t going to get us out of this, if we even can get out of this.

this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
147 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26153 readers
2921 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS