812

“Trumpism is not going to be defeated by inside-the-Beltway politicians,” he said.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 161 points 4 months ago

People like AOC and Sanders that are going around to different states and online, explaining to people how to stand up and resist, how to say: "this is not normal, but it is also not the time to feel helpless and defeated", should be emulated by the entire Democratic party.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 86 points 4 months ago

AOC is definitely doing what you've said. But while some of what Sanders is doing is that, I think the important difference is that he's actually going around to people who have historically disagreed with him and saying, "This is how the people you voted for are betraying that vote. We need to work together to stop them." We need both from the DNC, especially depending on their constituents.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 16 points 4 months ago

But I was told that the Harris campaign trying to court traditionally Republican voters was a mistake.

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 79 points 4 months ago

I get your /s, but bruh. Harris going on tour with the Cheneys was a terrible mistake. Bernie holding rallies and town halls in poor red districts and explaining to people how the richest man in the world bought the presidency to literally rob them of what little they have, not a mistake. There is a huge difference between the two.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 38 points 4 months ago

But I was told that the Harris campaign trying to court traditionally Republican voters was a mistake.

Courting by trying to be republican lite instead of courting them with alternatives.

[-] TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

^^^this. All of it.

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago

There is a difference between explaining how someone is getting screwed and saying you'll fight with them against getting screwed and saying you're a more friendly version of the person that's about to screw you.

[-] djsoren19 12 points 4 months ago

because Harris tried to court them by doubling down on xenophobia, transphobia and a genocide, instead of trying to unite them with the fact that our true enemy has always been the corporate billionaires who own our politicians. There's an obvious reason why the Harris campaign didn't go with that message, which I leave as an exercise for the reader.

Trump voters, more or less, face the same economic issues we do. They just don't understand them, and they don't understand why voting for fascism isn't going to fix those issues. Trying to get them to understand is an excellent and admirable goal. I'm not certain Bernie will succeed, nor do I have the patience to support him in this endeavor any more, but I wish him luck. I also don't think it will matter anymore, as Republicans have already said they're ignoring their constituency, and I don't think we'll have fair and free elections ever again.

[-] bss03@infosec.pub 7 points 4 months ago

It was. They didn't hold their base. Also, they decided to "court" the intolerant, even tho there might be some tolerant, but traditionally Republican, voters.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Harris: "I'm just like you! I own guns, and I'm scared of all the same things you are. See? I'm on the same side as people leftists hate!"

Leftists: "...wait what?"

Bernie: "Look, we probably disagree on a lot of things. And we're probably never going to agree on them. But Trump is going to get you hurt, and I want to help even if you'll never vote for me."

Now, what are the softer conservatives (non-MAGAs) going to say in response to that? Obviously it remains to be seen; maybe a lot, maybe not much yet. But I bet it'll help someday.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 74 points 4 months ago

Bernie is a great speaker. He’s very direct and speaks plainly. It’s effective.

[-] blakenong@lemmings.world 12 points 4 months ago

I love Bernie, but he isn’t effective… hopefully this time he will be, but I don’t see anything he says being shared online

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

You're seeing it right now. That's what we're doing here

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 52 points 4 months ago

Could have had two terms of this guy now

[-] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 4 months ago

Two terms with him not looking for a 3rd...

[-] Breezy@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Or he wouldve been so wonderful, the people pushed to have him for a third. Roosevelt stayed in so long so we're not opposed to keeping someone for more then two terms.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 4 months ago

True but he's also the reason for the rule.

[-] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 37 points 4 months ago

Bernie is right; politics needs to focus on the socioeconomic ("tangible") difference for the people. Generating income for the people is what's important.

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

He gives us focus on a problem so we can focus on the solutions. This is what populism is supposed to be, someone uniting us under one call to action, one message, and we all link arms and say with one voice that we want a better world.

The problem: wealthy robber-barons have taken over the country and rampant capitalism is undermining literally everything about our society and won't rest until there's nothing left to extract from a population.

The solution: https://guillotine.dk/pages/drawings1792.html

edit: the single, stinging downvote reminded me that even mocking threats against our oppressors isn't "civil" and that if we really want to actually benefit from the wealth we generate for others, we should just sit down, shut up and appreciate the fact that literally everything is going to be a paid-subscription model designed to make sure you don't keep a dime of your own work and effort. I promise I will be a better servant for the landowners and just work the fields like a good serf.

[-] Crikeste@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

Didn’t Trump win because of “the price of eggs”? Seems to me that people are struggling and voting for whatever they think may help them, so there is probably a huge group of people who could be swayed by Bernie, right? One can hope lol

[-] TheGoddessAnoia@lemmy.ca 25 points 4 months ago

My, my! It's good to see so many younger Americans ripping on an 83 year old man who has lived his socialist beliefs since high school, regardless of cost. Bernie has been outvoted, dragged, beaten, arrested, and then gone right back out to the front lines and done it all again: what, pray, are you doing , now, when it is needed, to compare? Aside, I mean, from waving your keyboard at the big, bad socialist who is at least still out there trying to push the stone up the hill once more, because it's what he can still do?

I thought the fascists were the problem.

[-] Breezy@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Someone needs to take a page outta VP trumps book and start dog shitting on how bad hes making it for the every day person. Direct the hate those people have to the ones fucking us all and a revolution will happen. Itll be an uphill battle for sure, but the big trumpers are small minded and once they are negatively affected and are given a new target, they'll jump at it if you can convince them they'll benefit.

Edit: forgot the word 'it', oops.

[-] Breezy@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

There needs to be a voice organizing this! Bernie would be great, however i dont think he has it in him to be like that. Thats why AOC (Alexandria Ocasio Cortez) needs to become a firebrand and galvanize any forward thinking person to push for change and not to accept anything less than better.

No more lesser of the two evils. We need to become better than we are.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ramble81@lemm.ee 20 points 4 months ago

We really need to start developing ways to primary the hell out of any of the democrats in Washington who continue to do nothing, or rather who are actively being passive because all they care about is the rich donor money. If they started feeling the heat from the chance they could lose their position to a challenger they’d start to change their tune.

[-] tastysaganaki@reddthat.com 20 points 4 months ago

There’s some people who just hate on Bernie regardless of what he says or does. He if makes no comment in this time of authoritarianism, you’ll say he’s useless. If he does speeches like he’s doing, you’ll say he’s useless- as many comments here currently reflect. He typically says things that have a moral core or decency to them. He’s of course not perfect. He also has to politically function within a broken two party bullshit system which, unless there’s a significant change to how it functions, limits how he can try to enact laws. But to many here he’s clearly damned if he does and doesn’t. I’ve read through all of the comments here so far and none of the people critiquing Bernie have offered up a tangible suggestion for what Bernie should be doing instead, rather just pointing out how ineffective they feel Bernie is. Bernie made a huge national culture shift to the left through his historic runs for president. He was stifled by the DNC and ultimately lost, but the enduring left of center message continues in many politicians running in the country on the Democratic side. I am not defending the Democrats as a party at all, but I’d argue Bernie successfully used the Dems to get his message across during his presidential runs, and now as an Independent continues to have a platform for left of center messages. Whether he’s sufficiently left enough or effective enough is the eternally tired debate with some on the left who, besides shitting on Bernie, don’t themselves offer solutions.

[-] Spzi@lemm.ee 10 points 4 months ago

none of the people critiquing Bernie have offered up a tangible suggestion for what Bernie should be doing instead, rather just pointing out how ineffective they feel Bernie is.

People reacting to activism, in a nutshell.

[-] JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Defense mechanism

That way they feel less bad about doing nothing themselves

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

I heard them described as 'Limp Dick Democrats' today.

And that's pretty fitting.

[-] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 months ago

Some are getting enthusiastic, but if you look at the past decades: one realizes that it’s the same small group/ type of people being motivated and excited again and again, with zero effect seen years later.

The federal government and many states are not democracies; any strategy that assumes this will not work. Any movement that will not fix bad voting systems will fail.

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Some are getting enthusiastic, but if you look at the past decades: one realizes that it’s the same small group/ type of people being motivated and excited again and again, with zero effect seen years later.

Big changes that become extremely popular and supported by the public and are largely looked back on by future generations as positive or even necessary are often instigated and initiated by small groups of passionate people who are genuine in their desire for a better world.

Do not underestimate the power of small groups of passionate people who want to make the world a better kinder place. You can't bribe these people, you can't distract these people, you can't silence these people, you have to jail and kill every single last one to stop them from agitating the shit out of the general population to get normal people to fight for better treatment for themselves and others. Every single one of these people is from the perspective of an authoritarian dictator a nightmare to deal with since like a catastrophically deadly virus, it only takes one of these people spreading the contagion uncontrolled and unnoticed to tear the body apart.

The federal government and many states are not democracies; any strategy that assumes this will not work. Any movement that will not fix bad voting systems will fail.

Agreed, I don't mean to downplay the gravity of this situation, but on the other hand I think many people are comfortably past the point of needing to hold on to the structures that define the status quo. Government does not exist once the majority of people stop believing in it a basic level. Violence and control still exist, and they yet may win the day, but no matter what happens in the realm of physical bodies struggling against other physical bodies in the realm of ideas they have already lost and that means that no arrangement of threats or violent systems of control will truly ever be stable.

I take hope in that.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] punkisundead@slrpnk.net 10 points 4 months ago

Thats because he is an antifascists while most Democrats are not.

[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

It is good to see Bernie out there active. The only issue is where does this all go? Harris lost and no leadership changes has been made. Dems are actively throwing their hands up saying they can't do anything.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago

Bernie lines up all the people who thought of leaving the Democrats and prevents them from organizing around an alternative.

Then when the next election comes Bernie tells them to unconditionally vote Democrat because they have no other choice.

Pied Piper Sanders.

[-] isles@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

The only issue is where does this all go?

I can only hope to people not looking to the DNC for answers and we break their duopoly with some sort of working class / labor party.

[-] Tezzerets_Tea_Time@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Most of them are totally fine with most everything that's happening. They have all the tools to keep their stock portfolios stacked, they never cared about poors, and they get to campaign on "omg look how awful." They're gonna whine performatively and not do a damn thing to actually stop a single thing. If they had half a collective spine and a fractuon the moral fortitude Bernie does, we never would have gotten here to begin with.

[-] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Bernie has been mobilized to do what he always does: re-direct activist energy into the Democratic Party so they can snuff it out (and bring in donations).

He is actively working against progress, while pretending to work for it.

[-] EndRedStateSubsidies@leminal.space 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

This dude is 100% right.

It may not be why Bernie does it but it's why they allow him to exist. He is a pressure release valve so people angry enough to do something can follow him instead of Luigi.

Then, when the primaries are rigged against him the DNC leadership can say look, you lost fair and square! voters don't want progress and continue serving the rich.

Meanwhile, liberals, progressives, leftists, and everything not pro fascists blame each other for losing an election that was stolen.

https://electiontruthalliance.org/clark-county%2C-nv

https://www.kkoh.com/2025/01/21/nv-sos-launches-investigations-into-election-fraud/

Around 3/4ths of theft in this country is wage theft by corporations that will never be punished. They steal trillions from us while we would be jailed for a loaf of bread in some jurisdictions.

Inflation paired with wage suppression is class warfare in a battle of attrition. Liberals that refuse to raise taxes on corporations or wages for workers just legitimize exploitation.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 4 months ago

Ascribing malice to Bernie is a very dubious (read: wrong) claim, but unfortunately in terms of results that's basically what's happening. Working within the two-party system is never going to produce material results.

[-] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago

the problem with ascribing ignorance over malice is that for all intents and purposes when it comes to politics, the effects are still the same

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

well that is Bernie's role.
Act the part full of piss and vinegar and eventually tell you to vote for the fimal corporate dem.

[-] Crikeste@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago

Don’t get mad at Bernie because the people won’t act. He can say the most correct, moral and ethical things imaginable; it doesn’t mean shit until people stand up and fight for it.

And since we’re considering roles, what’s yours? To piss on any and every semblance of progress because it doesn’t meet your exact moral criteria? lol

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Bernie did not have to capitulate. But he did.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
812 points (100.0% liked)

Progressive Politics

2922 readers
1514 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS