Follow up question should be: did they also reclassify 'extreme poverty'?
Poverty is defined as living in a household with consumption per capita below $2.15 per day.
They did not. Unless they forgot to account for inflation, but that would be a pretty glaring mistake to make.
Depends if that $2.15 was adjusted for inflation I guess.
I found this in the newsletter from Our World in Data and thought it was interesting to share here.
The researchers are from the University of San Diego. I shared the link above to the authors’ website because the university website is not opening for me.
The final version should be here, according to the newsletter and Google: https://econweb.ucsd.edu/~pniehaus/papers/how_poverty_fell.pdf
Not adjusted to inflation and modern wages
They actually did adjust for inflation.
We study poverty in the now-conventional sense of living on less than $2.15 per day in 2017 PPP dollars (World Bank, 2023), using both consumption- and income-based measures as available.
1 These rates are based on the $2.15 2017 PPP poverty line (Chen and Ravallion, 2010; World Bank, 2023). See https://pip.worldbank.org/
https://vincentarmentano.com/research/hpf/howpovertyfell.pdf (Bottom of 2nd page)
Optimists Unite
Optimists Unite Here
We are living in an age of unprecedented wealth, with millions entering the middle class every year. Homo sapiens live longer lifespans than ever before, with better nutrition, and better medicine than ever in our history. This is also the most peaceful time in our history, with record lows in crime and wars. The developing world is surging in wealth and in the west we have more opportunity and access to information than ever.
Positive Communities of Lemmy:
c/Wholesome@reddthat.com c/UpliftingNews@lemmy.world c/LemmyBeWholesome@lemmy.world c/MotivationalMemes@reddthat.com
We chose Reddthat specifically because no downvotes are allowed. Negative comments will be removed.