1085

Summary

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, Kamala Harris’ 2024 running mate, has suggested he may run for president in 2028.

Reflecting on the Democrats’ loss to Donald Trump and JD Vance, he admitted: “A large number of people did not believe we were fighting for them in the last election – and that’s the big disconnect.”

Walz said his life experience, rather than ambition, would guide his decision.

Though his VP campaign was marred by gaffes, he remains open to running if he feels prepared.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Kalysta@lemm.ee 82 points 21 hours ago

Tim Walz unleashed would have won this.

He was hamstrug by Harris. He’s likely the dem’s best choice for 2028.

So of course they’ll run Newsome or Shapiro or Hillary Clinton again because they’re a bunch of idiots.

[-] littlewonder@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I saw a video of him sitting down to have an earnest conversation with hardcore Trump farmers and they left liking him a lot. He's got that "common sense" Midwestern energy on lock and I can see him gaining a lot of ground with the blue collar and rural folks because of it.

If he has pro-hunting gun views like Bernie, he'll be an amazing pick.

[-] Kalysta@lemm.ee 4 points 9 hours ago

I think he hunts himself. Didn’t he say that during the campaign with Harris?

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

Running Hillary again

The fact that this is somewhat believable is so stupid

[-] isaaclw@lemmy.world 33 points 21 hours ago

And Harris was hamstrung by Biden.

She could have been better.

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 28 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

She is a cop. She dropped out in 15th place in the 2020 primary before she was embarrassed in her home state of California. They should have never ran her and that's why they didn't do a primary.

[-] prole 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Prosecutors are not cops.

I'm curious how you picture a society functioning without prosecutors. Please enlighten me.

Shit like this is why people don't take the "defund the police" movement seriously.

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago
[-] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

They did do a primary and Biden/Harris won. They had opposition even if you were unaware of it.

Edit: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries

It’s depressing how uninformed so many people are here of basic objective facts that are easily researched.

[-] McNasty@sh.itjust.works 7 points 13 hours ago

I'm not even sure how to respond to a lie that bold.

[-] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 2 points 12 hours ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries

No one is lying here. You seem to forget Dean Phillips ran against Biden. There was a primary.

Why are some on this site so aggressive while being so poorly informed?

[-] PolydoreSmith@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Hey check out this hotshot over here with a long term memory! No, didn’t you hear she ran a perfect campaign they just couldn’t get enough celebrity endorsements…

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Some of us have a long enough memory to know that ozma's whole schtick has been shitting exclusively on Democrats for like the last year. He's not the guy you should look to for an unbiased opinion.

[-] Iceman@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

But they're right. Harris did drop out of the primaries before they even started and she was unpopular in the polls the entire time.

She would in all likely hood not be on the ticket if it wasn't for Bidens stubborn pride.

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

The one who kept warning for months that Biden would drop out, they'd put Harris in, and Trump would win again?

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

The one who got himself banned for explicitly saying all he wanted to do was post negative articles about Biden at an alarming rate.

[-] Saleh@feddit.org 12 points 19 hours ago

Or she could have not played this game, that she willfully engaged in. Harris is the epitome of a career politician that rose through the ranks by doing what the party elites wanted her to do.

Once she was announced candidate, she had all the options to go for her own platform and grow a spine, if she has one. Also that is a quality that is crucial in a president, who wants to lead the supposedly most powerful country on earth.

And this shows, what the DNC wants. They dont want a strong leader. They want a puppet they can control. This is also why they were more than happy to have Biden go for another 4 years, not despite, but because of his declining mental state making him a great puppet.

Imagine the timeline where Joe got assassinated before the primaries. We wouldn't have this bullshit timeline.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 14 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Yeah, they would have blamed all the inflation on our first woman president and used it to denounce women for another half a century. If she helped Israel she would have been called out for Genocide just the same. If she didn't she would have been called weak and emotional, unfit to be president.

Really it was a no win situation for her.

Edit: Fairly sure instead of Genocide Joe they would have called her Obamala Kamala.

[-] demizerone@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago

The Democratic Party is finished, just like the GOP.

[-] BigBenis@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

Pretty much any reasonable person unleashed by the Democratic party would have won.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago

Yep. I remember a time when the Beltway insiders were acting like Amy Klobuchar was a rising star or some such, LOL.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago

Ah, Klobuchar. She is the prize senator from the DFL-- their only Sr Senator. She more or less runs it. The same Klobachar who threw out every single police misconduct case given to her when she was a county prosecutor, including the murder of George Floyd by officer Derek Chauvin. She just let him walk because he was a cop.

this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
1085 points (100.0% liked)

politics

20616 readers
3375 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS