477
submitted 17 hours ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Summary

Former federal prosecutor Sara Levine, fired by Trump, warned on 60 Minutes that the Justice Department is "under attack."

Levine, who prosecuted January 6 rioters, said she was fired for upholding the law.

Legal expert Peter Keisler criticized Trump's pardons of Capitol rioters, arguing they signal that crimes committed in support of Trump's agenda may go unpunished.

These actions undermine the rule of law and discouraging accountability for political violence.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 hours ago

In no universe would a Democrat President even be allowed to joke about the things that Trump is doing in plain sight.

How long are you guys going to wait until doing something?

[-] rational_lib@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

We did something already. It didn't work.

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 hours ago

When idiots vote for a felon, they should expect that felon to destroy the system that might hold him accountable some day.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 15 points 5 hours ago

I've been terrified since early November

[-] choco_crispies@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago
[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 19 points 6 hours ago

The terrifying part happened at the election.

This was the expected part.

The next terrifying part is that we might not kick them out.

[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

The DOJ has been under attack since Jan 2018.

[-] Placebonickname@lemmy.world 68 points 15 hours ago

I need more than Half the states to declare that Trump is a national emergency, and then set legislation to limit all Federal Authority in state level Justice Matters AND mark federal government actions, laws, and executive orders as null/void or something like that. We have to take power away from the Federal Government if it can’t be checked and balanced.

[-] KinglyWeevil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 9 hours ago

That path is dangerous, too. It's currently what's allowing states to deny abortions and I bet it would eventually be used to re-legalize slavery.

[-] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 105 points 17 hours ago

Legal expert Peter Keisler criticized Trump's pardons of Capitol rioters, arguing they signal that crimes committed in support of Trump's agenda may go unpunished.

Um, isn't that the main point why Trump did it?

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 66 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

It's like the entire liberal world has been conditioned to act like the things that are very obviously happening may happen ... not right now though ... at some future unknown date ... so you don't need to worry about it really. Don't rock the boat and certainly don't miss work tomorrow... just continue consuming and hold tight while someone else presumably sorts it out.

It's like a civilization-wide bystander effect.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 35 points 15 hours ago

Always have been:

I must make two honest confessions to you, my Christian and Jewish brothers. First, I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 21 points 15 hours ago

This is what pisses me off about all the people who kept talking about how the Democrats were failing to get voters engaged in 2024.

If the Dems weren't doing the job, what was keeping you from stepping up?

Its like there was a fire going on and people were complaining the firemen weren't doing enough instead of jumping in and helping.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 17 points 15 hours ago

The Harris campaign spent a billion and a half dollars on "getting voters engaged" and she still lost anyway. All the phone-banking and door-knocking in the world can't overcome the fundamental problem of refusing to adopt policies the people actually want!

So please, explain to me exactly what the fuck kind of "stepping up" you expect randos from the Internet, who had no ability to affect the campaign's platform, to actually fucking do?!

[-] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 hours ago

Idk, maybe voting against the dude who straight up said he would be a dictator and you'd never vote again?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 hours ago

My analogy is that it was like someone threw a molotov cocktail through your window, but you let the house burn down because the window didn't stop the bottle.

[-] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago

That'll teach that window.

[-] WagyuSneakers@lemmy.world 11 points 14 hours ago

I'm not a politician. I developed an entirely different set of skills. Throwing away my career at the potential of reskilling is absurd.

And Dems weren't doing their job. I'm tired of people pretending like that's acceptable. I canvass. I get people ready to vote. I do my part.

I can't even tell you the last time a Dem policy benefitted me directly. What I have in common with them really just boils down to them being the only opposition right now. I pushed Harris like we had to and I'll never forgive them for running such an unlovable candidate. They knew what they were doing. The second there's another serious option I'm gone. Dems complete lack of opposition makes them complicit in everything that's happening.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 6 points 12 hours ago

AOC and Omar have entered the chat.

If you don't like the Dems that are in power now, you can primary them. If we get another election.

[-] WagyuSneakers@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

We haven't had a real primary in a long time.

AOC is a joke. I will actually not support that in any way. Dems are just as capable for what's happening. They're actively complicit.

[-] CMonster@discuss.online 1 points 8 hours ago

How long until the dems have effective leadership putting people like AOC and Omar in the spotlight and building around them rather than keeping them on the fringes?

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 2 points 7 hours ago

Gee, almost as if you should be out there helping folks win the next set of primaries.

[-] emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 11 hours ago

Lmao if you get a primary. Trump wasnt the one who took that away from you last time, and he wasnt the one who screwed over bernie before that. Good job pointing to the two token progressives as if that doesnt prove the other guy's point.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 4 points 8 hours ago

Keep saying both sides are the same enough, maybe you can convince yourself.

[-] emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 8 hours ago

Thats literally not what im saying. Im saying you all should have demanded the democrats be better, not just pledged your undying devotion because they arent as bad. But keep blaming everyone except the politicians who fucked you, thats turning out great.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 3 points 7 hours ago

What is your actual plan?

I know the Dem I want to run against the current GOP Congressperson in 2026.

What are you planning on doing? Going to get a 3rd Party up and running in 24 months?

[-] emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 hours ago

No, probably not unfortunately. But if you had all listened to the people sounding the alarm about the democrats years ago that might have worked. If you all hadnt spend so much energy attacking undecided and pro palestine voters a year before the election even happened, and instead directed some of that energy into pressuring the democratic party, whoch was what the whole undecided movement was about, then maybe the democrats would have changed direction and not shifted so much further right and lost the election because of it. Your constant apologetics for terrible party leadership is causing you to lose any small influence you may have had. But also yes, its probably worth getting a 3rd party going at this point even if they aren't immediately viable, because you'll never see meaningful change otherwise.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 5 hours ago

So, you don't have a plan or any idea of what to do besides try and get good Dems elected?

But yes, let's keep harping on the past instead of moving forward, because not doing anything always works.

[-] djsoren19 13 points 15 hours ago

Probably the part where I didn't receive over a billion dollars in donations to actually get media attention. A lot of people have been campaigning to get people to ditch the Democrats because they're controlled corporate stooges for the last few decades, I think you were shouting at them for supporting third parties at the time.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 6 points 12 hours ago

Read up on how Hitler took power in the first place.

A lot of people hated him, but they hated other politicians more and decided that letting him have a go at it wouldn't be a bad thing.

If you thought a third party was going to come to the rescue in 2024 you have my abject sympathy.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Soulg@ani.social 9 points 15 hours ago

And they should have been shouted at. The current system does not allow for third party viability as disappointing as that is.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 15 points 16 hours ago

Someone's gonna be killed by one of these J6 yoyos. Could be a SC justice after a ruling that goes against Trump, could be one of those key people from the last administration that Trump quite openly dropped security details for.

Will Trump go the extra mile and pardon them? Will his party full of Christian Conservatives ignore their God's commandment "Thou Shall Not Kill" when the victim is a political opponent who they don't like? Of course they will.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 13 points 16 hours ago

At least three of them have already been re-arrested for other crimes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] alykanas@slrpnk.net 18 points 16 hours ago

Lots of warnings and recommendations to be scared.

Very few saying what to do.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 6 points 10 hours ago

The clear thing was "vote for Harris". It was just that a lot of people wanted to punish Democrats for the Palestinian genocide.

[-] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago

That was only clear to those who think the USA is a working democracy, where the purple states have fair elections. It was clear to idealists or uninformed.

To those who understand why computer ballots should not be used, or just plain cynical, it was clear the choice was out of our hands

[-] coaxil@lemm.ee 6 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

As someone watching in from another country, you guys really need to do a violence about now IMHO, its the only action left that will do anything

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 21 points 16 hours ago

The only way to take on a bully is to bloody his nose.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
477 points (100.0% liked)

politics

20416 readers
2811 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS