1082

Summary

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, Kamala Harris’ 2024 running mate, has suggested he may run for president in 2028.

Reflecting on the Democrats’ loss to Donald Trump and JD Vance, he admitted: “A large number of people did not believe we were fighting for them in the last election – and that’s the big disconnect.”

Walz said his life experience, rather than ambition, would guide his decision.

Though his VP campaign was marred by gaffes, he remains open to running if he feels prepared.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Stern@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

We know that female candidates with male VP's named Tim don't win against Republicans. Hillary and Kamala proved that. But this is wholly different, so its possible, concievable...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kalysta@lemm.ee 82 points 21 hours ago

Tim Walz unleashed would have won this.

He was hamstrug by Harris. He’s likely the dem’s best choice for 2028.

So of course they’ll run Newsome or Shapiro or Hillary Clinton again because they’re a bunch of idiots.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

Running Hillary again

The fact that this is somewhat believable is so stupid

[-] isaaclw@lemmy.world 33 points 21 hours ago

And Harris was hamstrung by Biden.

She could have been better.

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 27 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

She is a cop. She dropped out in 15th place in the 2020 primary before she was embarrassed in her home state of California. They should have never ran her and that's why they didn't do a primary.

[-] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

They did do a primary and Biden/Harris won. They had opposition even if you were unaware of it.

Edit: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries

It’s depressing how uninformed so many people are here of basic objective facts that are easily researched.

[-] McNasty@sh.itjust.works 6 points 13 hours ago

I'm not even sure how to respond to a lie that bold.

[-] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries

No one is lying here. You seem to forget Dean Phillips ran against Biden. There was a primary.

Why are some on this site so aggressive while being so poorly informed?

[-] PolydoreSmith@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Hey check out this hotshot over here with a long term memory! No, didn’t you hear she ran a perfect campaign they just couldn’t get enough celebrity endorsements…

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Some of us have a long enough memory to know that ozma's whole schtick has been shitting exclusively on Democrats for like the last year. He's not the guy you should look to for an unbiased opinion.

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

The one who kept warning for months that Biden would drop out, they'd put Harris in, and Trump would win again?

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

The one who got himself banned for explicitly saying all he wanted to do was post negative articles about Biden at an alarming rate.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Saleh@feddit.org 12 points 19 hours ago

Or she could have not played this game, that she willfully engaged in. Harris is the epitome of a career politician that rose through the ranks by doing what the party elites wanted her to do.

Once she was announced candidate, she had all the options to go for her own platform and grow a spine, if she has one. Also that is a quality that is crucial in a president, who wants to lead the supposedly most powerful country on earth.

And this shows, what the DNC wants. They dont want a strong leader. They want a puppet they can control. This is also why they were more than happy to have Biden go for another 4 years, not despite, but because of his declining mental state making him a great puppet.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] demizerone@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago

The Democratic Party is finished, just like the GOP.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Kcap@lemmy.world 18 points 18 hours ago

I'm feeling pretty certain the dems will run Buttigieg. Feels like they've been prepping him for a while.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] bradd@lemmy.world 19 points 18 hours ago
[-] OccultIconoclast@reddthat.com 39 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Walz was great in 2024. He had enthusiasm and actually answered the interviewers' questions. I would have preferred the symbolic victory of a black woman president, but I like Walz better as an individual person. I think he could have won if he'd been the presidential candidate. Well, Harris won too, but I mean he could have won even with the voter suppression stealing all those democratic votes.

President Walz and Vice President Cortez is the future we need. But probably not the future we'll get.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] drascus@sh.itjust.works 52 points 22 hours ago

Thinking there is going to be a real election in 2028 is the most optimistic thing I've heard in a while.

[-] astutemural@midwest.social 238 points 1 day ago

The Harris campaign had to cover the governor’s tracks when he tripped up during a California fundraiser by stating that the constitutionally-mandated system used to select the president, otherwise known as the electoral college, “needs to go”.

How the hell is that a gaffe? It's both the truth and exactly what people want to hear. Any lib who thinks like that needs to kindly keep their mouths shut for the next four years. This country needs radical change, the only choice you get is which one you want.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 271 points 1 day ago

I'm not convinced there will be an election in 2028...

load more comments (35 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
1082 points (100.0% liked)

politics

20616 readers
3375 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS