1186
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] chairsushi@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 18 hours ago

Then let it be over then.

[-] CMDR_Horn@lemmy.world 36 points 21 hours ago

Good. I hope this is what happens.

  1. LLM algorithms can be maintained and sold to corpos to scrape their own data so they can use them for in house tools, or re-sell them to their own clients.
  2. Open Source LLMs can be made available for end users to do the same with their own data, or scrape whats available in the public domain for whatever they want so long as they don't re-sell
  3. Altman can go fuck himself
[-] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 14 points 18 hours ago

But if you stop me from criming, how will I get better at crime!?!

[-] F_OFF_Reddit@lemmy.world 21 points 21 hours ago

No amigo, it's not fair if you're profiting from it in the long run.

[-] kittenzrulz123 25 points 23 hours ago
[-] Professorozone@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago
[-] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 21 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

This is basically a veiled admission that OpenAI are falling behind in the very arms race they started. Good, fuck Altman. We need less ultra-corpo tech bro bullshit in prevailing technology.

[-] rainrain@sh.itjust.works 5 points 17 hours ago

To be fair copyright is a disease. But then so is billionaires, capitalism, business, etc.

I mean, if there's a war, and you shoot somebody, does that make you bad?

Yes and no.

[-] bruhssa@lemmy.world 12 points 21 hours ago

These fuckers are the first one to send tons of lawyers whenever you republish or use any IP of them. Fuck these idiots.

[-] wabafee@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

I think the answer is there just do what deepseek did.

[-] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I have conflicting feelings about this whole thing. If you are selling the result of training like OpenAI does (and every other company), then I feel like it’s absolutely and clearly not fair use. It’s just theft with extra steps.

On the other hand, what about open source projects and individuals who aren’t selling or competing with the owners of the training material? I feel like that would be fair use.

What keeps me up at night is if training is never fair use, then the natural result is that AI becomes monopolized by big companies with deep pockets who can pay for an infinite amount of random content licensing, and then we are all forever at their mercy for this entire branch of technology.

The practical, socioeconomic, and ethical considerations are really complex, but all I ever see discussed are these hard-line binary stances that would only have awful corporate-empowering consequences, either because they can steal content freely or because they are the only ones that will have the resources to control the technology.

[-] patrick@lemmy.bestiver.se 2 points 23 hours ago

Japan already passed a law that explicitly allows training on copyrighted material. And many other countries just wouldn’t care. So if it becomes a real problem the companies will just move.

I think they need to figure out a middle ground where we can extract value from the for profit AI companies but not actually restrict the competition.

[-] weremacaque@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Good. If I ever published anything, I would absolutely not want it to be pirated by AI so some asshole can plagiarize it later down the line and not even cite their sources.

[-] Tungsten5@lemm.ee 2 points 17 hours ago

I dont wanna be mean but I always thought this guy had a weird face

[-] BostonSamurai@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Oh no, not the plagiarizing machine! How are rich hacks going to feign talent now? Pay an artist for it?! Crazy!

[-] geography082@lemm.ee 36 points 1 day ago

Fuck these psychos. They should pay the copyright they stole with the billions they already made. Governments should protect people, MDF

[-] merdaverse@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago

TLDR: "we should be able to steal other people's work, or we'll go crying to daddy Trump. But DeepSeek shouldn't be able to steal from the stuff we stole, because China and open source"

[-] Rakonat@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

At the end of the day the fact that openai lost their collective shit when a Chinese company used their data and model to make their own more efficient model is all the proof I need they don't care about being fair or equitable when they get mad at people doing the exact thing they did and would aggressively oppose others using their own work to advance their own.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If giant megacorporations can benefit by ignoring copyright, us mortals should be able to as well.

Until then, you have the public domain to train on. If you don't want AI to talk like the 1920s, you shouldn't have extended copyright and robbed society of a robust public domain.

[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago

Either we can now have full authority to do anything we want with copyright, or the companies have to have to abide the same rules the plebs and serfs have to and only take from media a century ago, or stuff that fell through the cracks like Night of the Living Dead.

Copyright has always been a farce and a lie for the corporations, so it's nothing new that its "Do as I say, not as I do."

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 20 points 1 day ago

Sounds fair, shut it down.

[-] Daerun@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Why training openai with literally millions of copyrighted works is fair use, but me downloading an episode of a series not available in any platform means years of prison?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Do you promise?!?!

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Maybe as a consumer product but governments will still want it

[-] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 18 hours ago

Time to sail the high seas.

[-] faberyayo@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago

Fuck OpenAI for stealing the hard work of millions of people

[-] Ferroto@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Good. Fuck AI

[-] azalty@jlai.lu 9 points 1 day ago

To be fair, they’re not wrong. We need to find a legal comprise that satisfies everyone

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago

It's called paying for the content

[-] EnthusiasticNature94 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This.

I support AI, but I don't understand why AI bros are complicating things or making things all-or-nothing.

OpenAI had enough money to hire a hitman on one of their whistleblowers. They can afford to pay for content, lol.

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Why? Nothing they've shat out is good for anything anyway.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

But how will corporations like Disney survive without copywrites?! Won't someone think about the poor corporations?!

/s

[-] Montreal_Metro@lemmy.ca 46 points 1 day ago

If I had to pay tuition for education (buying text books, pay for classes and stuff), then you have to pay me to train your stupid AI using my materials.

[-] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Open can suck some dick.

[-] __UnicornPower__@lemmy.ca 38 points 1 day ago

As an artist, kindly get fucked ass hole. I'd like compensation for all the work of mine you stole.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] shaquilleoatmeal@lemm.ee 45 points 1 day ago

“The plagiarism machine will break without more things to plagiarize.”

[-] uis@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago

Vote pirate party.

[-] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 34 points 1 day ago

"How are we supposed to win the race if we can't cheat?!"

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Ferroto@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago
[-] psyspoop@lemm.ee 148 points 2 days ago

But I can't pirate copyrighted materials to "train" my own real intelligence.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
1186 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

66584 readers
4020 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS