652

White House officials said the installation was an effort to increase internet availability at the complex. They said that some areas of the property could not get cell service and that the existing Wi-Fi infrastructure was overtaxed.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 23 points 9 hours ago

Yalls remember the security concerns when that sailor secretly installed a star link on a US warship?

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 35 points 18 hours ago

They said that some areas of the property could not get cell service and that the existing Wi-Fi infrastructure was overtaxed.

Starlink has absolutely nothing to do with either of those things...

[-] icmpecho@lemmy.ml 15 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

this was nothing that some Ethernet and some APs couldn't fix. and as for the cellular issues, you're literally the White House. Throw up a femtocell, you already have fiber for backhaul.

this is such fucking nonsense. Starlink is fixing precisely none of this.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 8 points 9 hours ago

I mean I think it's safe to say these issues never existed in the first place. Nothing but more fables from the liar in Chief.

[-] icmpecho@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 hours ago

agree 100%, I just find what limited joy I can in pointing out that this is likely bullshit and at best a con. I also get a kick out of shitting on Musk for pretending to know what he's talking about when it comes to tech :)

[-] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 1 points 6 hours ago

I worked it some shitty old bunkers that no one cared about and they had wifi and cell service in every room. But the white house doesn't That's fucking hysterical

[-] Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 10 hours ago

Amazing how the but her emails crowd is fine with all the private servers and now private internet access from Trump and co

[-] arc@lemm.ee 26 points 18 hours ago

I do not believe for a second that communications within the Whitehouse are inadequate, or if they were, could not be solved in a secure manner. Slapping a Starlink in a few places sounds like an invitation to backdoor all communications. Not only that, it is an invitation to sidestep obligations to preserve government records.

[-] Suoko@feddit.it 1 points 8 hours ago
[-] notannpc@lemmy.world 36 points 20 hours ago

Ah yes, because what the white house needs is an inferior ISP to plug the gaps that could easily be filled by proper wireless access point configuration and distribution.

This is definitely not going to come back to haunt us later.

[-] icmpecho@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 hours ago

depending on how badly Starlink fucks up the deployment, this could actually make the performance worse especially if airtime and spectrum are limited which I would assume would be the case. Elon throwing APs every which way isn't likely to make that any better.

this is like getting a flat tire on your handcart and buying a G Wagon with no wheels to fix it.

[-] Zier@fedia.io 133 points 1 day ago

They literally installed spyware in the WH. National security is an utter joke with these traitors.

[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 51 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

This country was destroyed under Reagan. We needed a national security strategy against the capitalists back then and instead invited them into the government.

This is just the fire sale, the vultures picking the well rotted corpse clean. Reagan and Welch destroyed this place, don't give Trump that much credit. He's just an opportunist who saw profit in chaos.

The United States 1776-1980 - Died of thirst waiting for Promised Golden Showers of Prosperity that never came - Useful Idiots

[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 224 points 1 day ago

In any healthy democracy, this would have been seen as a scandal exposing signs of corruption and would have likely resulted in the dissolution of the government and early election.

But the US is not a healthy democracy.

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago

Not to worry, "some cited security concerns." We're all set

[-] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 day ago

Besides the security concerns, I want to know what they’re using it for, and how much bullshit they’re hiding by avoiding the official network.

It’s certainly not a speed and convenience thing.

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago

Yes. That’s the joke. I’m unsure how the burning terminator dying with a thumbs up wasn’t clear enough that there is obviously more to this than just “security concerns”

[-] tabular@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Given it's unrepresentative voting system I think how much is enough to be a democracy. T hot take for people that see democracy. Two parties to choose from is just one more than a clear dictatorship. If neither actually represents you then yeah it's not healthy .

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Agreed, except for one point. It's an oligarchy. Our "dictator" was just selling cars on the White House lawn. Capitalism won to get to it's late stages, happy to let racist hatred and russian influence fester for continued capital self-interest

[-] shades@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 15 hours ago

Shoulda put a Trojan on that trojan.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 37 points 22 hours ago

Are you a white house staffer carrying a heavy stack of top secret documents? Do you desperately need both hands to vape or to text roger stone a progress report? Try DOCDASH!

Just request a docdasher in app and a helpful person like Yvegeny, Dmitri or Boris will show up to the white house on a motorcycle, take your documents from you, not copy and transmit them, and just keep them very safe, like tippy top safe.

[-] SnortsGarlicPowder@lemmy.zip 32 points 23 hours ago

Somebody is going to have to explain to me how starlink is going to boost WiFi availability if it is routed from offsite using their current fibre network.

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 15 points 22 hours ago

Yeah, this doesn't make sense to me. Starlink needs a dish that has to be outside without trees covering it, so it isn't like they can place new routers around the building that receive Starlink and have wifi capability. They will still have to run a cable from the dish(es?) to new wireless routers. How is that ANY different from just running new wireless routers from their existing fiber?

[-] ECB@feddit.org 5 points 18 hours ago

It's literally not any different. Starlink is just a less-reliable broadband internet connection, it has nothing to do with WiFi

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 18 hours ago

Because now you don't have to run wires from the existing network to the new WiFi, you just plop them both in the new location!

But then if you want the access points to act like one WiFi network so walking around doesn't reset all your connections, all you have to do is run cables to the new WiFi access points from the original signal, unplug them from Star Link, then wire starlink into the main uplink as a fail over or something! Easy!

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 116 points 1 day ago

If you live in the DC area, absolutely do NOT sign up for this service.

100% chance that the government, as well as musks companies would be monitoring you directly 24/7.

[-] Kirp123@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Well now the Chinese and Russians just need to get a way into Shartlink and they can also monitor you and your government.

[-] brossman@infosec.pub 15 points 1 day ago

they're already in, guaranteed

[-] BagOfHeavyStones@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

Run everything through a VPN tunnel instead?

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 25 points 1 day ago

Don't support fascists. Even if you have a VPN.

[-] cupcakezealot 21 points 22 hours ago

Starlink should be abolished.

[-] a_postmodern_hat@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Musk is literally a James Bond villain. Literally. Like LITERALLY a Bond villain.

Edit: minus the genius and charisma

[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

Imagine how galling this must be for Jeff Bezos. He's put so much effort into his Bond villain persona. The guy even now looks like Dr Evil. But he's being out eviled by a pudgy, dorky-looking South African nepo-baby.

[-] madjo@feddit.nl 17 points 1 day ago

He even bought the James Bond license from the Broccoli family!

[-] EaterOfLentils@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago

"Minus the genius and charisma"

You're describing an Austin Powers villain.

[-] VoodooAcupuncture@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

Security concerns? No need to eavesdrop on electronics when they have Tulsi to just tell them everything.

[-] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

The existing Wi-Fi infrastructure was “overtaxed” so they just threw up satellite instead of , I don’t know, improving the Wi-Fi infrastructure? There’s perfectly fine WiFi at sprawling work and college campuses, and stadiums that seat tens of thousands of people. What a joke.

[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Enjoy the high latency.

[-] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago

Are they then routing all starlink traffic to Russia?

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago

FFS, can we deal with these fucking traitors already?!?

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 10 hours ago

We're only a couple of months into this administration. We're super duper fucked.

[-] xzot746@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago

Well it looks like more people need to be screwed over, I guess maybe after it affects enough "Me's" it'll probably stay the same. The amount of damage that will be done before the American people stand up will be immense.

I honestly cannot believe that the average American is in agreement with this and that they think holding signs up will do anything. Sorry but they say violence is never the right course of action, but I think in this case you might need to see if that well regulated militia is ready to defend your freedom.

And shame on the Democratic party for just rolling over.

[-] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 day ago

President Musk making it feel more like home.
Add 13 children of ambiguous parentage he can ignore, and snug as a bug!

[-] EaterOfLentils@lemmy.world 9 points 23 hours ago

I am all for making the White House less secure at this point.

[-] _LordMcNuggets_@feddit.org 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Anyone see the Johnny English with the American billionaire cyber-terrorist Jason Volta as the main antagonist?

That's how I see news coming from Washington developing on a daily basis.

We need you Rowan Atkinson.

[-] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

It would be a shame if some foreign actor could monitor Starlink internal networks.

[-] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago

So they routed all traffic in the WH through his sattelites, yay. Do I understand correctly that being an internet provider (and as WH can be singled out) means he can now know what resources everyone there access and force many proxy\VPN options shut? So he can get at least basic understanding if someone access matrix servers or whatever to leak data critical of DOGE, to block things he doesn't like (e.g. live streaming broadcast for select journalists) or just to get one more reason to fire everyone?

[-] interested_party@lemmy.org 4 points 22 hours ago

Who's hand is on the power switch?

[-] bstix@feddit.dk 9 points 1 day ago

it's necessary so the Saudis can livestream all the blowjobs and asslickling happening in the oval office.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] madjo@feddit.nl 5 points 1 day ago

sure "donated" until the next president, whenever that happens...

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
652 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

66892 readers
4509 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS