713

Summary

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz Tim Walz warns that Trump may soon arrest political opponents and potentially groom one of his sons, likely Donald Jr., as a successor.

"It's going to get very dark," Walz told CNN, citing Trump's defiance of a judge's order on Venezuelan migrants and calls to impeach a federal judge as evidence of authoritarian tendencies.

He expressed concern that Democratic leaders underestimate Trump’s authoritarianism and public frustration with both parties.

Walz criticized Schumer’s handling of the GOP spending bill and questioned how Democrats will rebuild institutions damaged by Trump.

(page 2) 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MithranArkanere@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

Democrats won't do a thing. They are in on it. They have been ratcheting towards oligarchy little by little.

They need to be replaced.

[-] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Most of them, but there are ones like him who still have integrity. Don't toss them aside.

[-] prole 10 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Oh no didn't you get the memo? Democrats are worse and more to blame for what's currently happening than Republicans and you're a dirty liberal if you disagree.

No nuance allowed.

[-] meyotch@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 day ago

AOC and Bernie are on tour. Walz might be ok, but he’s still on probation until he shows true spine, not just very good rhetoric.

I would very much like to know of other Federal office holders we can count on. I am serious, not baitin’. Looking to find some hope and figure out who to boost or help.

[-] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

All I've seen him do so far is talk and be part of a losing Presidential ticket. What is he doing?

[-] AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 9 points 22 hours ago

Following Bernie's lead and doing town hall meetings in Republican districts, which is where all of these sound bites are coming from. And he's not gaslighting us or sanewashing the actions of the GOP right now which is refreshing.

I'm not sure what else he could be doing right now tbh, he's governor of Minnesota and we're pretty gridlocked politically at the moment - nationally the only thing he's got is being on that losing presidential ticket, his main motivation seems to be the Democrats winning elections to make people's lives better even if he isn't the presidential nominee in a few years.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 day ago

We've all been understanding this even while Walz et al were talking about how they might run in a few years.

Only argument is I see no way trump trusts don jr with even being a figurehead.

[-] SnotFlickerman 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They're gonna put in Barron because he knows how to turn on a computer. That's a step of competency above his other sons. Also, they'll want the youngest one in for the longest-lived dictatorship.

Further, Barron has made inroads in the right wing podcast ecosystem. The other Trump boys are still living in the 90's, they'll want someone who understands the modern era and can influence it.

[-] prole 5 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Barron is really good with cyber

[-] AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 4 points 23 hours ago

Long term maybe, but short term Barron is too young and the Constitution isn't ambiguous about the age limits - and even if it's worth little more than toilet paper it serves the Republicans to keep it around as a zombie so they can keep pretending this is a democracy.

[-] SnotFlickerman 12 points 23 hours ago

Dude, they already stopped giving a fuck about the Constitution. We're literally in the middle of a Constitutional crisis. They're ignoring the courts.

I'm so tired of hearing this "blah blah blah Consitution doesn't allow" they will make it allow it. Just like how Bannon was quoted that they're working on Trump's third term, which means they're just going to re-interpret everything into their favor.

Just like how they just argued that they needed to deport Venezuelans with no criminal history because somehow that means they're more dangerous to the US than those with a criminal history.

Just stop this checks and balances nonsense, that shit's over. In four years it will be dead and in it's grave.

[-] vaguerant@fedia.io 13 points 1 day ago

He prefers to groom Ivanka anyway.

[-] magic_smoke 14 points 1 day ago

The only solace is that the fuckers who are feeding us to the machine are the ones who are going to get minced first.

Spineless fucks.

[-] SnotFlickerman 20 points 1 day ago

It's really crazy that they think capitulation will save them and we already have tons of examples of groups complying with this batshit administration and then immediately getting punished anyway.

[-] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

This is what happens when people refuse to learn about history. We are doomed to repeat the same mistakes, and instead of facing it head-on, people would rather ignore it or change it entirely.

[-] prole 3 points 23 hours ago

And it's exactly why conservatives have made it a priority to dismantle education.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Yeah I gotta say, avenues and windows of action are closing. We're running out of choices if we dont want to live under a dictatorship for the next twenty or more years.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

I wonder from time to timecwhat method the Trumpists are going to adopt for killing their opponents.

Defenestration is self-evidently effective, but it's already Putin's schtick. And while it might appeal to Trump to essentially pay tribute to his idol, I think it's more likely that he'd want his own brand.

The US being what it is, some sort of handgun "suicide" would be on-brand, and courts have already shown that they're willing to let things like "suicide" by gunshot to the back of the head or "suicide" by multiple gunshot slide.

I almost expect them to use concentration camps and gas chambers, counting on the media to refuse to cover it at all for fear that somebody might make a Nazi comparison.

We'll see...

[-] noxypaws@pawb.social 2 points 19 hours ago

Prison neglect, violence by police, stochastic terror, criminalizing healthcare

[-] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 18 hours ago

Those are some of the bits of structural violence with which they intend to kill people broadly.

I'm wondering more about the specific techniques they're going to use for targeted killings - like, for instance, what they're going to do when Trump decides he wants Tim Walz killed.

[-] noxypaws@pawb.social 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Stochastic probably.

Or kidnap and disappear.

There's really nothing preventing them from doing in broad daylight the worst, most blatant shit either of us can imagine.

[-] Asmodeus_Krang@infosec.pub 2 points 1 day ago

This is the same Tim Walz that champions civil disarmament? Now he's warning us about the very thing that the right to bear arms is supposed to protect the people against. Glad Tim and his party didn't succeed in making us all impotent in the face of this fascist regime.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
713 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22046 readers
3485 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS