411
submitted 5 months ago by CBYX@feddit.org to c/uspolitics@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/8171943

Bear with the slightly extreme wording of the copy-paste below from Reddit - it's actually very similar energy to the actual Executive Order if you want to read the direct source instead.

This Executive Order does the following:

❧ All federal agencies, including independent regulatory commissions, are now subject to direct White House control.

❧ Regulations cannot be issued without presidential approval.

❧ The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) can now withhold funding from independent agencies if they don’t align with White House priorities.

❧ All federal employees must follow the President’s and Attorney General’s interpretation of the law, eliminating legal independence.

❧ A White House Liaison is to be installed in every independent regulatory agency to enforce direct presidential control.

⚠️ This is the biggest executive power grab in U.S. history. ⚠️

This formally ends the concept of an “independent” regulatory agency, dismantling one of the last barriers to absolute executive power.

📍 This order effectively erases the last major restraints on executive power. 📍 The federal government no longer operates with checks and balances. 📍 Regulations and laws are now dictated solely by the President. 📍 If left unchecked, this is the moment the U.S. ceases to function as a democratic republic.

1️⃣ The President Now Controls All Regulatory Agencies

✅ The SEC, FTC, FCC, and FEC are no longer independent.

The Stock Market is now subject to White House control, enabling insider trading, favoritism, and targeting of political opponents. Antitrust laws can be selectively enforced, allowing administration-friendly monopolies to expand unchecked. Political opponents in the tech sector, media, or finance can be targeted with regulatory action while allies are protected. Elections are now influenced by direct White House oversight of the Federal Election Commission (FEC).

✅ The FDA, EPA, and consumer protection agencies are fully politicized.

Drug approvals, food safety regulations, and environmental policies can be rewritten for political or corporate interests. Climate change regulations can be erased overnight. Scientific research is now subject to White House approval before public release.

🚨 Implication: There is no longer any neutral enforcement of economic, environmental, or election laws. Everything is now dictated by political loyalty.

2️⃣ The White House Can Block Agency Budgets or Direct Funds Elsewhere

✅ The OMB can now adjust funding allocations for independent agencies.

This gives the President the power to defund agencies without needing Congress. Regulatory agencies that challenge presidential policies will be quietly strangled of resources. Agencies loyal to the President will receive full funding—even illegally. 🚨 Implication: Congress no longer controls federal spending on regulatory enforcement. The executive branch can choke out opposition agencies and reward allies.

3️⃣ The President & Attorney General Have Final Say on All Legal Interpretations ✅ All federal employees must follow White House interpretations of the law.

The Attorney General’s opinions override agency lawyers, inspectors general, and independent counsel. Agencies cannot adopt their own interpretations of legal statutes—everything must align with the President’s views. The President can rewrite federal legal interpretations overnight. 🚨 Implication: Legal consistency is gone. Agencies cannot push back against corrupt, illegal, or unconstitutional directives because the President’s interpretation is the only interpretation allowed.

4️⃣ Installing White House Liaisons in All Regulatory Agencies ✅ A “White House Liaison” will be placed in every independent agency.

This ensures constant presidential oversight of daily operations. These liaisons will report agency actions back to the White House and enforce political compliance. Agency directors will no longer have the ability to act without White House approval.

🚨 Implication: There is now a direct enforcement arm inside every regulatory body. Even agencies that resist presidential control will be internally monitored and controlled.

📍 Every regulatory body—from financial markets to environmental protections—is now politicized. 📍 Congress no longer controls federal funding—agencies must obey the White House or risk defunding. 📍 The President’s legal interpretations override all agency autonomy, eliminating independent enforcement of federal laws. 📍 The federal bureaucracy, once designed to be resistant to corruption, is now completely subject to presidential loyalty.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Pirky@lemmy.world 97 points 5 months ago
[-] Pondis@lemmy.world 64 points 5 months ago

I never expected a country like the US to become a Nazi state. I'm amazed the American people aren't more out raged.

[-] CompostMaterial@lemmy.world 37 points 5 months ago

Really? I feel like the writing has been on the wall for quite some time.

[-] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The Nazis took many notes from the Race Science and White Supremacy of America

https://www.democracynow.org/2020/8/12/caste_isabel_wilkerson

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Ford Motor Company was the primary vector for distribution of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

The company was flush with 19th century Groypers.

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

The Americans, in ww2 times LOVED nazis. They supplied stuff to nazi Germany. The only reason they got involved is because of Hawaii.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Eh... We got involved to back our friends in Britian and France. FDR had been Lend-Leasing our Navy on the cheap and blockading German sea traffic years before Pearl Harbor.

Japan bombed Hawaii to discourage the US from continuing support to the KMT in China and Taiwan. Also necessary prior to inseating McArthur from the big US base in the Philippines and prevent any reprisal for the Japanese invasion of Vietnam.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 71 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

LOL, this is going to get tossed out by the courts as quickly as the funding freeze was.

Putting "By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered" in front of something unconstitutional doesn't magically make it constitutional.

[-] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 58 points 5 months ago

It's blatantly illegal and unconstitutional. The courts will order them to stop, and those court orders will be ignored.

[-] ninja@lemmy.world 42 points 5 months ago

It's funny that the supreme court didn't consider that consequence of telling the president that he's immune to the courts.

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

The funny thing is they said he was immune to all courts except the supreme Court.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

those court orders will be ignored.

What happened with the funding freeze, though? And birthright citizenship? And the DOT incursion?

More importantly, why is everyone just ignoring that the judiciary is, in fact, doing a pretty good job of reversing these power grabs?

[-] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

As I understand it, the funding is still mostly frozen, they just deny that what they are doing is violating the court orders.

And they are going to appeal birthright citizenship all the way to the Supreme Court, but how much that decision even matters will depend on just how much due process people get before being shipped off to gitmo.

Not sure what the latest is on the DoT situation. But the overall trend of taking over agencies, shutting down operations, firing people and accessing restricted data has mostly been happening fast enough that the courts can't prevent it, they can only tell them to fix it after the fact.

I'm not trying to shit on the courts. It's vital that they keep pushing back and keep applying the law. The problem is that they can only do so much if the executive branch won't cooperate. They are dealing with an administration that is hostile to the very notion of the rule of law, and which is dismantling every mechanism that exists to keep them honest and accountable. Trying to apply the law to Trump has always been like nailing jelly to the wall. And that was before he was declared above the law by the Supreme Court, before the purging of anyone with a shred of ethics at the DoJ, and before declaring that he and his AG have the sole power to interpret law in the executive branch (which would of course include decisions about what it means to comply with a court order).

[-] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 26 points 5 months ago

LOL, this is going to get tossed out by the courts as quickly as the funding freeze was.

You still believe in something, huh?

[-] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

The alternative is to feign cynicism while surrendering.

"Nothing can be done, the courts can't do anything, we should just stop trying" is actively harmful in this situation.

[-] Juice@midwest.social 6 points 5 months ago

"The courts can do something' is a bigger barrier to effective action than doomerism, especially if it isn't true

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I can't even make an exaggerated joke here about trusting the checks and balances because this is as crazy as it gets

[-] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

That doesn't matter. The only reason the law has the ability to stop anyone from doing anything is that if you refuse for long enough, eventually, someone will show up with a gun to force the issue. If he knows that won't happen, he can act with impunity.

[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 7 points 5 months ago

They can make their decision, but who will enforce it?

[-] Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago
[-] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

Exactly. If you tell me the law isn't respected then it's bullets on the battlefield

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Or just cops at the door.

The only department Trump seems to respect is DHS. Republicans and Dems alike have been cranking up the police state since Nixon.

Even then, he's expecting a lot of big red states to buy in. This isn't a country you can run directly out of DC. You need a large network of regional allies to project power that does anything.

Imposing tariffs at the scale he's advocating means tens of thousands of inspectors and bureaucrats towing the line. It's not something you can do with an EO in between golf games.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] lurch@sh.itjust.works 57 points 5 months ago

Exactly as expected and foretold.

Yeah, as of Feb. 12 2025 no U.S. federal body can be accepted as credible. All information flowing from the CDC, department of education, energy, health and human services, EPA, FDIC, DOJ and on and on and on. All federal bodies should be IGNORED until credibility is returned.

All of the employees should just go home at this point and let it all collapse so the courts and legislature are forced to act.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

All federal bodies should be IGNORED until credibility is returned.

Sounds of planes crashing into one another

[-] WraithGear@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

I mean why imagine? It’s already happening

[-] olafurp@lemmy.world 39 points 5 months ago

More commonly known as a dictatorship.

[-] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 33 points 5 months ago

Welp, time to gear up for war.

[-] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago

Lol "potentially"? Dude, it's happening undefended. There's no "potentially." It's here.

[-] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago

Well, when the IRS says I owe taxes, I'm going to ask to see the notes that Trump used to work that out.

[-] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 19 points 5 months ago
[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

We ran out of noble blue blood. You get greedy-green blood, dollar tree discount "royals". Sorry!

[-] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Hey I saw this in a movie.

The citizens did not have a good time, and (spoilers) >!it didn't end well for the president or his staff either.!<

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/civil_war_2024

[-] Acidbath@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

I think about this movie on a daily basis. I'm fucking scared. I don't know what else to say.

[-] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 12 points 5 months ago

Just like playbook of communists of russia 😂 I wonder how reps are going to tell this for themselves? US has become 47th oblast of russia. Nice, two hundred years of democracy ruined just in two months.

[-] TheBrideWoreCrimson@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 months ago

I think you are correct. Especially the thing about "liaisons," reminds me of the political officers in the Soviet Union. They were the pillars of a reign of terror.

[-] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Since the GOP controls Congress, could they amend the Constitution to give Trump specifically, absolute power? Like they basically say Trump is no longer subject to checks and balances?

[-] Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago

70% control required of congress to amend the constitution

[-] match@pawb.social 11 points 5 months ago

yeah? who's gonna enforce that

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Taking a sharpie to the Constitution is predicated on people acknowledging the changes.

We barely give a shit about the document in its current state. I'm hard pressed to imagine a Unitary Executive's rewrites would matter since it's been Calvinball Rules since Marbury v Madison.

[-] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Wolf-PAC, we might need that constitutional convention sooner rather than later...

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

https://www.gregabbott.com/texasplan/

Governor Greg Abbott Calls for an Article V Convention of States to restore our Constitution

[-] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Fucking Greg Abbott of all people...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
411 points (100.0% liked)

USpolitics

962 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago