561
submitted 1 month ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

Trump’s move to defund USAID is causing unintended consequences for American farmers and businesses.

The Washington Post reports that USAID purchases billions in U.S. agricultural products, with American farms supplying 41% of its food aid.

The funding freeze has already halted $340 million in food shipments, leaving tons of wheat stranded in Houston.

Experts warn this decision directly harms American jobs and businesses, as much of USAID’s aid is administered through U.S.-based organizations employing American workers.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SarcasticMan@lemmy.world 182 points 1 month ago

They write these stories like this isn't the result he is looking for. The point is to crash, not rebuild; nothing the Trump administration is doing is geared to help, rebuild, or make America great. That's not how they make money. The more I see, the more I hear the more I am convinced the whole point is to destabilize and rebuild to get rid of that pesky constitution.

Maybe I am just angry or doomsaying, but I'll be damned if it doesn't look that way, and to make matters even worse, people just can't wrap their heads around the whole organized minority rules over the unorganized majority thing.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 98 points 1 month ago

They write these stories like this isn’t the result he is looking for. The point is to crash, not rebuild;

I'm noticing a slightly different pattern with these actions. I don't think trump and his cronies were actually seeking to hurt farmers, but something else.

  1. hurt everyone temporary to see who screams.
  2. Those that scream that are opponents, continue to deny them the government benefit
  3. Those that are allies, extract concessions and/or pledges of fealty before returning the same benefit they had before.
  4. For those that don't scream, or don't scream loud enough, simply pocket the benefit for himself and his own goals.

nothing the Trump administration is doing is geared to help, rebuild, or make America great.

Agreed.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 25 points 1 month ago

Demarcating between enemies and allies (coerced or otherwise) is most definitely a primary goal.

[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Basically pull all the cables and see what breaks that you care about.

Then just fix that.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Basically pull all the cables and see what breaks that you care about.

Then just fix that.

Yes. In IT we call this the "scream test". This feels like that with added corruption.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

And on the way down, connected rich people have already shorted select industries' stocks, then will buy in bigtime after the crash to profit on the long way back up.

The rich get richer.

EDIT: the way back up won't be so long, as theh recovery will be aided by big bailouts (or bail-ins) at the taxpayers' expense. So we'll get screwed not one, not two, but THREE ways.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 21 points 1 month ago

Capital leverages instability to transfer wealth to itself from the working class.

Having control over the levers of chaos means that they can not only leverage instability whenever and however they want, they are also singularly able to predict when the chaos will subside. This increases their economic power exponentially.

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 month ago

That's basically what all the instability of the early 20th century was all about. On one end of the spectrum, you had communists and socialist looking at the old order and then reacting by destroying it all. On the other end of the political spectrum, you had the far right movements of the Nazis in Germany who saw the writing on the wall with the socialist wave moving in and instead wanted to create a counter movement to all the socially minded. The wealthy capitalists, millionaires, monarchs and historic aristocracy were more than willing to back the far right conservative movements who were willing to work with them than to let communists in who clearly just wanted to get rid of all the old wealthy class.

The same thing is happening all over again. Different playing field, new dynamics but still the same old ball game. Modern wealth can't work with the current system and they know things have to change so its better to back the far right than to let any kind of social democratic system take over. They'd rather destroy everything because they know that whoever is first to build whatever that remains will be the new kings and rulers of the future. Rather than accommodate and grow in any democratic system, they'd rather watch the world burn and then take over the masses who will crawl out of the ashes.

[-] Chozo@fedia.io 12 points 1 month ago

Destabilization is 100% the point. Create problems, sell solutions. Make the people reliant on the government for everything so they fully own and control you.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 month ago

the deep fucking irony of who's always complaining about welfare queens…

[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago

destabilize and rebuild

destroy and cash-out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 49 points 1 month ago

Donald Trump may have thought that defunding the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) would only hurt foreigners -- but it turns out he could actually be mistaken.

😮

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

"May have thought" - that would be to strong for him. Thinking has never been his strong point. He reacts to what people around him tell him. He picks up ideas at random and turns them into executive orders.

[-] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Right, he probably only "may have thought" what Musk told him to do, which was to hurt USAID for investigating Starlink+Russia

[-] cley_faye@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago

"gambit"

Sure, let's call it that.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 12 points 1 month ago

The famous chess move: king's gambit. Sacrifice your king for victory. Wait a minute . . .

[-] TehWorld@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

President Musk would be just fine sacrificing Trump.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

It's the normalization blues

[-] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago

Farmers are going to get hammered with retaliatory tariffs on exports too. Time for them to find out I guess.

[-] Red89@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

If they didn't learn last go around, do we expect them to this time. I remember during his first term, his tarrifs made China reduce purchasing (I forgot which crop) from the US. Instead, they looked to other countries like Brazil. To combat the lost revenue to farmers, he created a fund to aid them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

But they just wanted to have someone to punch down on the trans, the brown people, and force everyone to go to their church, that's all!

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 34 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Well, it's what they voted for in their blind hatred of everything that made America great.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago

Seriously, only people permanently stuck in adolescence with bullshit Libertarian notions about government believe that you can BREAK government and things will turn out well.

Only a dumbfuck Randroid type (or maybe the random leftist veering on wrapping all the way around the horseshoe) thinks that burning it all down is going to lead to better things...it's easy if you are totally ignorant to think that "government doesn't do anything for ME" as an actual thing you believe.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 34 points 1 month ago

... "government doesn't do anything for ME" as an actual thing you believe.

This happens because people take completely for granted all of the things government quietly does for them.

It's kind of the same as "Why do we even have an IT department? Everything works, what are they even doing?"

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Such an apt analogy - this actually happens all the time in corporations. IT tends to just get treated as a cost center, most especially if everything is running smoothly. Stupid people at companies will often just look at the price of that and think it's time to fuck with it...

It's almost the same thing with vaccines. A whole lot of dumbasses think vaccines "never did them no good", because vaccines are a victim of their own success, and most people alive today have not really seen how bad it can get without them [1].

Idiots can then try to pin the state of health we have, largely thanks to vaccines, on other things like septic systems, "eating healthy", etc...

[1] I've anecdotally noticed that for the most part, you didn't see older generations going for that anti-vax shit. It seems to have started with some (younger) boomers, a lot of Gen-Xers and on down. But again, that's because it's an out-of-sight, out-of-mind kind of thing. Some of the older people (like Greatest Generation) saw how life can be incredibly cruel w/o vaccines...sadly, all that wisdom is dying out and our education system sucks, so this wisdom was not passed on to enough people. Critical thinking is probably as bad as ever, and we are probably on the verge of FAFO...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Tehbaz@lemmy.wtf 3 points 1 month ago
[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 month ago

Everyone knows international aid is to support local economies

I don’t think anything is backfiring

[-] Kompressor@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

Surely they’ll still buy those goods and give them to Americans. They aren’t just dissolving programs and making money disappear, couldn’t be.

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I had some nutjob on a local group tell me that Trump has removed federal taxes as if I and everyone else can't clearly see that we're still paying the same federal taxes on my paystubs. I can't believe how brainwashed some people have become.

Also tangentially related but I filled out my tax return today and owe a lot more this year thanks to his bullshit 2018 tax bill that capped SALT deductions, removed the child tax credit, and only gave temporary cuts to people who aren't in the 1%. I can only imagine that his supporters are either retired, unemployed, or on social security to also not realize how much more he's forcing us to pay to the government.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago

Yeah, they couldn't possibly be cruel or incompetent, not them!

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

According to AOC this whole cutting nonsense is because they need to come up with up to 4 billion dollars to get the votes to pass their new tax reduction plan for the rich.

[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Trump: "If food prices are so high, what if we just... keep all the food here? That will bring them down, right?"

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Dustbowl 2025, fuck yeah! Bringing back the classics!

(Farmers won't or can't spend money to plant -> too many fallow fields -> giant walls of airborne topsoil)

[-] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago
[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

Similarly, weapon shipments to Israel and Ukraine are subsidies of American weapons manufacturers.

I wonder which party farmers and defense contractors tend to vote for?

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

!leopardsatemyface@lemmy.world

[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

The Washington Post reports that USAID purchases billions in U.S. agricultural products, with American farms supplying 41% of its food aid.

I did not know this myself.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Basically all of foreign "giving" by America is done by purchasing American goods and giving them in exchange for goodwill, soft power, regional stability, favorable trade deals, or other political capital.

Many Americans don't understand any of that and think their tax money is going in the form of a check to people who don't care and don't give us anything in exchange. And it's not like this is a secret, it's just kinda gauche for the government to explicitly state it

[-] dariusj18@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

That's the thing about how headlines mislead. When they say, "US sends $x in aide or weapons," what they really mean is that the US is subsidizing an American lobby group. Not to say that is bad thing, just that it gives the wrong impression.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 month ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
561 points (100.0% liked)

News

27476 readers
3821 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS