566
submitted 11 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 136 points 11 months ago

They're shit cars. Let's please stop pretending they aren't. The build quality is abhorrent.

Yes, they had the cool factor for a while, and yes, I feel sorry for (some of) those who got caught up in something they didn't want to be caught up in. But also, the writing has been on the wall a long time, and build quality issues have been public knowledge for about as long.

You get what you pay for.

[-] ploot 122 points 11 months ago

You get what you pay for.

At $90K, no you most certainly don't.

[-] Elgenzay@lemmy.ml 28 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The majority of the cost is stupid tax

[-] ploot 11 points 11 months ago

Do you have a source for that?

Also we should note that Tesla paid $0 income tax on $2 billion income in 2024. And Trump axed the tax rebate to help people buy EVs.

[-] Elgenzay@lemmy.ml 26 points 11 months ago

Dumb tax as in tax for being dumb. I was joking.

I think "stupid tax" is the more common verbiage, I've updated it

[-] ploot 9 points 11 months ago

Ah, that makes sense. Sorry for the misunderstanding.

[-] TheRealKuni@midwest.social 6 points 11 months ago

Personally I think “idiot tax” works better.

“Stupid” and “dumb” being adjectives that could also be describing the tax itself, rather than the person paying it, is ambiguous. But “idiot tax” clearly says, to me anyway, “a tax on idiots.”

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 11 months ago

The phrase “idiot tax” is also used to describe people who buy lottery tickets.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

My buddy found blue painter’s tape where there was supposed to be wire conduit and screws when he lifted up the carpet on his. You may note that blue painter’s tape is intentionally designed to be temporary and dissolve away after a few weeks, which is much less than the expected lifespan of AN ENTIRE FUCKING CAR.

[-] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 131 points 11 months ago

Most likely bought with taxpayer money.

[-] tankfox@midwest.social 50 points 11 months ago

Pay? Why would he pay? Does he ever pay for anything?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 62 points 11 months ago
[-] Red_October@lemmy.world 55 points 11 months ago

Now he needs to drive around in it while we all absolutely pray for the funniest thing in the world to happen.

[-] SchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 11 months ago
[-] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

He isn't allowed to drive himself, but maybe FSD is a loophole?

[-] LMurch@thelemmy.club 50 points 11 months ago

It'll be auctioned off for $10M to an anonymous Saudi buyer.

[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Honestly, I'm not even mad they're squandering their money on stupid bullshit.

[-] Bob_Robertson_IX@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 11 months ago

Except it isn't stupid bullshit. They are giving the money to musk so that they can get something they want done. This also gives musk more power as he's able to buy more people.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] HorikBrun@kbin.earth 45 points 11 months ago

If this were a movie, (that I was writing) The car would glitch and lock Dumpster inside, then burst into flames. He would push the panic button, then look through the smoky windows at fElon laughing demonically, while Dumpster lights-outs coughing and railing against the betrayal, and injustice of it all.

Fade to black. Cough

[-] SilverCode@lemm.ee 21 points 11 months ago

Post credits scene will be fElon taking a seat behind the desk in the oval office.

[-] KingJalopy@lemm.ee 13 points 11 months ago

Which suddenly also burst into flames and cut to black almost immediately.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] supernicepojo@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

No seriously please get this script hammered out and get an animator

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago

Hearing Trump talk about how the car has 'computer' (during the news conference) made me think back to a news event with George H.W. Bush in a supermarket, seeing a grocery barcode scanner for the first time.

Same kind of inquisitive and excited response from both of them.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[-] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 22 points 11 months ago

Trump did a supermarket thing while out doing his disinformation circuit, and the owner guy was trying to explain things to him and you could tell Trump had never grocery shopped and then quickly lost interest and tuned the guy completely out.

The McDonald's fries thing was also amusing when he learned "how fries were made" and that they put them in a basket and not scoop them out by hand lol.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

The McDonald’s fries thing was also amusing when he learned “how fries were made” and that they put them in a basket and not scoop them out by hand lol.

They could have let him learn that the hard way, but no.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 11 months ago

Fucker Carlson shopping in Moscow can be put there too since he is another head of the MAGA hydra.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago

WoW tHeY iNvEnTeD sHoPpInG cArT rEtUrNs

[-] Minnels@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

Imagine if everyone in the world would just say "fuck no, I am not cooking for you" and the billionaires would die of starvation because they don't know how to do. Hilarious.

[-] booganiganie@lemmy.world 26 points 11 months ago

Like fuck he paid for it

[-] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 22 points 11 months ago

This car was probably bought using US government money.

[-] AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

I doubt if he paid for it, or if it'll ever be driven.

[-] KingJalopy@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

All good. It can totally drive itself.

[-] rslogix89@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

Tesla has a chance to do something funny here.

[-] sunset@reddthat.com 18 points 11 months ago
[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 11 months ago

Hold on.....this could be a good thing....

[-] Localhorst86@feddit.org 23 points 11 months ago

Hes not gonna drive it.

[-] Vertelleus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 11 months ago

And he doesn't even drive....

[-] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

doesn't even drive

It's more than that. Legally, he's not even allowed to drive.

Edit: might not be technically illegal, but disallowed by secret service.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MyDogLovesMe@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

Proving, once again, what complete fucking idiot he is!

[-] IHeartBadCode@fedia.io 11 points 11 months ago

What's weird is that Presidents aren't allowed to drive themselves. Secret service is no doubt impounding that new car until he's no longer their problem.

[-] JWBananas@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

They can, just not on public roads.

Biden drove an electric Ford truck on a closed lot.

Obama drove Jerry Seinfeld's car on the White House grounds.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] lupusblackfur@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

It'd be such a shame if it caught fire.

But then, Chump never drives anyway so....

🤷‍♂️ 🤷‍♂️

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 5 points 11 months ago

Will this be the car he now occupies in the motorcade?

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago

"Donald. I will pay to make you President but you have to give me access to all admin information and buy a car from me." E-Lawn.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
566 points (100.0% liked)

News

36233 readers
2348 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS