671
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 81 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

War on drugs - drugs won

War on terror - terror won

War on woke - 🤞

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

It's never been about defeating those things, it's about expanding power using them as an excuse.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 year ago

Exactly.

  1. War on Drugs - reduce minority voice in government
  2. War on Terror - PATRIOT Act, or whatever its current incarnation is
  3. War on Woke - probably government access to medical records and/or privacy generally, but I guess we'll see
[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

War on Drugs - reduce minority voice in government

And increase incarceration of certain people to expand legal slavery under the 13th amendment.

expand legal slavery

Maybe in some states, but in many (most?), they just become a burden on taxpayers.

[-] AllHailZorglub@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Considering how tired and sleepy I feel, they may be winning this one.

[-] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

interesting

[-] smol_beans@lemmy.world 66 points 1 year ago

His one job was to create profit for weapons manufacturers and he did that job very very well

His job was to do Israel’s bidding and remove Saddam.

That's a nice side effect.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Just like the "war on drugs" was never about stopping drugs, this was never about stopping terrorism.

[-] straightjorkin@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

When you wage a war on an enemy, you win when the enemy is dead. When you wage a war on an idea, there's no final end point.

[-] tkmtlmike@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

No, man! He said war OF Terror...

[-] Patrik@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago
[-] rImITywR@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago
[-] Stepskippin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

New skill unlocked: "Lie with energy and in a few years fact checking becomes diabolical."

[-] Meep@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

First they funded, supported, and grew the terrorism, and THEN, they fought the terrorism. Then they funded other terrorists. But it's always in countries with natural resources they want.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Are we really going back this far, right at this moment?

[-] Kurroth@aussie.zone 7 points 1 year ago

Mate, I was traumatised when Dragonball z and Pokémon were interrupted before school and this dude was on all the TV stations.

Nothing has been any good sense.

[-] GooberEar@lemmy.wtf 1 points 1 year ago

Gonna be honest, the idiom/meme "had one job" is almost never correct or appropriate and the role of president is certainly a situation where it does not apply. I find it irksome, most of the time, when people say/type it, without actually thinking things through and applying it appropriately. Don't care if it is an unpopular opinion because it is a fact that it is used incorrectly the vast majority of the time and haters gonna hate, only true appreciators gonna appreciate.

this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
671 points (100.0% liked)

Greentext

8289 readers
541 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS