197
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Remember how the redcaps were gaslighting everyone?

Saying how any comparisons of the corrupted conservative SCOTUS overturning 50 years of precedent to Handmaid's Tale was being melodramatic, hysterical, etc...? That this was just about "states rights" (lol, yeah, right, we see how Bronzo the Clown views states rights when a Governor dares to defy him) and everything would be just fine, because redcap capture of a state would of course go very well for the women in that state, of course and so on.

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago

I'm sorry maam you appear to be a little big around the waist, please present papers or stand in that line over there to be tested.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Just like in Nazi Germany, and pregnant women instead of Jews. Are pregnant women required to wear some signs, too?

So. Not my state, but I’m pretty certain that that might run foul of the US Constitution. Even with the current Supreme Court.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

I'm not entirely sure of that.

[-] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 84 points 3 days ago

What in the actual fuck is happening in America? Jesus Christ what a shit show America has become.

[-] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 38 points 3 days ago

Christo fascism under the veil of patriotism. Pretty much what was expected to happen...

[-] Zorsith 23 points 3 days ago

Every-dystopia everywhere all at once. Wheeeee.

[-] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 68 points 3 days ago
[-] LMurch@thelemmy.club 16 points 3 days ago

I picked late summer. They've exceeded my expectations. Sad..

[-] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 48 points 3 days ago

House Bill 807, nicknamed the “Save MO Babies Act,” was proposed by Republican state Rep. Phil Amato.

The bill summary states that, if passed, Missouri would create a registry of every expecting mother in the state “who is at risk for seeking an abortion” starting July 1, 2026. The list would be created through the Maternal and Child Services division of the Department of Social Services, but the measure did not specify how the “at risk” would be identified.

The same dickheads who want a registery of pregnant women would screech about tyranny if there was a registery of gun owners.

Their only animating principle is "I get to tell 'inferior people' what to do."

[-] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 63 points 3 days ago

Wow, not even a month and they are making lists.

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago
[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago

Give pregnant people guns? 🤔

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Could work!

[-] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Woah, now what about the rights of ~~men~~ actual people

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Well that's pretty much expected from that shit ass state I left behind.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 16 points 3 days ago

Before you get panicky, proposed. Anyone can propose anything, and state lawmakers are a whole other kind of crazy.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

That someone even proposes such a shit should ring all alarm bells.

[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 days ago

The fact that someone in power even has this desire is fucking troubling.

It's like saying we shouldn't worry about a pedophile at a playground because they're only proposing to rape the children.

[-] El_guapazo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Now if they only counted as 3/5 of a person, then the real outrage would start.

this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
197 points (100.0% liked)

News

25269 readers
3839 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS