935
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Had to drop a friend when he told me that "God sent Trump to us to stop abortions"

[-] Zacryon@feddit.org 49 points 1 day ago

Reminds me of the Epicurean Paradox:

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

You could replace "God" with "Parents" to the same effect.

But arguing that a parent is evil because they see a child committing an error, know it is an error, and decline to intercede doesn't rationally follow. If you helicopter over your kids and intercede every time they make mistakes, they never develop into independent and mature adults. You also induce a lot of anxiety, as you're constantly interposing yourself between the child's desires and actions without the ability to convey the wisdom of your decisions. So the kid sees you as the harmful force, rather than the thing you're seeking to avert.

So what's a Parent/God to do? Do you puppet your child, never letting them stray farther than the length of a string? Do you lock your child in a padded ceil and hand-feed them every day? Do you hardwire their programming, so they can't deviate from your design, acting exclusively on a divine instinct?

Is that really what we consider "Goodness"?

There is also the Calculation Problem to consider. A God-like intelligence might be able to observe far more than a human without being perfectly omniscient. Similarly, they might be able to calculate probabilities more quickly and accurately without being perfectly prescient. If a Parent/God knows most of the things but is not omniscient, does that mean they are unworthy of your attention or the reception of wisdom? At the same time, is it the duty of a Parent/God to restrict the actions of the others in their domain to the things they can calculate in advance? This brings us back to the idea of the Child Prisoner or Brainwashed Child. You're safe at the expense of any kind of growth or personal liberty. God treats you like a farmer treats a veal calf - perfectly unspoiled through inaction.

And finally, there is the problem of Entropy. A God who can foresee everything and recognizes that Evil is inevitable. Is such a God responsible for this Evil simply because it can perceive it? Is such a God responsible for this Evil simply because it cannot prevent it? Is this flaw in God's power a reason to reject it as a source of virtue?

Consider Odin hanging from Yggdrasil, his eye plucked out in pursuit of a way to prevent Ragnorak. He is not all-powerful. He is not-all knowing. He is routinely makes mistakes and even acts out of anger, lust, or petty vengeance. He is fundamentally flawed as dieties come. And yet his primary goal and function - to prevent the end of the world - seems noble enough to justifiably cultivate a religious following.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 5 points 1 day ago

Parents cannot prevent evil and are not all powerful.

[-] bufalo1973@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Parents aren't all powerful. But the Abrahamic god is (according to their faith) all powerful. So it could stop any war, any disease, any pain, ... but does not. Either it's not all powerful or not good. Choose. Or, as I think, doesn't exist.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Parents aren’t all powerful.

From the perspective of a newborn, they might as well be. Everything you need to be happy, healthy, and comfortable is actively managed by the parent. You don't understand anything about your condition or your history or your source of care. All you know is the id-based impulses to complain when you don't feel good and the soothing release of your feeding, playing, and sleeping cycles.

So it could stop any war, any disease, any pain, … but does not.

What would that look like, from a practical perspective? Imagine trying to explain to a baby that you're going to stick a needle into its skin in order to prevent it from suffering a disease, when it has no conception of disease. All you know is the pain of the needle. Must you conclude, from that pain, that your nurse is fundamentally evil for inflicting this upon you? And that, by extension, your parents are evil for bringing you to this nurse?

"If parents were truly worthy of my attention, they would have found a better method of vaccinating me than this needle!" is the sort of thing you get to say as a child, precisely because you do not understand the underlying nature of the world you live in. All you know is the scolding language of a parent cajoling you into this immediate superficial pain.

Should humankind be incapable of performing wars? What does that look like? Should humankind be incapable of contracting disease? What does that look like? Should humankind be incapable of experiencing pain, even? Is that what you really want? An eternal numbness of being? Is godly perfection just being a particularly resilient tree?

Either it’s not all powerful or not good.

One can be both exceptionally powerful and exceptionally good without needing to draw a distinction between the two. One can be beyond comprehension, as well. But the argument that a single person experiencing a single moment of discomfort disproves a benevolent deity seems to throw the proverbial baby out with the bath water.

[-] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

From the perspective of a newborn, they might as well be.

Not in comparison to God. My mom can't flood the Earth killing everybody.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

My mom can’t flood the Earth killing everybody.

Ask the kids of Andrea Yates whether they can tell the difference.

[-] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Seeing as I'm alive, I can tell you the difference.

[-] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Lol. What a lengthy way to say "I am an idiot"

[-] Doctor_Satan@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago

If you read the Bible with a purely objective mind and come away thinking God is the good guy in the story, I have some serious questions about your morality and ethics.

[-] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

"Love and worship me or you'll be sent to hell for all eternity hehe"

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Username checks out?

[-] Dropper_Post@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

That is exactly true. Life is only about 3 things: food, reproduction and dealing with boredom. Humans add so many colours to that, that it looks like we do more than those 3 things so that's where you might see free will.

[-] amadeus84@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

I like to think of why people suffer or God allows it like this. Even if you don’t think there is a plan, 70 years on earth vs an infinity of bliss is a good deal.

[-] interested_party@lemmy.org 2 points 1 day ago

I think of this too, and then I think God gave humans a brain to figure out what to do.

[-] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

I'm also sick of hearing people say, "God never gives you more than you can handle."

I know people who have been driven batshit insane by what God has given them.

[-] Devanismyname@lemmy.ca 1 points 22 hours ago

Free will is an illusion.

[-] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Cults and organised religion - name a surprisingly compatible combo.

[-] Zerush@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Church dilemma - knowing the will of God vs affirming that God's ways are inscrutable, According to convenience

[-] CouncilOfFriends@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 day ago

What’s the use of being god if every run-down schmuck with a two dollar prayer book can come along and fuck up your plan?

- George Carlin

https://youtu.be/PlzbFxYy08c

[-] FrostBlazer@lemm.ee 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I don’t think many Christians would actually argue for that first point tbh. It’s not something Biblically portrayed as one of God’s gifts. Free will is portrayed as something that was given conditionally, but taking from the tree of knowledge and specifically eating the fruit of knowledge is known as man’s first sin in the Bible.

I think it’s a bit of a metaphor for a parent wanting to shield their child from the harshness of reality, but as the sheltered child grows older they often want to know more about the outside world and in doing so become exposed to the cruelty. This was my own experience with religion growing up. A teacher of mine one day sat us down and pleaded the above with our class, as many of us grew to see through the veil of how reality looked.

In retrospect I think some things about the world make sense to not be told about, depending on one’s age. However, I think other things should never be hidden, have been hidden, or done in other cases.

Side note: I think the idea of God’s plan is for people to hold love for one another. Lots of people lose sight of what they are called to do and how they are to act though. They’re called to love their neighbor as their self, called to love their enemy, and called to forgive others for their transgressions. I personally think people are called to do good works in conjunction with holding faith, as people are called to act righteously in this life.

[-] psud@aussie.zone 7 points 1 day ago

Don't worry, they don't read the Bible, and especially don't read the old testament.

They believe they have god given freedom of action

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 52 points 2 days ago

Yup.

The teachings of Christianity don't make any fucking sense. (Unless you're willing to gaslight yourself for a lifetime.)

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[-] callouscomic@lemm.ee 29 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Now now, don't discount free reign to also gaslight others for a lifetime as well. And judge and shame others too. It's great for complete assholes.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

Did god not have the power to give us free will without also giving us evil?

  • Had the power but opted not to: god is himself some part evil

  • Didn't have the power, did the best he could with the tools he had: god is not omnipotent.

Pick one.

[-] Earflap@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago

Maybe god itself doesn't have free will and is only acting according to a proscribed set of fundamental laws.

[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

That's the point - the christian god is presented as all powerful, all knowing, and all good. The existence of evil in our universe shows that to be a lie.

[-] Earflap@reddthat.com 1 points 20 hours ago

I think this is a really interesting read on the matter: https://www.mit.edu/people/dpolicar/writing/prose/text/godTaoist.html

Christianity has gone completely off the rails and isn't the answer, but that doesn't necessarily mean there isn't a god.

[-] samus12345@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago

Going by the Bible, it's both. He acted with malice and proved himself to not be omnipotent many times.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] BigBenis@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You have the freedom to choose God or face an eternity of unimaginable suffering.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2025
935 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

48672 readers
1641 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS