452
submitted 5 days ago by bigfoot@lemm.ee to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ohellidk@sh.itjust.works 76 points 5 days ago

Remember when he said to "use signal"? Pepperidge farm remembers.

[-] Emberleaf@lemmy.ml 72 points 5 days ago

At this point, if you're still using anything even remotely connected to Elon Musk, you get what you deserve. I'm not saying that to be an asshole, either. It's just a simple fact.

[-] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 41 points 5 days ago

Got it. I'll stop "using" the US government. /j

[-] Emberleaf@lemmy.ml 23 points 5 days ago

I think we're the ones being used... ;)

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago

A bunch of government agencies are being told to do business exclusively on X, The Everything App.

Musk's also trying to build out a financials tool within his ecosystem and to incentivize more people to do business in his preferred basket of shitcoins.

He's a monopolist, working with other monopolists to corner the Internet as a marketplace. He's not looking to give people a choice to use other tools.

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 37 points 5 days ago

He says he wants free speech, but all he ever wanted was to replace the previous censorship and propaganda regime with his own.

[-] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 9 points 4 days ago

They always do

[-] gomp@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

He never said he wants free speech for everyone :) TBH the shame should be on those who believed that Musk could somehow be the first right-wing extremist in history that wished the people at large had more rights and more freedoms.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago

He never said he wants free speech for everyone

Yes he fucking did. He called himself a “free speech absolutist” which was just a blatant lie just like every other sentence that has farted out of his Nazi lips.

[-] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 33 points 5 days ago

"free speech absolutist"

[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 26 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I'm surprised DOGE themselves aren't using it to skirt FOIA.

Or maybe they are.

Who says they aren't? Elon has zero problems with double standards.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 18 points 5 days ago

oh they for sure are. also FOIA is probably dead forever. so. you know. be ready for that little announcement.

[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 12 points 5 days ago

privacy for me, but not for thee!

[-] USSEthernet@startrek.website 5 points 4 days ago

They fall under the presidential records act so they aren't subject to FOIA until the 2030s.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

They claim they fall under the Presidential Records Act, but they're lying.

[-] vfreire85@lemmy.ml 18 points 4 days ago

why would someone still be using x at this time for starters is something that baffles me.

[-] gomp@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago

Circle jerking, I guess? Same reason I use lemmy :)

[-] Melody@lemmy.one 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

This just means you wrap your signal links in a URL shortener.

A slight hassle; but all the more reason to hate the muskratt.

We should be quietly linking anyone with a need to send a signal link to a nice privacy respecting URL shortening instance somewhere that will basically delete the link in 3-7 days unless told otherwise to keep it around by the user at creation.

Heck; host your own URL shortener while you're at it.

[-] toototabon@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 days ago

questions, not to you specifically, but to anyone who stumbles upon this thread.

  • what would be a decent URL shortener that meets this criteria?
  • any pointers to host one's own shortener? mainly i'm thinking of registrars, but also the mechanics to transform links and store data for a few days
[-] mcx808@feddit.uk 3 points 4 days ago

I use Shlink, you can probably host it on a little digitalocean droplet or something similar.

[-] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 14 points 4 days ago

"Free speech extremist"

[-] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 days ago

There must be a hundred third-party freeware apps that let you encrypt files. Heck, even zip archivers have a password protect option. If you're a whistleblower, you're going to be collecting data over long periods of time, not sending instant messages. You can use OnionShare (droid-ify) to create temporary TOR links if you really need to share a file quickly and untraceably.

[-] deadcatbounce@reddthat.com 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Isn't it strange that when you believe in an oligarch, they never disappoint.

@bigfoot free advertising for signal imo

[-] Dalde@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)
[-] cavemeat@beehaw.org 4 points 4 days ago

I've gotta donate the signal and spread the word, it's been my messaging goat for years

[-] seonar22@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

least thick skinned wannabe "politician" I've ever seen.

[-] bananapinball@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

"blocks links to Signal" What does that even means? It's not twitter; people are not sharing Signal links.

[-] root@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Most likely invite links to various groups / contacts

[-] shir@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 days ago

Well, them go Telegram? He would not want to block his right wing friends, too, would he?

this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2025
452 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

34096 readers
702 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS