401
submitted 3 weeks ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

Fourteen states sued the Trump administration over Elon Musk’s role as head of DOGE, arguing his authority violates the Constitution.

The lawsuit, led by New Mexico, claims Musk wields unchecked power to cut agencies and budgets without Senate confirmation, making him a "principal officer" under the Appointments Clause.

Another lawsuit by USAID employees raises similar concerns.

Judges have already blocked some DOGE actions, but the White House defends Musk’s role as legal.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] LemmyFeed@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 3 weeks ago

filed by New Mexico Attorney General Raul Torrez and officials from Arizona, Michigan, Maryland, Minnesota, California, Nevada, Vermont, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Oregon, Washington and Hawaii.

These 14 states

[-] SynonymousStoat@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Hoping to see my state added to the list, they've been filling suits on a lot of other issues as well, but sometimes seem to be a little delayed.

[-] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago
[-] Tm12@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago

How do we make this happen?

[-] SynonymousStoat@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Calling the office of the Attorney General in your state would be a good place to start. Also contacting the people in your state's houses of Congress as well as the ones at the federal level.

[-] Eagle0110@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

It's quite encouraging how these states are all from different parts of the US, with different overall cultural values and political stances, yet they are all united on the same side in this.

I hope this is a good sign something might actually work out here, I really hope

[-] jewbacca117@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago

For once could one of these "blasting" articles be a slow motion video of Kentucky Ballistic shooting the person in question with a .950?

[-] burgersc12@mander.xyz 6 points 3 weeks ago

So anyway I started blasting.

[-] Makeshift@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 weeks ago

Put him and his First Lady in jail already. For life. With no loopholes to get out.

No amount of monetary damage will so much as phase them.

[-] Oisteink@feddit.nl 3 points 3 weeks ago

Thats a nice dream. But out in reality there is presidential pardon

[-] SoleInvictus 14 points 3 weeks ago

About fucking time! I've seen articles about criticizing and opposing DOGE, but I knew we wouldn't see any real movement until they started getting blasted or slammed.

[-] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 5 points 3 weeks ago

If my grandma were still alive and saw a grown man standing indoors with a hat on she would whoop his ass. And let's not let her know that he's a Nazi.

[-] Zdvarko@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

I had hopes Lemmy would be at least able to look at absolute polar opposite points of view, and as much as they may grate or cause irritation, see the humanity in these differing opinions.

That aside, and please correct me in as civil way as possible, all I see is the auditing of the governments books, an accounting practice that every business should undertake. To date I see that its clearly obvious, as in the billions found thus far, that there is a clearly mismanagement of funds.

Why does this upset so many people?

[-] Fluke@lemm.ee 8 points 3 weeks ago

Because it's not accounting, it's systematic gutting of bodies that prevent them or their friends doing things.

"Auditing" an entity doesn't usually involve shutting down said entity indefinitely pending the audit which never comes, while the "auditor" makes copies of every bit of data you have for later abuse.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

“Auditing” an entity doesn’t usually involve shutting down said entity indefinitely pending the audit which never comes

Thank goodness too since the IRS tends to audit non-wealthy people far more often than wealthy people. Imagine freezing some poor working person's bank accounts because they were randomly chosen for an audit and some sort of red flag came up.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

all I see is the auditing of the governments books,

I didn't realize you needed total access to the U.S. Treasury and other government computer systems in order to audit the books. Can you explain why that would be necessary?

Also, can you explain why IT people in their late teens and early twenties are the right people to audit anything?

[-] Eagle0110@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Counter argument: there is always government funds used inefficiently, there is always accounting practices that can be improved upon, a government system with perfect efficiency or is completely free from economic corruption does not exist. This simple matter of fact is NOT a justification of giving an individual, who's not an elected governmental official and does not represent the interest of the nation and its people, the authority and power above the entire government, against the constitution.

[-] twistypencil@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Am audit does not take two days and is performed by BigBalls.

this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
401 points (100.0% liked)

News

26331 readers
3335 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS