520
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Summary

Elon Musk’s DOGE faces mounting pressure to show achievements amid criticism. Staffers, under pressure from Trump administration officials, seek public relations wins to counter negative headlines.

Cuts to federal offices led to mass layoffs, and efforts to modernize government services have been chaotic. DOGE prioritizes speed over security and protecting sensitive information.

Trump has distanced himself, stating agency chiefs, not Musk, control department cuts, preferring a "scalpel" over a "hatchet" approach. Public opinion has turned against DOGE, with 48% disapproving versus 34% approving, according to a Washington Post-Ipsos poll.

With limited time before their tenure ends, DOGE officials are desperate to show results.

(page 2) 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Blackout@fedia.io 24 points 1 day ago

There's still time to die a hero Elon. All you have to do is commit hari-kari and I will build you a statue.

[-] ickplant@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Will the statue look like this?

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Will the statue be a dual flush model?

[-] Blackout@fedia.io 6 points 1 day ago

I will make sure it's very attractive to pigeons. It's what Elon would have wanted RIP

[-] sloppychops@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago

The fall-out between Trump and Musk is going to be explosive! And it will come. Sooner than we think, I'd guess.

If Canadian and European movie theatres want to boost attendance, they might want to think about screening the whole thing.

When Trump inevitably threatens to have him deported, it's going to be the comedy event of the year. Oscar worthy.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

This would make my year. I hope you’re right

[-] makyo@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

With limited time before their tenure ends, DOGE officials are desperate to show results.

Uh first I'm hearing of this

[-] twistypencil@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

What is this limited time thing?

[-] Hotspur@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 day ago

When they were selling DOGE during the campaign, the pitch was they’d have a year or something to do their thing. The EO might have it spelled out can’t recall. But they also said they would just be an advisory group? Not insider threat hackers and political commissars at the top of every agency. Not sure why they are sweating a time limit since they dont care about any other law, regulation or protocol. I guess if they don’t deliver enough, Trump won’t do another EO extending their presence? They’re literally reworking agency stuff so that the DOGE staff have to sign off on commissioners actions, hiring etc so are they just going to revert that once the clock strikes midnight for DOGE?

I suppose the idea is that the admin wants to lock in all the creepy shit from project 2025 prior to mid terms since they know that all of it will end up being wildly unpopular and will result in republican losses in congress and potentially gridlock from that point forward… but again, their playbook essentially calls for the end of democracy, so why are they sweating something like the midterms…

[-] ArghlBarghlFooFera@feddit.org 15 points 1 day ago

Next: Elon Musk will try to fake one and will pull a full on Eric-Cartman-style "screw you guys, I'm going home" when his incompetence is inevitably revealed..

I don't think it will even matter if it's fake. They keep talking about that $8 billion cut they made when it was immediately uncovered that it was actually $8 million. Like a week later they're still saying it was billions.

[-] cyphear@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

Seriously, Musk is fit... Fit for a short tour of the inside of a whicker basket.

[-] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 23 hours ago

Switch that to the wicker man, and I'm listening...

[-] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

They'll make something up. If they actually care about corruption, and I don't believe they do, that shit takes a lot of time to uncover. You need subject matter experts, forensic accountants and a bunch of lawyers, not a handful of 20 year old tech bros

[-] Billybob22@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago

Yes where are the weapons of mass corruption?

Maybe Saddam Husein can help?

Oh no they hung him!

[-] prole 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

oh no they hung him!

Hanged*

Sorry, not usually that person but this one drives me nuts because literally everyone gets it wrong, including TV, movies, news.

I guess at this point, it's gotten the "literally" treatment, and "hung" has become valid since it's used so much.

[-] Billybob22@feddit.uk 1 points 18 hours ago

Thank you, I am literate and opinionated but not educated 😀.

[-] roguelazer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Part of me wonders whether the whole thing is just a set up so Trump can look good for shutting them down...

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

No, that would require planning and forethought.

DOGE was always just an excuse to fire a bunch of government workers, cancel contracts (except for Musk), and run the government into the ground. If trump did fire Musk for overreach it would be afger the damage is done and trump will just proclaim mission accomplished.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

You’re giving too much forethought for a plan, but Trump thinks that way about everyone. He’s not just a bully but a toxic boss who always has someone lined up to be the fall guy.

The goal was always to fire a bunch of workers and replace them with sycophants: people actually trying to do their job inhibited the damage in trumps first term, so nope the priority is sycophants. Sycophants. everywhere. But every action needs a fall guy

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
520 points (100.0% liked)

politics

21568 readers
3935 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS