371
submitted 1 month ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 77 points 1 month ago

A KGB rep already said Trump has "obligations" he needs to fulfill.

[-] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

Just to play devils advocate, they do this to ‘stir the pot.’ Granted, Putin’s hand is up Trump’s ass to the shoulder.

[-] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 1 month ago

He also had to pay a lot of money he didn't have and then suddenly did.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 66 points 1 month ago

Not that much of a mystery, really. Putin has had Donnie's nuts in a vise since the 80s.

[-] enbee 52 points 1 month ago

https://web.archive.org/web/20250221155926/https://www.thedailybeast.com/former-intelligence-officer-alnur-mussayev-claims-kgb-recruited-donald-trump-under-codename-krasnov//

Once again, for the cheap seats - the US lost the third world war which was waged in the shadows and online. China and Russia installed this fucking nutter both times. Biden won in 2020 because enough folks got off their asses to vote, but the disinformation and propaganda run during Bidens term led to less asses going to the polls. Musk didn’t buy twitter and hollow it out for nyucks. He was directed to do so by China, Russia, and the UAE. Look at the public filings for his purchase. Look at who gave Musk the money for that purchase. Twitter was such a powerful tool to spread or combat disinformation and propaganda, so it was purchased and gutted in order to be used the another nail in the coffin of progressive collective action. Twitter under musk was such a huge part of drumpf 2024 winning.

[-] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

To be honest and a bit pedantic, it's a continuation of the cold war. There has been no 3rd world war and likely as not due to; Russia's complete mishandling of their nuclear arsenal and China's economic interests, there is little threat of one. The US intelligence departments know this. And with Gabbard as the DNI Chief I'm pretty sure Russia has a finger on the pulse of what we will know. There are rumblings of compartmentalization efforts in the Intelligence communities and there are rumors of rogue efforts to keep sensitive intel within the DOD and subsequent cells and away from the DNI and the Executive branch. We're living in absolutely insane times and the US Hegemony is at it's most vulnerable now. I am not for US Hegemony in the general sense and I do not think that it is the only stabilizing force in world politics. But when a power vacuum forms, it's rare that stability follows in the short term.

If there were ever a time for a general strike to depose and defang the executive branch it is now. However, I don't see the general US populace doing anything on behalf of Ukraine or to further the Hegemony.

With what Musk is allowing DOGE to do we're headed for another great recession. Maybe that will be the inciting event to have a revolution. But I just don't know. The Constitution setup the branches of the government in such a naive way. There are no true checks and balances, just gentleman's agreements to "behave in the best interests of the country". To wit, the Constitution was designed to be a living document to be amended and changed to fit the current society it governs, but this has not been the case. Impeachment does nothing, we have a convicted felon in the White House and a foreign born national directing policy. These are uncharted waters but I don't think anything short of a general strike will change anything.

[-] enbee 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah I agree on all your points. I like to call it ww3 bc “but US won Cold War, no more Berlin Wall”. Also ww3 sounds scarier and I want people to freak out in a real way.

[-] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Fair enough, like I said the point I made was pedantic. Your points stand regardless of if it's called WW3 or anything else.

[-] enbee 2 points 1 month ago

Btw the first word of ur username should be correct

[-] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I couldn’t justify putting correct in my username on Lemmy. But I loved the reference too much not to use it, so here I am, a less secure truncated version of a better password.

[-] enbee 4 points 1 month ago

did we just become best friends?

[-] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Wanna build bunk beds? You can have top bunk. Mom still has me with rubber sheets.

[-] socsa@piefed.social 5 points 1 month ago

The crazy part of this is how many people on here will agree with this in principle, but then turn around and repeat propaganda about Biden. The same exact thing they did with Clinton. The playbook is so obvious to anyone who has not become emotionally invested in denying that they got taken by this Russian agitprop.

[-] UpperBroccoli 32 points 1 month ago

At this point, I really do believe the guy could step onto timesquare and just kill a bunch of people, and his voters would still do the mental gymnastics to explain all of that away as the act of a genius businessman just out there to save your average white suburbanite slob. If they even believed it in the first place, the probability of which is quite low.

So yeah, no, that seems quite unlikely.

[-] Makhno@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I mean, it's quite literally a Nazi fascist cult. No need to call it anything less

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

Trump definitely acts like a person that Putin has a hold over. If he had, the only question is what this "hold" is.

My bet: A video of Trump happily banging a minor (or even several) in a Moscow hotel room. It would perfectly fit his personal profile, him being a "friend" of Epstein.

[-] limelight79@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago

Nah, it has to be money. No way something like that would ruin Trump at this point.

[-] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah he is open with being a pig, but money is something he can never refuse. It's his only way to be relevant to anyone because he has never felt real respect from another human

[-] Railing5132@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

There's fucking video of eric(?) saying: "we don't rely on American banks; we have all the support we need from Russia"

[-] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I'm not sure even that would be enough. It's not even an open secret that he's a pedophile and rapist. He's been convicted of the ladder, and he was best friends with Epstein.

Nobody cares.

If a video came out of him raping children, he'd just call it "fake news" and move on, and his supporters would mostly follow him. They've made themselves totally subservient to his whims.

[-] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

From my perspective, this doesn't seem very complicated. Putin is rumored to be the richest (now second or third richest) man in the world. Elon gave what would have previously been well within Putin's budget and look at the absolute subjugation Trump is willing to put up with. This was always a quid pro quo, but Trump doesn't operate on Kompromat. In my opinion, it's just buying favor because it literally is that transactional. Trump will only rip you off if he thinks he can get away with it unscathed.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 16 points 1 month ago

“My silence is because what I really think is not in the mainstream,” Scaramucci replied. “And so what I really think, if I end up saying it on our podcast, people will say, OK, I’m being absurd. OK, so—but I think there’s a hold on him.”

Fuck you. You were complicit. For 1 mooch, but still. You saw all this shit and you still agreed to be part of the administration. Even now, you'll hint at it but not say everything. Your comments against Trump now mirror other rich Republican assholes who only speak up after the fact, when they can no longer benefit from his cult-like base.

[-] twistypencil@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Need more than hints and vague language, we all know it's true, but release the peepe tapes now

[-] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This is the difference between the DNC and the GOP. Both parties know that the PeePee tapes exist and are fake, however the GOP would have released them in 2017 regardless of if they were real or not. Much like the trumping up of Hillary's email server and Bengazi. It's not about what's true or real anymore. It's about public sentiment. That's how Russian and Chinese misinformation are so successful here. We've defunded our schools and have people struggling so much to make ends meet they cannot take the time off to vote, and when they do vote they're often not really looking at anything else than how much groceries and gasoline cost. Which pointedly, the Executive branch has little control over.

We've been fucked since Reagan. John Hinckly Jr. frankly should have had more firearms training.

[-] dditty@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

I don't think Scaramucci knows shit about fuck

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 month ago

Today's word is: Kompromat

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Yeah. But if you supported the alternative, you're a genocide supporting false progressive blue or nothing scab. In all caps sometimes. Get criticized for calling out the sitouts in one thread, then in another they claim they voted Kamala anyway.

Seriously, I think these guys are running on a script.

[-] yesman@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Why does anyone still listen to Anthony Scaramucci or Michael Cohen? These guys were never whistle-blowers, just con-men who changed teams.

This whole thing hinges on Scaramucci's credibility, which means it should be ignored.

this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2025
371 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23010 readers
3141 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS