Who would have thought it was the yanks drinking the fascist koolaid this time around.
Nobody should be surprised. The Nazi's ideas of eugenics were born in America. In 1939 the second-largest Nazi party was in America. A lot of Americans at the time thought we should be fighting for the other side.
There was a Nazi rally at Madison Square Gardens. The US is very nationalistic (How many countries force their children to pledge alliance to the flag daily?) and that can easily become a problem.
The US is very nationalistic (How many countries force their children to pledge alliance to the flag daily
The usa doesn't force the children... You do understand that right? There's actually been a very high profile case over it
Legally, schools and teachers can't force a student to perform the pledge of allegiance. But it's also taught so early in school that most students don't even question it as something to do.
Anectdotally: I was regularly performing the pledge of allegiance (literally said every morning of school) since kindergarten in the US. Also anecdotally: I've literally seen a teacher scold student(s) for not performing the pledge of allegiance. The latter case may not be as common; but the former definitely is common in the US.
Ok, you see how that's not forcing though. A teacher is not the literal country
You're being pedantic. The original point is referring to how indoctrinating the pledge of allegiance can be. If you're being made to do something since you're a very young kid and risk being scolded when you don't do it: you're essentially being forced.
Pedantic? It's pedantic to call someone out on a lie? Bulllllshit. I was a kid. There was no issue when I didn't do it.
No, it is not "essentially being forced".
K
10/10 response. Love it when people just lie and pretend they're right
The fact that there was a high profile case might indicate that it’s not as trivially optional as you make it seem.
...the fact that there was a successful case proves that it is in fact optional.
Not necessarily. It does prove that it legally should be optional.
Legally it's not required, socially it basically is, and there's real costs to going against that.
So, you're technically right, maybe. It's still not normal for a democracy.
There isn't real costs. It's not socially basically required.
Either way, socially forced is not the country itself forcing it.
So many stories Americans have written on here and Reddit contradict that.
Either way, socially forced is not the country itself forcing it.
Okay, sure. So what?
You do realize that the bad is amplified on social media, right?
Okay, sure. So what?
So the statement given was false. And state forcing is completely different from social pressure in ethical terms.
I do, and I've adjusted for that. I know Americans and I know how they are about their nationalism.
You do understand that right?
They probably don't. Same type of person that brings up Flint MI even though they've addressed the issue
You do realize fixing the water supply doesn't address the health issues caused from lead exposure automatically, Right? The water supply may be better comparatively. But the issues that it causes in Flint, Michigan are far from resolved.
And Israel doing the genocide.
The link in the article to Rheinmetall's history page is particularly interesting. They tell it straight like it was.
As a German defence company, we feel a special responsibility to contribute to the culture of remembrance and commemoration in the context of the Second World War. We have thoroughly examined and documented our role and our transgressions during the Nazi era.
German philosopher Hans-Georg Moeller: Guilt Pride: A German Vanity Project Conquering the World
History never repeats, but it rhymes.
The denizens of Muskyland will be pointing and shouting about Nazi's if VW plants start making armaments.
Electric tanks? Hybrids maybe?
A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/