772
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 136 points 1 month ago

What could possibly go wrong when you give the most important job in the world to the most unqualified person ever?

[-] grue@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

We need to dispense with this notion that Trump is "unqualified." He is very qualified for the job that he actually set out to do, and has been accomplishing it expertly.

It's just a different job than the one you think it's supposed to be.

[-] treadful@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago

I don't believe that for one second. They've got a Project 2025 playbook written by some smarter people that makes them almost look competent. But they aren't even doing that great of a job of it. The whole lot appear to be as dumb as a box of rocks from my PoV.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

Consider the possibility that Trump's real goal is to destabilize the US, destroy its democracy and civil liberties, and turn it into a Russian-style oligarchy and vassal state of Russia.

Given that assumption, what mistake has he made that detracts from that goal?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Trump is overqualified to take us right into bankruptcy. He's been here so many times! Don't worry! Just ask for money from stupid people that have money!

[-] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Unironically, yes. You wanna know why Trump's businesses kept going bankrupt? Because they were never meant to be sustainable in the first place. They were scams -- probably fronts for Russian money laundering -- and designed to have all the money extracted and then implode on purpose before law enforcement could start looking too closely.

And now he's doing the same thing with the entire goddamn country.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

…twice.

We gave it to the most unqualified person ever… twice.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 79 points 1 month ago

Well . . yeah. He’s a demented rapist.

Who the fuck is just figuring this out?

[-] SnotFlickerman 35 points 1 month ago

A whole lot of people apparently.

[-] CowsLookLikeMaps@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The markets haven't historically had a problem with demented rapists in charge unless it effects shareholder value.

[-] psmgx@lemmy.world 69 points 1 month ago

Risk? Its his goal. Crash the market for his ultra wealthy amigos to buy up everything

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 18 points 1 month ago

We call that a Fire Sale for the Oligarchs.

[-] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

And...

Destroy USD.

Remove USD as global reserve currency.

Bitcoin.

Sell off land to billionaire buds.

(Allow) Nuke a few cities?. Big midterm surprise?. /q's Great solar flash of 2025 - this is the only one I'm not certain of what/how/when.

Voilà.

Lol. You downvote. Everything he does is a known. You just have to listen. Here's my comment from almost 4 months ago about tarrifs https://lemmy.ca/post/33768636/13042232

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Blackout@fedia.io 63 points 1 month ago

The upcoming Trumpageddon will make the Trumpcession look like Trumplemania.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] RagingSnarkasm@lemmy.world 55 points 1 month ago

Hey Wharton School: This is why you shouldn't sell degrees to rich parents for their spoiled children.

[-] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 43 points 1 month ago

I didn't think it was humanly possible to see such a concerted effort to destroy an economy in my life. Even Hitler didn't try to do this with Germany.

Once upon a time I couldn't get myself to watch old 80s and 90s cartoons anymore because I felt too old and cynical for them... but now I realize that the villains on those shows have nothing on Trump and his dipshit cronies. Only they are somehow more fleshed out despite being literal cartoon villains.

[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Even Hitler didn’t try to do this with Germany.

Hitler "fixed" Germany's economy by basically borrowing a bunch of money and then attempting to destroy the people who had loaned it to him (Jewish financiers were a large source of the borrowed money, as was the Soviet Union - a little-known but majorly important part of the Ribbentrop Pact and related German-Soviet agreements).

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

It might actually go the Hitler route. He's already made concentration camps for "illegal" human beings. It's only a matter of time until they figure out that they are deporting a practically free workforce with no rights.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 43 points 1 month ago

I love it!

Obamacare vs Trumpcession

Yet the Republicans will vote Trump next time around.

[-] null@slrpnk.net 25 points 1 month ago

vote Trump next time

The implication here is quite scary.

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Pun not intended. They got perfectly aged Trumps enough to continue up to 2100.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 37 points 1 month ago

I feel that it's looking fairly likely to be more of a Trumpression.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 month ago

This isn’t a trade war, it’s a Stupid Economic Operation.

Trump is just tracing from Pitin’s playbook.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Stern@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago

Imagine speedrunning your way into the great depression.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago

For billionaires it's a "buying opportunity" though.

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 9 points 1 month ago

Gotta take advantage of rock bottom prices!

[-] yarr@feddit.nl 25 points 1 month ago

Looks like Sleepy Don has done it again. What happened to better economy on Day 1? Is he going to say the days so far don't count? Let's hear some more excuses about how Biden made the job so hard you can't improve things by 1%. You only need to make excuses for a little less than 4 years now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 month ago

Please put his fucking name all over this shit.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Never let people forget who is the cause of all of this.

[-] QuarkVsOdo@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

If you are overall green now... sell.

He is going to make it worse.

[-] oppy1984@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago

Only if you need the funds short term, if you are a ways off from needing the funds then hold what you've got and start building a cash reserve to buy more shares when it's low.

[-] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 month ago

Time in market beats timing the market. You're never going to now when stocks are "low". You're just as likely to wait JUST a little too long and then end up buying when it's higher than it is now.

If you have AVAILABLE cash now, that isn't needed for an emergency fund, put it in the market now.

If you want to hedge your bets a bit, then just invest a smaller amount every week to distribute the buying power in case the market keeps dropping.

Trump could just announce that tariffs are dumb and he's never doing another one tonight, and the market jumps in off hours trading. Or the market could bounce up for a couple days then crash. Or the market could stay down for the next 4 years.

It's impossible to predict when the "buy back in" period should start, so just don't even try.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] bluewing@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

That's what most people don't get about investing-- there is money to be made in both market directions. The rich understand that.

[-] oppy1984@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

Yep, when I started investing about 20 years ago I read as much as I could, one thing that always stuck with me was a Warren Buffet quote "be fearful when others are greedy and to be greedy only when others are fearful".

That's generally how I approach investing in stock and Bitcoin. There are exceptions of course, but that's the general plan. This stock or whatever isn't failing, it's on sale.

[-] rocket_dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago

Wellllll, we're heading into completely uncharted territory here. No Warren Buffet wisdom has any relevance, because no one has dismantled the US government like this before. And we're only a month in. Extrapolate one month of damage over a 4-year term... we've experienced 2% of a Trump/Musk term.

Yeah I would absolutely recommend selling everything now, it's going to go much, MUCH lower. If you really want to play that game, wait until it's all hit rock fucking bottom to buy again.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] j_elgato@leminal.space 13 points 1 month ago

Republican administrations tank the economy when it's business as usual.

This is the dissolution and piecemeal sale of the US Government.

Of course there is going to be a fucking recession!

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm sure this would have been just as bad under Kamala.

/s (cannot believe I have to add this, but....)

[-] HalfSalesman@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Wait, you aren't serious... I read your post history lol. You need a /s

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Haha, of course I'm not serious, but a whole lot of bothsidering centrists and an unfortunate amount of leftists keep saying all this is the Democrats fault because they didn't offer them a pretty, pretty pony last fall.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Placebonickname@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Every day I wake up and I wonder if he’s a complete moron who’s in capable of doing his job… or is he making people worried about the recession and using these tariffs to manipulate the markets for his own benefit?

The other possibility people have told me about is that he’s doing it to distract us from the real activity behind the scenes, which is to make the rich much richer in the poor, more desperate… 

[-] outrageousmatter@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

No distractions, the second answer is not correct, he wants another glided age. The glided age is another term for the second industrial revolution that turned america into the superpower we know today, but It also was an awful era for your average american.They would work 12 hours or more for a whole week, some may have sunday off due to church but a lot did work that day with all your family working. The standard of living was so crap, many would become alcoholics due to the awful conditions, which would lead to prohibition movement. Your average american did not live long, many people would die due to work place accidents but due to no worker protection, nothing would change.

The era was also known for the monopolies, starting with rockfeller standard oil, carnegie steel company and morgans banking with many others. All the major monopolies worked together to prevent competition by buying out, they would ask nicely to sell your company to them, if not they would play the waiting game by lowering the product your selling to be unprofitable and then buy you out. Regulations did not exist yet so, this was all legal and if it wasn't, no one gave a shit as they were that powerful. The government was no help to them either, as most of them were bathing in the money of the 1%. The 1% lived in amazing conditions, and hoarded a ton of money, with some becoming important philanthropist.

Here is an article of proof of what trump wants, https://apnews.com/article/trump-tariffs-gilded-age-mckinley-grover-cleveland-1592dab80ad7159266db51b5baa774b6.

[-] miraclerandy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

I prefer the term ‘Trump Slump’ but as long as his name is attached, I’m good.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

I believe that's already a reference to his erectile dysfunction, but I could be wrong.

[-] HairyHarry@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago
[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

LOLOLOLOL

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-economy-business-voter-poll-b2668179.html

there was probably a time that i wouldn't have believed it would be possible for anyone to be as fucking stupid as any trump voter, but i don't remember it

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Thirty-three percent of Trump voters said, in their own words, they voted for him because of the “economy” or because “he is a good businessman,” a Washington Post-Schar School poll released Friday reveals.

This is from December. It's also a good sign because these are the people that are likely to turn on him as the prices increase and unemployment jumps.

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago

people that are likely to turn on him

i think you're underestimating just how brainwashed these people are. just the other day there was an article about a guy who lost his dream job in govt. because doge, and he STILL couldn't muster the gumption to say maybe trump was a fucking bad idea

https://lemmy.zip/post/33597934/17139253

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
772 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22959 readers
2830 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS