610

Summary

Protests erupted across the U.S. in response to Donald Trump and JD Vance’s Oval Office bullying of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

Demonstrators gathered in cities like New York, Los Angeles, and Boston, waving Ukrainian flags and demanding continued U.S. support for Ukraine.

In Vermont, protesters disrupted Vance’s ski trip, criticizing his stance. Many labeled the White House meeting an “ambush” and condemned Trump’s ultimatum to Ukraine.

The protests reflected growing public frustration over the administration’s shifting stance on the Russia-Ukraine war.

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] meowmeowbeanz@sopuli.xyz 80 points 1 day ago

Trump's 'America First' now looks more like 'America Alone'—a gift to Moscow.

🐱🐱

[-] ItsJannnneee 7 points 19 hours ago

He's never cared about America. It's always been about power and sucking up to dictators.

[-] uienia@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Well they are not alone, as you said they got Russia.

[-] Revan343@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago

I gotta say, I did not have "America becomes Russian vassal state" on my bingo card

[-] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

Should have been your free square.

[-] Revan343@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

My free square just says "Trump". Which I suppose is kind of the same thing

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago

Wonder why one war was more important than the other in 2024...

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago

It was crazy to see waves of cops converging on Gaza protesters while college admins are dragged up in front of Congress to be harangued for allowing ISIS to infiltrate their campuses.

I wonder if we'll see Ukrainian protesters get the same treatment.

[-] Noobnarski@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

The russians do not have the same amount of lobbying in the whole country that the israelis do, at least not yet.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I don't know why enabling netanyahu's genocide was a greater priority for the biden administration than Ukraine ever was. Or indeed, anything else for the entirety of his term.

[-] absentbird@lemm.ee 3 points 6 hours ago

Biden gave Ukraine $120 billion for defense against the invasion.

He gave $18 billion to Israel and $2 billion to Gaza.

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

Wow, still harping on Biden. I guess the rubles are still flowing, eh comrade?

[-] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

I mean they still have a point.

Claiming Israel doing it is fine while helping Ukraine was a really wild thing to do.

Though I still don't understand why anyone thought Trump would do anything to stop Israel either.

[-] absentbird@lemm.ee 1 points 6 hours ago

I don't think anyone claimed what Israel is doing was fine. Even Biden was critical.

When Ukraine surrendered their nuclear weapons the US promised to help protect them from Russia. It was our duty to help. To get the Ukraine funding passed it had to be bundled with assistance for Israel, or Republicans would not have voted for it.

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

Helping Israel is messed up, but there's probably only a handful of politicians who tried to stop it. Before Trump, it seemed like everyone supported Ukraine. It's such a drastic change in the political climate that blaming Biden for everything Israel is a gross oversimplification and shifting of the blame that rightfully belongs on most of our government.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Before Trump, it seemed like everyone supported Ukraine.

Polling-wise, people weren't much more enthusiastic about sending support to Kyiv than Tel-Aviv. These were both grisly foreign conflicts cheerleaded from the press that had very little purchase in mainstream American circles. If anything, it was Israel that had more universal support, as conservatives had far more opposition to Ukraine aid than liberals had to Israeli aid.

Partisan infighting made matters worse, of course. Liberal news tried to make the American side of these conflicts look "Woke" in order to justify the violence. Both the IDF and the Azov Battalions were apparently fighting for LGBTQ rights in their respective territories, I guess? The conservative response on this was split the partisan reaction. Republicans declared that, aktuly, no by fighting Muslims the IDF was Based Trad and therefore good. Meanwhile, they accepted the Woke Ukrainians narrative uncritically and decided this meant Russia must have been the good guys. Add in how pro-Gaza protests were from the stupid hippie university students and their liberal arts (re: foreign language / poli-sci / international studies) professorships with a certain Black Lives Matter vibe to the opposition, and Republicans double-extra hated them.

But any conversation about these wars was so awash in domestic propaganda and spin. Support was always predicated on whether you though Zelenskyy or Netanyahu was an MSNBC Liberal or a FOX News Conservative. The local politics of these conflicts - ideas of national sovereignty versus international security, international relations around control of minerals and agricultural goods, civil rights for local minority groups - was never a serious part of the conversation.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago

Oh honey, find a new song.

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

People are so easily manipulated into supporting war.

[-] mohammed_alibi@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Ask yourself who the fuck started the war... And on whose land is Russian military on?

I don't support war. I support Russia getting the fuck out of Ukraine. And if that requires force, then I support it. Russia can leave immediately if they want.

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 2 points 20 hours ago
[-] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago

If Russia just stopped invading a sovereign nation, there would be no war.

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 hours ago

If the US dissolved NATO there would be no war

[-] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

And there'd be no Europe.

[-] MellowYellow13@lemmy.world 15 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)
[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 hours ago

Russia may have fired the first bullet, but the US started it

[-] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)
[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 hours ago

It's remarkable how many people can't read rules around here specifically rule number 3

[-] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)
[-] uienia@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago

Yes, the support for Putins war is definitely a very bizarre thing.

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 70 points 1 day ago

Not supporting war, supporting winning - as opposed to losing. Support for war is irrelevant once the invasion begins.

The US can't stop the war. Ukraine can't even stop the war. The Ukrainian government could just give up, but then the occupation begins, and that's the hard part. The people of Ukraine aren't going to just roll over and play nice while Russia dismantles their society. They will fight back, and it will be bloodier for both sides than the clash of armies was.

Anyways, that's way more of an answer than your dumb ass comment deserves.

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

This coming from the same people that whitewashed the entire Bush administration...

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 11 points 19 hours ago

The best as hominem you can come up with is just a wild guess that I belong to a group that I don't?

[-] MellowYellow13@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

Nice argument.

[-] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 day ago

You, for example.

[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 day ago
[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

Who is supporting it?

[-] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

I know. They all are great poets defending concepts, but so few soldiers fighting for actual people.

this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
610 points (100.0% liked)

politics

20563 readers
3441 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS