363

So,

  1. What an absolutely bitch ass snowflake move.

  2. Well good luck with that and going to be funny when people are still pissed.

What a utter pathetic snowflake.

top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] bravesilvernest@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 hours ago

The “town hall” tem generally connotes...

Fuck the rep and all, but what is happening in this article? Spelling and grammatic issues all over the place...

[-] geekwithsoul@lemm.ee 29 points 17 hours ago

So less "town hall" and more "klan rally" - got it

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 152 points 22 hours ago

I wonder how this is legal? Sounds like taxation without representation.

[-] admin@lemmy.haley.io 23 points 18 hours ago

DC: first time?

[-] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 22 points 22 hours ago

Unless the town hall is paid for with taxpayer dollars or held on government property, it's a citizen who happens to be in Congress having a private event with their political supporters.

Same as a political party convention or fundraiser dinner,.AFAIK.

(And, depending on state law, even a function on government property may be legally private.)

[-] grue@lemmy.world 30 points 20 hours ago

No, that's not how it works.

[-] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

So, how does it work? Does your state have a law requiring congressional "town halls" to be open to the public?

[-] Malek061@lemmy.world 36 points 19 hours ago

Town halls by their definition are open to the public. He is holding a private campaign event.

He is lying to the public by calling it a town hall.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 12 points 19 hours ago

Or it is a town hall, and he's lying to the public by claiming he's allowed to exclude non-Republicans.

[-] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

"town hall" is a style of event. Back when there were meaningful debates during presidential campaigns, it used to be a regular choice.

I guarantee you that they were closed events, with attendees chosen legally-arbitrarily by whatever TV network was hosting the event.

So long as he takes questions from those in attendance, it's a town hall. Even if no cameras are allowed.

[-] Malek061@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

The public put their name in a hat and submitted questions for presidential debates. Those people were picked to speak. Still was open to everyone. This is not a town hall.

[-] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

I assure you that anyone who ever put on a town hall debate, including the League of Women voters and definitely the TV networks, screened the questions and reserved the right to exclude anyone they chose to.

No debate or political event since well before Nixon/Kennedy has been "open to everyone".

[-] Malek061@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

You missed the point. Anyone can apply. The questions are screened. They don't discriminate based on party.

[-] 4am@lemm.ee 13 points 20 hours ago

14 upvotes? Take a civics class you schmucks, Jesus tapdancing Christ

[-] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

So, what rule do you think makes "congressional town halls" work differently than any other campaign activity?

[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago

I think the main point is that non-republicans are still forced to pay taxes, but the elected official is denying those people representation. If he wants to hold a non-republican only event for equal representation, then that's a really dumb way to do it, but at least is closer to acceptable.

It's the "taxation without representation" thing, not the "blocking a demographic from their private event" thing.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 4 points 21 hours ago

"taxation without representation" I believe was a slogan, not a legally binding principle.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

I get ya. It was a rallying cry for revolution, not really anything that ended up in writing as law.

[-] SpaceRanger13@lemm.ee 72 points 22 hours ago

These fucking idiots willfully forget they are supposed to represent everyone in their districts. I hope everyone else in his district makes a picket line to keep all the traitors out.

[-] johncandy1812@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago

The people who bought them don't appreciate them working for other people.

[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 35 points 22 hours ago

there would be a larger crowd outside than those allowed in.

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 11 points 21 hours ago

I'm picturing a moat of people, like 30-60 feet deep around the event. A couple orders of magnitude more people outside than inside. And thinking that might give an impression.

[-] lolola 58 points 22 hours ago

"GOP rep discontinues town halls, switches to private party meetings"

[-] pivot_root@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

"GOP rep discontinues private party meetings, switches to private prerecorded video Q&A on X"

[-] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 54 points 22 hours ago

Ah, so a bunch of assholes smelling their own farts. Got it.

[-] lectricleopard@lemmy.world 33 points 21 hours ago

I'm in a town hall rn. Waiting for it to start anyway. My rep is a dem, and guess what? No restrictions on attendees. Imagine that!

[-] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 29 points 22 hours ago

Can't you just say you are one and walk in? Idk how they check that if you never registered.

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 22 hours ago

I'm sure there will be a lot of, well, let's say "visual inspection" going on to enter these town halls, if you catch my drift. It probably won't matter if you claim to be a Republican but are brown, black, female, or under the age of 50.

[-] nxn@biglemmowski.win 26 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Come on, they're just simple dress code requirements

Business casual: red cap, formal: white hood

[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

With or without the eye holes?

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 14 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Straight cis white male liberals rise up - it looks like there's a problem to solve and the minorities can't solve it themselves.

It's the opportunity you've been waiting for!

(This is ribbing in jest. Allies are awesome)

[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Party registration is public data in Arizona. They provide a ton of data, actually. A lot of states just provide name and party affiliation and maybe zip code or whatever. But you can often just buy it.

If they required people to RSVP, it’d probably be pretty easy for a political party to cross reference and check ID. (It seems Arizona sells the list to political parties and mere citizens have the right to inspect the voter rolls. Whatever that means.)

Source: https://www.ncsl.org/elections-and-campaigns/access-to-and-use-of-voter-registration-lists

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 5 points 21 hours ago

Looks like it's my time to shine.

[-] HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth 9 points 22 hours ago

They'll just fill the place with known loyalists, party officials, and MAGA social media influencers, denying access to actual republican voters.

They'll be quiet and listen to their master like good little boys and girls, and then they'll go on social media and say "see? our town hall was full of republicans and it was peaceful! your town hall must have been infiltrated by socialists!"

The town hall outrage will just become another charade, if it hasn't already, very very soon.

[-] lectricleopard@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago

I had to check in at the door at my reps town hall in nys.. There was a list of folks that rsvp. I got the invite by email, so I bet it's based on voter registration, and if you walk up at aren't registered R, no dice.

[-] ragingdachshund@lemm.ee 4 points 15 hours ago

Boy, it’s a good thing there aren’t vets that voted R (or other non-insane R’s) that will totally stay home and be quiet.

[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 15 points 21 hours ago

Ahh yes, a true representative of the people! 🥴

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago
[-] neuro_88@lemm.ee 4 points 20 hours ago

Echo chamber effect. Dumbass.

this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
363 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22011 readers
4653 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS